I'm philosophically against the death penalty, BUT..
 

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/01/25/...illers.letter/

I'd pull the switch/pull the trigger/etc. on this guy and would sleep like a baby the next night.

Here's a link to another forum that has more information about what happened:

http://crimeshots.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5312

Sick b@stard.

I feel the same way about the death penalty but i'd pull the trigger on that piece of human excrement as well.

Why be kind to him?

Yeah, he is a bag of sh*t.

There are many like him some even enjoying power . . .unchallenged accumulating wealth in the billions while pretending they are honorable men by wearing white shirts on state occasions for publicity stunts. The man's fault is that he did all this while not having enjoyed power.

Man's stupidity knows no bounds because it stems from their stupid pride which also knows no bounds. I'll say no more.

I say we give this piece of trash a slow painful death.

Can you think of a better punishment for this white supremacist rapist than keeping him alive for a very long time while getting raped in prison by a succesion of his "racial inferiors"?

imo you stared into the abyss for too long....

Disagree. I think this is one person who's given up his right to live, if you ask me. I have to admit the sadistic part of me agrees with Tribesman on this.

So you think that no human act, regardless of how heinous, justifies eliminating the perpetrator?

Is this the "dissect crimes and waddle in their seediness while at the same time pretending to achieve moral superiority by advocating the death penalty or in Tribesman's case male rape" - thread?

where do you see "eliminating" in "a slow painful death"(by Rilder) and "keeping him alive for a very long time while getting raped" (by Tribesman)? I can agree that putting yours, Xabba's descriptions with those two above into one sack was a little abuse but the tendency you showed is similar. I just see no difference between punishment and revenge in what you are saying. You want a medieval sense of justice in times of mobile phones.

If I had a medieval sense of justice i'd be advocating putting that animal on the rack. All I was saying is that while I am normally against the death penalty i'd make an exception in his case. That's because there is absolutely no doubt about his guilt.

My suggestion was because I oppose the death penalty.
Are you somehow saying that the outcome I suggested would not be fitting for this particular piece of scum?
If so can you explain why such a result would not be appropriate.

Unfortunately thats nearly always the case, until people calm down and look.
The problem with the claim that "there is absolutely no doubt" when it comes to capital punishment is that again and again that phrase turns round and bites them on the arse at a later date.

You got something there but I would venture to guess there would be some sort of protection with the other supremacists. There are groups, gangs, whatever you want to call them.

As he appears to be a violent criminal he should be considered a threat even to the general prison population, so I would suggest solitary....but as a cost cutting measure make it solitary where he has to share a cell.
Though of course you can't make him share his solitary cell with a white supremacist as that would be rewarding him by placing him in his little whites only paradise.

I just made a statement of fact.

I'll bet O.J. Simpson has already got into a gang. If he didn't, I think we already would have heard about his prison murder.