![]() |
RAF to revert to Prop engine aircraft for ground attack role!
|
Maybe they will bring back Tempests and Typhoons:)
|
Quote:
Oh gawd yes! Let this be so! |
Nah they are getting a Brazillian!
Next comes the back sack and crack.:O: |
I am wondering since long why this has not been considered earlier. Propeller ground attack aircraft are used with great success in South America since long. And the advantages are not only financial, but flight-related as well.
And now I'm off to FS9 to do some low altitude stunts with my SF.260 tactical trainer! :cool: |
Its probably the best idea the MOD has come up with in a long time.
|
Everything old is new again. Might be time to dust off some of those Vietnam vintage Skyraiders. :cool:
http://www.salute.org/images/SkyRaider.JPG |
Quote:
|
I know Embraier's ears just perked up. ;)
|
Ah now while I agree that for COIN work props are a much better asset to have than fast jets. Just look at the OV-10 Bronco, IMHO one of the most suited planes to COIN if you want to build a new one, but this has come at the request of the army.
Now he would like to see the RAF reduced to an airline and the navy reduced to coastal protection. He seems to forget how without the navy his army would effectively be able to get anywhere and also that there are more than a few occasions you want a fast jet. Typhoon has pretty much been paid for. To cut back now would be stupid. They say we always equip ourselves to fight the last war not the current or future war, however I feel in the future we will see a return to state vs state wars as resources dwindle so we could end up with a scenario where we need tosend out a good strike force and have nothing but a few rowing boats and prop planes and an army stuck in blighty. Also £67 million for a Typhoon but £60 million for an F-35? I think that is just a bit wrong. The JSF is way over price now. Personally if they need to save money scrap the JSF, buy Rafale or Super Hornet and have two seat Typhoons for your Tornado replacement. As a SDR is coming up each force is trying to set out its stall. I personally fear that the Army will win over at the expense however of the Navy. The RAF this time round can take it. It is easier to reactivate mothballed Typhoons stored in a hangar than it is to restart a ship that has been tied up at dock for 6 months. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Makes sense.... £5 million vs £60 million. As you yanks say "Do the math"
|
Hmmmm
Typical Pongo thinking. Remember big SDR coming up in the UK soon. The 3 Services are just squaring up against each other for the biggest slice of the pie (or the smallest cuts) An aircraft like this might be useful in the counter insurgency role. But absolutely no ****ing use against an adversary with any kind of Airforce! No one knows what tomorrows war will be. Balanced Forces with capabilities across the board are what is needed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
...for now. Of course you will always need front line, cutting edge units.. but using the US as an example.. do National Guard pilots really need to be flying state-of-the-art jet fighters? In alot of countries reservists are not even armed (alot of National Guard members should not be lol). I was in the Navy, and any military man can understand wanting the latest and greatest toys, but it is not necessary in every level of the service. |
Quote:
If you had a squadran or two of light attack aircraft that can double as trainers and gerneral purpose aircraft, it may be cost effective. How many wars or peace keeping missions would they suit?:hmmm: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.