Danny Glover... what a tool !
 

Unbelievable


http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegr...act_with_gaia/

Another idiot.
The world is full of them.

Well I certainly agree that his opinion is uninformed (at least from a scientific perspective), that site could be a little less vitriolic in its commentary, i would hardly call his opinion "obscene".

Yea its the DT almost expected of them. Honestly I just watched the video.

I think the earthquake was caused by the sudden movement of tectonic plates but it may have been made stronger and the damage greater by other factors.

:har::haha::rotfl2:

Here's a bunch of smileys, all for you.

:arrgh!:
:doh::o:|\\
:shucks::yeah::03:
:O::timeout::haha::know:
:):DL:D:cry::wah::woot:

Pardon my ignorance, but is it even possible for the climate to affect the movement of tectonic plates?

Didn't even know what they were until I Googled the term :o

Well I don't think directly but things like soil erosion, human cultivation and processing of the land may have an effect on the destructiveness of an earthquake. Also things like poverty naturally have an effect on the amount of victims. So like I said, there are factors, not sure what Glover means exactly though.

The petty influince wind, rain, mans footsteps have on earth is nothing as opposed to the inconcevable forces taking place beneath our feet literally moving mountains.

As far as I know the outer crust floats on hot molten lava and this tend to shift and move. Sometimes one plate will slip down from the opposing plate and it generates great heat. So, your once fluvial plain experiences movement it is termed an earthquake. How does a summit a for the climate get involved.

Maybe this person should just stay with Riggs and be a lethal weapon.

Hello,
maybe we can kill ourselves by nuclear bombs, chemical warfare or just exterminate other species which then leads to our own extinction due to the food chain, but i tell you - even with the biggest bombs we will not be able to influence plate tectonics, let alone making any influence by agricultural activities or praying to the wrong god lol.

The earth itself without this thin surface we call atmosphere (if we really srew it up and kill ourselves as a result) is perfectly able to develop its own activities without help of us ridiculous ants crawling over its surface.

We are living on a thin crust that has been moving since 3.5 billion years, swimming on a semi-liquid and very hot mantle of molten "rock" - and this crust is made of many single plates, that constantly push others around, sink others/are being sunk or pile up against each other. The movement is usually some 2 centimeters a year e.g. in the atlantic ocean floor, but at the collision areas the tension rises until the friction of the crusts cannot hold back the tensions any more - and it makes a hefty and sudden jerk - an "earthquake".

You do not really need a god for this, unless you call him Pluton like our ancestors. But believe a geologist (me), no prayer or political/ religiously/ whatever human behaviour will prevent this crust from moving.

Greetings,
Catfish

P.s: Maybe it would have been wise to build earthquake-resisting buildings, powerplants and whatnot, like they do in Japan, but you need MONEY for this, and Haiti is a poor state, thanks to its government.
To tell such phrases like the climate and our behaviour being the reason for what recently happened in Haiti or- in this Pat Robertson's bull$hit - guilt or religiously "wrong" behaviour in connection to and after this event is asking for someone using a shotgun against those self-righteous a$$holes.
Sorry, venting done.

Save being sorry for sometime when you actualy do something wrong.
No appologies neccesary on this occasion. Good post!

:03:

You're all wrong. It was caused by the pending superbowl win of the SAINTS who made a pact with the devil.

Forgot one:

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q...hawk/crazy.gif

Thank you for this obviously knowlegable answer. It makes a nice change to the 'smiley-posters' who frequent this board.

To clarify, I didn't mean that things such as soil erosion and poverty actually cause the earthquake but that they create and magnify the damage to the human population of a stricken area.

Although with even my limited knowledge of earthquakes, I think there is still quite a bit of uncertainty when it comes to the prediction of earthquakes. The danger areas are roughly known but people are still allowed to live in these areas. And even when an earthquake is somewhat predicted with seismic measurements, then what? Some bespectacled absent-minded professor type will run over to the white house and somehow convince the world leaders that something needs to be done to save people in some third world country that doesn't even have any oil? Hasn't happened as of yet to my knowledge.

Isn't Danny Glover a little too old for this schitt? :haha:

Short answer: No.