SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   My theory about us Sim captains (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=153385)

Kloef 07-03-09 05:58 AM

My theory about us Sim captains
 
He sailors:)

bear with me i've been thinking about this alot...

Some of us have years of experience sailing submarines trough the virtual world,we learn all the tricks know all the moves,know all the sounds.Apart from leadership and personal experience you could say some of us are pretty good at it.

Maybe a strange comparison,the simulated over the real thing but technically you make the same technical/tactical decisions..and the results are the same.......sunken tonnage!

So to conclude my question is:

Purely on the decision making part and the tactical moves are we any good in comparison with real Wo2 sub captains?



So i was wondering what you guys think about that.

Rockin Robbins 07-03-09 06:36 AM

No, your life isn't in danger, so there are no similarities between your decisions and a real U-Boat captain's decisions. You also don't have individual crew members with various strengths and weaknesses, so your command decisions have no relationship with the command decisions of a real U-Boat captain.

That's only the beginning but I'll leave the rest for others to abuse you with.:har:

SteamWake 07-03-09 06:47 AM

I think it would be safe to say that a game is a far sight easier than real life :haha:

Torplexed 07-03-09 06:48 AM

My answer would be an unequivocal no. We're good at playing a game that maybe simulates maybe a tiny percentage of what went into being a real WW2 sub captain. We have way more control over the situation than a real captain would. Everything on our sub always works perfectly and crew always does their job. We don't have to worry about distractions like navigational errors, spoiled food, sea-sickness, stench, contaminated water, stifling humidity, numbing cold, leadership, morale, short circuits, responsibility for our crew's well-being, and about a million other details. We can take a break, quit the game anytime we wish and go for a walk or watch TV. We never have to deal with the myriad human and mechanical problems of a real submarine from a troublesome crew member to a broken down bilge pump for which the spare parts have gone missing all of which eventually have a bearing on your tactical decisions. We never have to deal with seeing a burned and blacken corpse float by for which we are responsible. Not to mention that the AI is only a shadow of what the real enemy would be like. I'd be embarrassed to even attempt to compare myself to a real submarine captain....and I'm glad it's just a game.

Rockin Robbins 07-03-09 08:21 AM

Arrrrrrrr! Whip him without mercy~!:03:

Also, in real life you wouldn't have sarcastic hecklers like us questioning your every utterance........maybe you would!:haha:

Dread Knot 07-03-09 08:34 AM

I guess I look at it this way. I'm pretty good at playing Paintball. I wonder if that means I would make a decent platoon leader.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. No.

Armistead 07-03-09 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kloef (Post 1128119)
He sailors:)

bear with me i've been thinking about this alot...

Some of us have years of experience sailing submarines trough the virtual world,we learn all the tricks know all the moves,know all the sounds.Apart from leadership and personal experience you could say some of us are pretty good at it.

Now i'm gonna be bold,with all this experience we have are we actually better then they were at their time?Alot of us have more hours at the controls then any u-boot captain would ever attain in a career!

Maybe a strange comparison,the simulated over the real thing but technically you make the same technical/tactical desisions..and the results are the same.......sunken tonnage!

So to conclude my question is:

Purely on the desision making part and the tactical moves are we any good in comparison with real Wo2 sub captains?



So i was wondering what you guys think about that.

You're not being serious are you? Please say you're not. If this theory were somehow true, just think
of the possibilities....endless.

The only thing funnier than this thread would be someone trying to explain to you the differences in complete detail.

Armistead 07-03-09 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kloef (Post 1128119)
He sailors:)

bear with me i've been thinking about this alot...

Some of us have years of experience sailing submarines trough the virtual world,we learn all the tricks know all the moves,know all the sounds.Apart from leadership and personal experience you could say some of us are pretty good at it.

Now i'm gonna be bold,with all this experience we have are we actually better then they were at their time?Alot of us have more hours at the controls then any u-boot captain would ever attain in a career!

Maybe a strange comparison,the simulated over the real thing but technically you make the same technical/tactical desisions..and the results are the same.......sunken tonnage!

So to conclude my question is:

Purely on the desision making part and the tactical moves are we any good in comparison with real Wo2 sub captains?



So i was wondering what you guys think about that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dread Knot (Post 1128175)
I guess I look at it this way. I'm pretty good at playing Paintball. I wonder if that means I would make a decent platoon leader.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. No.

With all the time I've spent play Tiger Woods Golf, I guess this means I can beat Tiger Woods.:haha:

Buddahaid 07-03-09 10:19 AM

I think both posits given here have validity. While it true we don't have the level of complexity in actuality, we also don't play in real-time. Many of the tasks, such as navigation, are very complex with all the variables we simply take for granted as done to save time.

Buddahaid

Kloef 07-03-09 11:44 AM

Quote:

Also, in real life you wouldn't have sarcastic hecklers like us questioning your every utterance........maybe you would!
I dont mind its just fun to read the reactions!


Quote:

I'd be embarrassed to even attempt to compare myself to a real submarine captain....and I'm glad it's just a game.
I dont compare myself to the real thing,its just something i think about and want to share thoughts on,you will never see me wear a T-shirt with " i'm a subsim-captain " and yes its a game i can shut off,pause or replay...

Quote:

You're not being serious are you?
not really its just an idea..


Quote:

The only thing funnier than this thread would be someone trying to explain to you the differences in complete detail.
i think someone just did:haha:

Funny the paintball theory....but its not nearly the same and Tiger Woods had eye surgery so he doesnt count:har:

Armistead 07-03-09 12:11 PM

I didn't think you were serious, but threads just fun for the reactions often don't go well.:03:

Mr.O'Bannon 07-03-09 12:51 PM

I bet there are more then a couple potentially great WWII subdrivers on this forum.

Task Force 07-03-09 01:50 PM

yea, some of us would be pretty good, (not the 700,000 tons that some of us have gotten in acouple of years.) but good.:yep:

sunvalleyslim 07-03-09 04:25 PM

In true life I got to be a Torpedoman on a Fleet Boat (USS Segundo SS-398, 1968-70) Me and the Capt. knew how far we were going to go in that Mans Navy. Wish I could have been at the Control Table plotting the course. But at the time I thought it was cool to be in the Torpedo Room, loading and firing...................:salute::salute::salute:

Morpheus 07-03-09 06:56 PM

No :D

Besides all reality factors, this simulation is just not complex enough...

Mikeb213 07-03-09 07:40 PM

We may not be able to compare to real 'sub captains' but I would be willing to bet on the fact that we are well versed on the theories that are behind being a real sub driver. Want something interesting to chew on? What if they had computers and a game like this back then. I bet they could have used SH4 as a way to do some basic training. Regardless of the real life threats, the tactics, and the theories remain the same.

pythos 07-03-09 08:03 PM

Honestly I think you all misread what he was asking. He clearly asked if TACTICALLY we could be real sub skippers. Nothing about dealing with the living conditions, or crew anomalies (and what was that about crew always getting stuff done? I don't know about you but my crew drags along when there are MINOR leaks in the hull, resulting in lost sub.)

I am a pilot, and I am an avid flight sim pilot as well. Let me tell you, the "tactics" you learn with flight sim, can and do translate seamlessly into the real world. Now they are getting actual system simulation into some of the planes. Now a home simulator cannot simulate the psycological effects of being in the clouds with your life in the little hands of those instruments. The first time I actually did it I asked myself "what the hell am I doing?" Even now when I go into the clouds I get a very small tinge of fear. At the same time, I love it. Flying in and out of clouds is like no other experience.

I'll bet that most here could indeed set up a torpedo shot, just like an average skipper. We know how to overhaul a target, get into position by giving the necessary orders, and unleash simulated fish or eels at unsuspecting targets.

Now when it comes to evasion of escorts, that is a totally different story. First off we lack many of the tools real comanders had, such as making your boat appear dead, by bottoming out in shallow waters. We also lack the fact sonar gets "confused" by the closeness of the boat to the bottom. We do not have crack or even good sonar men that tell us when charges are on their way, or when a destroyer is on attack run, or when there is a circle runner trying to return home. The asdic in the game does not sweep like actual asdic. We cannot use the detonation of the charges to mask our own frantic flank bursts to evade the next run.

We also do not have to deal with a mechanical beast that is never perfect, always leaking at some joint, and is getting fatiqued from the dives of its life. Unless damaged our engines always turn flawlessly, not so with the real thing. Radar failure was also quite common, as were TDC failures.

Yes the life of a submariner is a far cry from us sitting in our comfy chairs in our warm house...on our own usually. But tactically I am sure there are some here that could do what the real skippers did.

Navigation for long trips, and astrogation is another matter entirely.

Torplexed 07-03-09 08:10 PM

If any of us could be transported back to WW2 we'd probably more valuable as a font of naval intelligence than as a submarine captain. If we have one edge on a WW2 captain it's that the average SH4 player probably knows more about the relative strengths and weakness of the IJN than anyone in uniform back then. For instance, since they were built in secrecy the US didn't even know of the existence of the Yamato class battleships until the Marines captured some photographs in the Solomons fighting. Even then it was a year before the full details were known.

Plus, we could clue them in about the defective Mk 14....and tell them them to build more submarines. :03:

kylesplanet 07-03-09 11:20 PM

I know I could hit the target, I'd just switch to auto target and turn the duds off. :har:

Morpheus 07-04-09 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kylesplanet (Post 1128559)
I know I could hit the target, I'd just switch to auto target and turn the duds off. :har:

lol, that was a good one :rotfl:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.