![]() |
I was just thinking.....
how about a playable RODNEY?!?!?!
im sorry about the picture size, but it shouldn't be hard to port it over from SH3 and make it playable...i would, but I can't work s3d like some wizards out there (tom!) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...le_drawing.png |
I did not tell you? its part of the mod!
|
so does that measn you have one done?
I can beta test!:up: |
YOUR PART OF THE TEAM YOU CAN ALWAYS TEST!:up: BUT I THOUGHT I SENT YOU THE SH3 AI VERSION TO BE CONVERTED AND SKINED?
|
Once it gets ported ill start on the dmage model!
|
sounds good
|
no, you sent me all the merchies, ivank, i don't think you sent me warships...
|
I will ASAP
|
on second thought I dont have it, do you have one Tom?
|
Yes i think i do , but only from my sh3 install
|
yea, could you send that to Hammer, he will convert it
|
BTW how are those ships going Hammer? I could use atm
|
Yes nice ship. All guns forward, an agressive philosophy.
i sunk one of them with my IX-B boat in the med :arrgh!: |
Quote:
Still, the Nelson class were very nice ships (if somewhat weird thanks to the Washington Naval Treaty), would love to see it playable |
When TSWSM v1 is released the Nelson, KGV, Repulse, etc... RN battleships will be there.
|
@ hartmann.
agressive yes. it basically had the same armrament as an Iowa class BB...but, i thought the Nelson/Rodney had a bit more panache about them...(every car i see in england has a long tood too,cryptc message from the battleship designer?((the name fails me atm))) |
The Rodney had a significantly lighter broadside than the Iowa due to her use of high-muzzle velocity and lighter shells (A design which IIRC was found unsatisfactory)
So while she had identical caliber guns, she was not quite a match for the USN 16"-armed BBs |
thats why i said basic:lol:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.