SUBSIM Radio Room Forums
Page 1 of 4 1 234
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Naked guy gets tasered and falls down to his death (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=142486)

HunterICX 09-25-08 11:52 AM
Naked guy gets tasered and falls down to his death
 
A Sad ending for this confused guy,:nope:

Quote:
Police fired a Taser at a naked Brooklyn man armed with only a fluorescent light tube yesterday, sending him falling to his death from a second-floor ledge after he went on a 40-minute rant.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/09252008...lay_130670.htm

(there's a video on the page)

HunterICX

antikristuseke 09-25-08 12:00 PM
What was the purpuse of tazering him?

SteamWake 09-25-08 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
To see if the fluorescent lamp he was holding would light up?

Skybird 09-25-08 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
I have reached the opinion that tazers more and more are getting used preemptively and for disciplinary measures. Both is unacceptable. Tazers exclusively should be used in cases of police being attacked by suspects turning clearly violent against them. not following orders fast enough, or sanctionising unwanted behavior, are not sufficient reasons to tazer somebody. the police is not the judge. Doing so is not different to beating up a suspect because of his "suspicious dark skin colour". tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.

Dowly 09-25-08 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
I have reached the opinion that tazers more and more are getting used preemptively and for disciplinary measures. Both is unacceptable. Tazers exclusively should be used in cases of police being attacked by suspects turning clearly violent against them. not following orders fast enough, or sanctionising unwanted behavior, are not sufficient reasons to tazer somebody. the police is not the judge. Doing so is not different to beating up a suspect because of his "suspicious dark skin colour". tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.
Couldnt agree more! :up:

Konovalov 09-25-08 12:49 PM
I don't understand how much of a threat one man can pose on a 2nd floor ledge for him to be tazered. :-? On the face of it this strikes me as just plain crazy.

Mikhayl 09-25-08 12:55 PM
Yeah, some cops seem to think that since it's a (supposedly) non-lethal weapon, then they can use it at will. Morons :nope:

Letum 09-25-08 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
[...]Tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.

^ This with passion!

goldorak 09-25-08 01:11 PM
A non lethal weapon is an oxymoron.
Damn politically correctness, it will doom us all. :nope:
Weapons are always made to kill, they are desgned for that sole purpose.
Show me a non lethal weapon and I will sell you the golden gate bridge. ;)

Letum 09-25-08 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldorak
Show me a non lethal weapon and I will sell you the golden gate bridge. ;)
I have a assault spoon made out of jelly (Lime flavor).

Skybird 09-25-08 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldorak
A non lethal weapon is an oxymoron.
Damn politically correctness, it will doom us all. :nope:
Weapons are always made to kill, they are desgned for that sole purpose.
Show me a non lethal weapon and I will sell you the golden gate bridge. ;)
The microwave cannon they use for riot control and install on cruise ships as well.
Weapons in testing that fire glue.
Mines not designed to kill but to wound (and bind more of the enemy's personnel to take care of the wounded).
Pepper spray.
Teargas.
Propaganda.

There are so many. Lucky you are that I do not need any bridge. ;)

Dowly 09-25-08 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Weapons in testing that fire glue.
Lol! I swear I saw a weapon like this in a Judge Dredd comic! :rotfl:(It did work, tho... :hmm:)

SS107.9MHz 09-25-08 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
To see if the fluorescent lamp he was holding would light up?
ehEHEHEH IT'S NOT DARK HUMOUR... IT'S http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/images/icons/icon3.gif HUMOUR :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:!!!

Dowly 09-25-08 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS107.9Mhz
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
To see if the fluorescent lamp he was holding would light up?
ehEHEHEH IT'S NOT DARK HUMOUR... IT'S http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/images/icons/icon3.gif HUMOUR :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:!!!
LOL :p

antikristuseke 09-25-08 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Weapons in testing that fire glue.
Lol! I swear I saw a weapon like this in a Judge Dredd comic! :rotfl:(It did work, tho... :hmm:)
A glue firing gun has been in development for years.

Happy Times 09-25-08 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
I have reached the opinion that tazers more and more are getting used preemptively and for disciplinary measures. Both is unacceptable. Tazers exclusively should be used in cases of police being attacked by suspects turning clearly violent against them. not following orders fast enough, or sanctionising unwanted behavior, are not sufficient reasons to tazer somebody. the police is not the judge. Doing so is not different to beating up a suspect because of his "suspicious dark skin colour". tazers are meant to be non-lethal weapons of self-defense - not more and not less. what we currently hear with regularity, is a clear abuse of the intention behind their introduction.
Couldnt agree more! :up:
x3 Its not ment for that, it is suppose to be replacement for a gun.

sharkbit 09-25-08 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
What was the purpuse of tazering him?
To see if the fluorescent lamp he was holding would light up?
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Soda pop came out my nose while reading this!!!

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Dowly 09-25-08 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Weapons in testing that fire glue.
Lol! I swear I saw a weapon like this in a Judge Dredd comic! :rotfl:(It did work, tho... :hmm:)
A glue firing gun has been in development for years.
It's 6-8 years from when I read the comic. :p COPY-CATS! :D

antikristuseke 09-25-08 03:00 PM
Im not sure which is more surprising, the fact that they are copying a comic book or the fact that you can read :88)

Fincuan 09-25-08 03:04 PM
As you can see he's able to read and write(or has someone do that for him), but even though I've flown several hours with him in IL2, Teamspeak running and all, I still haven't heard him TALK :rotfl:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.
Page 1 of 4 1 234
Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.