SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   When would it be over? A sneak attack that is ... (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=140817)

geetrue 08-15-08 11:26 AM

When would it be over? A sneak attack that is ...
 
What if Russia did the dirty deed?

You know finally launched an all out sneak attack on North America (meaning the good ole USA).

Firing first they wouldn't fool around, all known nuclear weapon stoarage sites would be targeted, Missouri for the B-2's on the ground, Montana for the B-1's.

Alaska, because how close they are to Russia. Washington state and Georgia for the homeports of many submarines that could fire from port if they had too.

Too many targets to discuss ... the real question to any war started in this manner (sneak attack) would be simply this:

When would it be over?

AVGWarhawk 08-15-08 11:32 AM

I think all would have about 30 minutes to say goodbye to their loved ones and goodbye to this big mud ball well call Earth.

Digital_Trucker 08-15-08 11:32 AM

Not until the last button had been pushed, and frankly I don't want to be around for it to be over. Just put me at ground zero for the first one.

Oberon 08-15-08 12:13 PM

http://www.wiredprairie.us/journal/i...Style2_new.jpg

Dowly 08-15-08 12:22 PM

Well, at first I'd watch telly for a few days for news of it. Then, when all seems to be lost for US, I'd call Happy Times;"Hey mate, you bring the weapons, I bring the beer?" and the war would be over in few hours. :p

August 08-15-08 01:54 PM

The war (and everything else I guess) would be over about 1 nanosecond after our retaliatory strike landed.

After all they can target all the land bases they want, but that won't do squat to stop our missile subs from launching.

There's a reason why the cold war never went hot. Mutually Assured Destruction. It's more than just words...

Platapus 08-15-08 02:12 PM

Well given where I work, I probably would not know we were attacked. Just suddenly....nothing.

At least I won't suffer much. :nope:

RickC Sniper 08-15-08 03:15 PM

Didn't we debate this question for about 40 years or more?

UnderseaLcpl 08-15-08 03:18 PM

If we're going down we're taking you all with us!!!!!

Skybird 08-15-08 03:27 PM

It would be over the moment it began. If both players are nuclear powers, the only winning move is not to play.

UnderseaLcpl 08-15-08 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird
It would be over the moment it began. If both players are nuclear powers, the only winning move is not to play.

Just like tic-tac-toe!:D

Foxtrot 08-15-08 03:49 PM

Russia and USA can nuke each other as much as they want.
Just leave Monaco alone!!!

Jimbuna 08-15-08 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
The war (and everything else I guess) would be over about 1 nanosecond after our retaliatory strike landed.

After all they can target all the land bases they want, but that won't do squat to stop our missile subs from launching.

There's a reason why the cold war never went hot. Mutually Assured Destruction. It's more than just words...

Agreed.....pretty nigh on impossible to track the underwater counterstrike.

sergbuto 08-15-08 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikhayl
One thing is for sure, Africa would enjoy the best fireworks in history :know:

...and will have an opportunity to see snow for the first time, I guess.

Jimbuna 08-15-08 04:55 PM

Plenty of sandy beaches to holiday on.....in a thousand years or so :lol:

Sailor Steve 08-15-08 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
There's a reason why the cold war never went hot. Mutually Assured Destruction. It's more than just words...

Best point so far.

Pat Bagley, a political cartoonist here in Salt Lake, once published a book of cartoons titled We Survive World War Three and You Give Us Light Beer? One of his cartoons showed two guys opening the hatch from a bunker and peeking out at the devastation everywhere. The caption is "I think we won."

Frame57 08-15-08 07:15 PM

Yep! You would have a landscape like Chuck Heston found in the movie Planet of the Apes. My luck would be that the apes would be liberal democrats.:D

joegrundman 08-15-08 07:28 PM

Well that will never do. The Republicans must be aware of the chimp gap! Start conservative indoctrination of chimpanzees today!

Schöneboom 08-15-08 08:50 PM

A select few will survive in the underground cities...

General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6...ngeloveek7.gif

August 08-15-08 10:28 PM

Peter Sellers! :up:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.