U-534's fate decided
 

:cry:

Has this been posted? I could not find it.
They have started cutting the poor girl up. such a shame.

Link#2

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/image...boat_gall4.jpg

Why can't they leave her whole and just cut some doors? :cry:


We will never be able to see the ship whole in all her glory again.

:damn: :damn: :damn:

You just don't cut things up when there are only 4 left in the world.

I have a standing clock in the room I am in. I intend to preserve it.

Preservation does not mean I am going to cut my clock into bits. :cry:

Fools! :x

Son of a bitch:nope:

At least it won't be scrapped.

But still :(

Mixed feelings here

In what way is it not being scrapped?

Apart from the melting bit, this fits the scrapped definition quite well.

Um, in that it will still be viewable by the public, those who want to have a look at a WWII U-boat in England can still do so. The difference is daylight.

Scrapping would involve breaking it up into pieces (I know, I know), then making it into razor blades or hairs straighteners.

Thats what they are doing to parts of it!
You may well be shaving with the lower midships of U-534 in the next few months.

:hmm: The article mentions she "will be split into four pieces using a diamond wire cutter". That does not sound like they are tossing anything away or truly scrapping anything. I admit it's a shame to cut her up at all, but it is not like they are tossing large chunks of her into the smelting furnace.

I agree, while I would rather she be preserved in one piece, its better then being scrapped. Look at it this way, at least no matter what happens, she will be around in some respect.

Besides, there is always the 505



That just pisses me off....

Take a look at the image of the plans. There are big chunks of u-boat missing.

This is an absolute disgrace. :nope:

:hmm: Hmm, a difficult one. On one hand I would LOVE to have seen her in all her glory in one piece. But on the other hand I am going to LOVE going round the inside of a U-boat and trying to imagine what it would have been like.

I think to say its a disgrace is too far. A disgrace would have been to just get rid of her in whatever means necessary.

What big chunks? I don't accept some artists interpretation of the final memorial layout as a detailed diagram of the hull sections. The Liverpool Echo reported that she's being cut in two in such a manner that "Cuttings were designed with such precision the sub could be reassembled in one piece".

I see nothing in any of the news reports that indicates any part of her is being demolished or tossed in this process.

I'm not defending the cutting up of a rare historic relic, but at the same time, I don't see any indication that your contention that parts are being wholly lost is true either.

Shame, but I am somewhat happy that she'll still be on display. Had I of gotten charge of slicing her to bits, I would have sliced her clean down the middle (bow to stern) and then fixed up the interior. Then, I'd put her in a warehouse behind a rail so visitors could still look inside. The final product would look something like this:

http://www.wreckhunter.net/images/uboat-interior.gif

(I'm emphasizing on how one can look inside via the missing starboard hull piece.)

:nope: Stuipid people, cutting stuff up is wrong.:nope:

That depends on the "stuff"... you're not going to get me to quit cutting my sausages in the morning!:stare: :rotfl:

She was in very poor shape and should had been indoors not out. So they finally cut her up, what a crime. :nope:

The best way you could possibly learn about the submarine war is to be in the boat just as the guys back then were. Only then could you understand the claustrophobia and the hazards.

This is a pathetic waste of history.

You have just managed to contradict yourself. At first you speak as if you like the idea...

So, take the rusted U-boat, clean her up, cut her up into pieces that the public can go through and see what it was like.

But then you said this...

:hmm: