SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Can Venezuela Defeat England? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=121867)

TteFAboB 09-08-07 01:27 PM

Can Venezuela Defeat England?
 
In naval warfare?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2368707.ece

Hakahura 09-08-07 02:21 PM

As the artical suggests "Sabre Rattling".

Don't think they would make the mistake of trying.

ASWnut101 09-08-07 02:22 PM

Nope.

lesrae 09-08-07 03:36 PM

They could possibly beat England, but not the United Kingdom ;)

Kapitan 09-08-07 03:53 PM

All we would do is send down a fleet with two carriers and re activate HMS invincible, not only that i would have thought they may carry more harriers in cargo ships and also utilise HMS Ocean as a carrier vessel too.

But in terms of fighting us i doubt it very much they have no aircraft carriers, no real big fleet like ours and so they wouldnt really do much to us.

fatty 09-08-07 04:29 PM

Interesting comparison to make because the Royal Navy hasn't changed too much in composition since 1982 but has almost halved in size. If the battles are taking place in the Falklands and Venezuela can use Argentine ports and airfields, they'd definitely have a fighting chance, especially in a few years when they get the rest of their Su-30s and their SSKs.

I vote a draw.

Jimbuna 09-09-07 09:25 AM

I can't imagine any future conflict in the area without assistance from the Americans :nope:
They won't want to see a miniature superpower evolving and locking horns with their best ally in their own backyard :arrgh!:

nikimcbee 09-09-07 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lesrae
They could possibly beat England, but not the United Kingdom ;)

Scottish factor?:yep:

lesrae 09-09-07 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee
Scottish factor?:yep:

And Welsh, and Irish. :D

Godalmighty83 09-09-07 01:11 PM

well we need something to test the astutes out on, have they got any big ships we can sink this time?

Hakahura 09-09-07 02:07 PM

Well going by the UK's last foray into those waters against a Latin Navy, 1 Astute should be more than enough.

Last time 3 simple unguided Mk8 torpedos found their target, the General Belgrano was sunk and the rest of the Argentinian Navy fled for port. Possibly the most cost effective Naval engament ever? An entire fleet taken out for the cost of 3 vintage torpedos. What a shame the Junta of the time did not see the writing on the wall at this juncture.

Be a few years yet before the Asutes reach fleet service, but I'm sure the existing Trafalgars are more than up to the task.

As a I said in a previous post this is most probably a case of "sabre rattling".
Can't really see an advantage in such a move for Venezuela.
Not to mention the fact that the residents of the Falkland Islands have repeatedly expressed their wish to remain UK subjects. They have been there for generations and as far as I'm aware there is no supressed silent minority yearning for "liberation".

Linton 09-09-07 02:15 PM

Only England?Does this mean that the rest of Great Britain will not be attacked?

Spruence M 09-09-07 02:42 PM

Only way the english will loose a war these days is the same reason america will loose one.

If the people of their nation have no balls and cry and whine about it until the government just gives up.

Jimbuna 09-09-07 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spruence M
Only way the english will loose a war these days is the same reason america will loose one.

If the people of their nation have no balls and cry and whine about it until the government just gives up.

Not that I'm 'anti war' mind you :nope: ....but both countries have been doing a fair job of ignoring their people over the Iraq situation :hmm:

fatty 09-09-07 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hakahura
Last time 3 simple unguided Mk8 torpedos found their target, the General Belgrano was sunk and the rest of the Argentinian Navy fled for port. Possibly the most cost effective Naval engament ever? An entire fleet taken out for the cost of 3 vintage torpedos.

Actual UK equipment casualties:

10 (Sea) Harriers
24 helicopters
2 destroyers
2 frigates
1 LSL landing ship
1 LCU amphibious craft
1 containership

Source: wiki. Puts things into a different perspective I think.

Subnuts 09-09-07 10:24 PM

Imperialist fools! With two of Holland's underwater sea devils in the possession of the glorious maritime forces of Venezuela, any English fleet that dare lay by our naval base at Caracas will be instantly vanquished! (Twirls moustache)

Iceman 09-10-07 12:57 AM

Can Venezuela Defeat England?

Venezuela who?

Scraping the bottoms of the barrels with this poll lmao...:rotfl:

Hakahura 09-10-07 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatty
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hakahura
Last time 3 simple unguided Mk8 torpedos found their target, the General Belgrano was sunk and the rest of the Argentinian Navy fled for port. Possibly the most cost effective Naval engament ever? An entire fleet taken out for the cost of 3 vintage torpedos.

Actual UK equipment casualties:

10 (Sea) Harriers
24 helicopters
2 destroyers
2 frigates
1 LSL landing ship
1 LCU amphibious craft
1 containership

Source: wiki. Puts things into a different perspective I think.

Yes those figures are correct fatty.

I was referring to the main "Naval" engagement of that war.

After the sinking of the General Belgrano the Argentinean Navy returned to port for the duration of hostilities. The losses you quote were inflicted by land based aircraft and ground forces.

As this is a Submarine based forum I was trying to illustrate the shear dominance of the SSN in blue water operations.

Stategically the sinking of the General Belgrano was huge. It proved the dangers of approaching the exclusion zone, thus denying resupply from sea. This then left resupply from air as the only option. An option long known to be fraught with difficulty. Even more so if there is only one usable runway.

Today 25 years on the same submarine/s that patrol the oceans have the ability to close airfields themselves. Were a conflict such as the Falklands War to be repeated the antagonists would have to be certain they could eliminate UK SSNs. Whilst not an expert on Venezuelan ASW capability I believe this is a task beyond their reach.

I'll say it again "Sabre Rattling"

Though something else for the UK goverment to keep its eye on.....

Trouble at home, whiping up the population against a foreign power... ect...
Not a new trick in politics, one I'm sure all readers can think of a few examples of throughout history.

Jimbuna 09-11-07 04:27 PM

If it hadn't of been for the loss of the Atlantic Conveyor and the equipment they were preparing to disembark from her, the conflict would have been shortened further :yep:

Happy Times 09-13-07 06:23 PM

With that kind of talk its totally possible he will try to take some of the British, French and Dutch islands of the coast of Venezuela.

And walk the plank in the end :arrgh!:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.