![]() |
Democrats extend troop deployments
"The bottom line is this: Congress’s failure to fund our troops will mean that some of our military families could wait longer for their loved ones to return from the front lines. Others could see their loved ones headed back to war sooner than anticipated. This is unacceptable. It’s unacceptable to me, it’s unacceptable to our veterans, it’s unacceptable to our military families, and it’s unacceptable to many in this country. " - GWB
Ummmmm.....:shifty: Quote:
|
Quote:
-S |
Yesterday Harry Reid said that 'we represent the american people and he doesnt'.
Perhaps some one should give Senator Reid a civics lesson. |
Extremely cheap shot at the democrats in this topic headline. :down:
As a matter of fact the Pentagon announced the decision, which was made by the pentagon, and accoriding governmental and Republican figures. If Bush only would honour the will of the majority of Iraqis ordinary people (who since months said they demand a definite date for withdrawal - we even had a heated debated on that in this forum, many months ago), and if he just would admit that two thirds of Americans, roughly said, are against his policy in general, and handling of Iraq in special, so that Bush just would accept responsibility for a catastrophic military failure, and would agree to name a date within a reasonable timeframe instead of crushing the military more and more for the purpose of chasing follies, then he would have acchieved cooperation with the democrats on the issue of war funds. That's what it will be about in the years to come: getting the troops out and blaiming Republicans rightfully to be responsible for the Iraq mess, while Democrats will be accused of being responsible for not accepting to wage an eternal, lost war for nothing. what it means: American soldiers are risking their lifes for internal American party politics, and get shot for winning voter's marks. Grossartig. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/wo...hp&oref=slogin Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If so, my apology! You just touched an itching allergy of mine :lol:
|
:lol: No worries....
It was a crass way of pointing out that Bush is accusing the Dem's of attempting to extend troop deployments, when obviously we have to do so anyway, per the Pentagon.... Or, in other words, Misleading and Hypocrisy from the President.... |
...And just for the record, I think it's important to point out the the Presidents remarks, and the Pentagons statement came within 24 hrs of each other.
Incredible. Reactions from Dems: Quote:
|
Quote:
EDIT: This looks like I want to argue. Christ no. |
What does chicken little have to say about my country now? Try to stay within your own contry's sh1t chicken little. Unless of course you'd like us to point at yours.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
Meh, Iraq, whatevs.....we'll be in Iran soon anyways..... Might have to re-enlist for that round:hmm:
|
Quote:
Just follow the yellow brick road. |
Quote:
|
I think the general thought as you know or seemed to want to forget is too little too late.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...my&btnG=Search Bottom line is expand the army by 20 brigades and we stand a chance but that also means having thousands of untrained inexperienced troops. All I can do is shrug in frustration and anger. |
The simple fact is that we went in unprepared. We cannot change that.
|
Quote:
Here is the latest poll on the subject. (The point is, please know your facts before you speak.) http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/1606/iraqoy0.gif |
Quote:
http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm the point is, please know your facts, don't try to distort the complete message, do not opportunistically quote out of context and identify your sources for quotes, when you speak. The complete poll expresses resistance to Bush's course from roughly one half up to two thirds of people who got asked. One year ago: http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle12103.htm Four months ago: http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/po...war-falls.html Let's start a poll war, who can show up with more and better links to polls? :-? |
Quote:
It was in response to this Quote:
But hope is not a strategy. Oh, look, a balloon. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.