Missions for Collins Class - Deleted
Hi there,
See Missions and Maps for DW in Downloads section for a file named RAN OS Perisher. |
Awesome, Fearless, I'll check it out ;)
:ping: Stew |
Thx
Quote:
|
https://youtu.be/yFakIvSY6YA
Its only part 1 I played this because in notepad++ i've changed playable sub to Collins SSG 73 Now i'm going to TLAM area - but Collins havent TLAM missiles! Did you change weapon loadout in database? |
Quote:
Quote:
It appears this upload is an issue so it has been removed. My apologies all. One should keep these files personally as it appears to create friction with the original modders. For your future update I suggest you add the 6th Collins Class sub to your database namely the Rankin SSG 78. Also note that The Collins class is a SSG not a SS or SSK submarine. |
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/HQmOeuO.png Quote:
It means - player who join MP session have errors or not the same version of game (for example host uses RA 1.46 but player have RA 1.42) All database differences have major impact on game stability - not only for player with differend version. Literally: it makes many bugs in session and players disconnections In "your" mission nobody cares which "Collins" (Collins, Farncomb, Waller, Dechaineux, Sheean or Rankin) is drivable. Making mission unplayable only because you want to be Capitain of SSG 78 is little ridiculous. BTW it's not "your" missions. You just put Collins class instead LA and made some corrections in briefings. Much easier was to add "playes has choice" attribute to playable platform. |
Quote:
|
Hey, don't be angry on me. I just believe, you didn't know about MP problems. Most MP sessions starts are delayed even 1 hour because some of players has "different database". Mostly they just forgot to apply patch. But sometimes nobody knows why database is different. Many players use different "interface" like red background or russian descriptions on stations. It's more safe than different database - which can broke game for many players.
So i want to prevent every possible errors before game - because i am usually host for players from half of the World. I'm not happy when game crashed because really big battles are announced 1-2 weeks before game - it needs huge preparations for many players (not only software but sometimes preparations in real life like hiring babysitter for child) I hope you will understand my point of view. |
The only reason you don't see player-choice platform is the fact that it is set-up with Rankin start. Changing the starting sub in the mission files will solve the issue.
Also I didn't think the missions were for MP as the original 688H/K and training missions give you no choice whatsoever what platform you could command. Only the 688i. SSN 751. To finish this heated debate off, I apologise for the abrupt responses but do consider how you respond yourself. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BTW i will ask Crazy Ivan for adding Rankin SSG 78 into database. Next version of RA should be released soon :) |
Quote:
I've also asked CrazyIvan on the Reinforce Alert forum to increase the weapons loadout from 18 to 22 as per real life specifications. |
Weapons loadout is not easy to change - its hardcoded value depended on other factors like number of weapon types (if i remember correctly)
Almost all added submarines in RA havent correct number of maximum weapons. 18 its quite enough. On real submarines few torpedoes are dummy ones - for excercises, so lowered number of warheads is acceptable to me. Rankin has been added to RA 1.47 database - info from Crazy Ivan |
Quote:
|
Did you made some tests for game stability?
|
Quote:
|
Is it possible to get your file from somewhere else?
|
"Missions for Collins" were in fact original missions from 688 H/K with changed LA to Collins :(
Really funny, because first or second mission goal was TLAM attack and "creator" of this "new missions for Collins" probably forget about lacking of TLAM missiles onboard Collins class :P Btw 688 H/K missions are adapted to RA - you can find them in scenario folder if you use RA mod. |
Is there a reason why you put creator in brackets? Furthermore what you consider funny is not really of my concern and I rather check for myself and I´m glad for everyone that tries to create content for DW. Besides, when several guys tell you to reconsider your attitude perhaps its indeed worth a try.
Anyways not here for an argument just for the file. |
When you shows someone else work as your work only because you changed title and playable unit (btw incompetently) it is an argument for criticism.
Btw those files werent available to play without messing with database - which may corrupt MP games. It's a shame you don't understand things like intellectual property and copyrights. If you wanna play this original 688 H/K in RA with different platform you can just add in editor: "Player has choice of platform" attribute, and it will work better than "Collins version" because you dont need to mess with database. Quote:
It prevent's me from writing tons of useless advices like people who don't like my style. I know it's painful to you because some time ago i prooved you were wrong and i'm sure you remember this very well. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.