![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When President Donald J. Trump (sorry I just have to do that from now on to tease you over the "he-who-SHALL-not-be-named silliness), was banning travel from China and later Europe, was he being anti-science then? When his sainted opposition like Speaker Pelosi and Mayor Diblasio were telling people to come on down to Chinatown and that going out to lunch at a busy restaurant or taking a packed subway train was safe to do, Trump was appointing pandemic czars and talking about the dangers of the disease in his State of the Union address (that Democrat Pelosi dramatically tore up) who was following the science then?. Given the constant attempts by the Democrats to derail his presidency at every turn it's a wonder he was able to get that much done but it's still way more than you claim. Quote:
If you are not vaccinated yet and you fear getting the disease from a Refusnik, your cat, or in any other way, then just stay home until it's your turn to get the shot. Very simple to do and something that people have already been doing for a whole year. You didn't seem to have a problem with it then. Maybe you do but you have to admit it would be much more effective and easier than trying to tear the nation apart by forcing it on everyone. One final thought here bud. You're so concerned with those who refuse to get the vaccine but what about those where getting the shot will never be medically advisable for whatever reason? Are you going accept a doctors note in place of a vaccine card, especially when they start selling them online like they do Medical Marijuana cards? How do you intend to verify either shot record or doctors excuse note? These "Involuntary Refusniks" (to coin a term) whose welfare that you claim to be so concerned about, they will still be potential carriers. What do we do about them? Permanent quarantine? Mandatory vaccination regardless of health risk? The curious want to know! |
^ well this makes more sense than before
So it all is not your opinion, but what you believe are the refusniks' feelings (lol nice name b.t.w.). Yes i understand the instant urge to be against anything or anyone who wants to lecture me, even (or especially!) if that is obviously right. Like putting a sign next to a lamp post with "You should not pee at this post", just wait what happens next. But I do think something has to be done so the "refusniks" do no infect others, right, This is e.g. what a quarantine is for. If they do not see the necessity, if they do not understand, realize it, or just protest because they think democrats invented this virus hoax, screw them. If people do not want to understand that robbing a bank, infecting others or generally hurt other people is not tolerated by law, in this case you put them into prison, and why the hell not? Because of THEIR freedom? What about mine? What about them hurting others? Regarding aggressiveness i only remind you of anti vaxxer rallies and Taylor Greene, this is a) aggresssive and b) her sheer dumbness indeed gets on my nerves. Quote:
"The anti-vaccine message may have found a particularly receptive audience among some fervent Trump supporters, many of whom flout wearing masks and contend the lethality of the virus is overblown. "It's marketing at a basic sales level," said Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which has analyzed the strategies of anti-vaccine advocates. "Conspiracism that allows you to connect anything together if you want to, because it doesn't require fact." Contrary to the statements of vaccine critics, the two vaccines authorized for emergency use by the US Food and Drug Administration have been shown to be safe and effective." https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/04/p...nvs/index.html Just read it, very good article of how things are, and why. Of course Trump had to do something, to show leadership actively doing some.thing. Like forbidding travel or visits, how long do you think they would have let him in charge without him reacting to the pandemic? But he did it late and because (imho) he had to, not because of real insight. He never publicly supported the scientific "point of view" (what others call truth or at least a reasonable handling), which is why his followers still feel assured with their view that it was all a hoax and all those other conspiracy theories. But then it does not matter what he said yesterday, or today, because a day later he said something contradicting all he said before, when it suited him. Supporters picking what suited them best and willingly ignored all else he said. But then this is how you get a majority, obviously. He followed reason and science as long as it would get him supporters and would make him look better, it never was about "you" or "the people". When Trump felt threatened by Fauci's obvious degree of esteem in the media, he tried to block him. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And, one moment: I did stay at home. Your Trump supporters did not, they made rallies into villages, organised multispreader events and behaved like uneducated children just to show.. what? How FREE they are? Trump wanted to reopen the economy asap, and no one was forced to stay at home, instead all deniers were FREE to walk around. What do you want to say? So you tell me i was right and they were wrong? Fine. Why does anyone here or in the US have to "accept a doctor's not[e] in place of a vaccine card"? Huh? We get vaccine cards here, indeed there are vaccine passes for all if they bother to have one. Most do. So there is an illegal black market for vaccine fake cards or passes. Must be the fault of the democrats? Fauci? The EU? |
Hey look someone is discussing U.S. politics in the German political thread again.
|
"Germany orders maritime patrols for 1.1 billion euros"
Google translation: https://translate.google.com/transla...c-4659fb5da9d8 |
Second order US companies sacked from European customers this week. A few days ago the Swiss have decided against the Rafael, Hornet and Eurofighter and inf aovur of the F-35 as a replacement for their aging air force flying stuff. The Europeans are very angry, thats why I like it. Not only is the data infradstrriuctiure of the F-35 more advanced than that of the other three - but it was also the cheapest offer, cheaper than th Eurofighter, the Swiss say. Who would have thought that!
The F/A-18 is still in the race as a replacement for the Tornado as a carrier of nuclear Germany-stored US bombs, however. But resistence from the Bundestag and even more: the French, is very robust. The French. Once again... Recently I read that the new French-German-Spanish fighter development will be hopelessly outdated already on the day it gets delivered, and that the French know it but want to milk German budgets to finance their won financial industry problems with that German money, thats why they push the project. The cooperation between the manfucaturers of the French MBTs and the German Leopard also favour French interest for transfer of know-how. I really have started wishing there would be fra less indiustrial copperaiuton between Germany and France. The past holds some lessons on these kind of projects, and often they did not ran nice for Germany. The whole German procurement bureaucracy of the Bundeswehr is described to be a desaster. |
Quote:
Doctor Fauci is a bureaucrat, that's what directors are, bureaucrats. I see him as anything but a saint. He engaged in a coverup of covids origins and funded ChiCom biological warfare research being done at the very lab where the outbreak occurred, which kinda explains his coverup efforts. Quote:
From day one Trumps presidency was under siege and it continues even today with the politically motivated investigations in new york state. Quote:
Quote:
Fauci wrote: "Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you." He added: "I do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are going to a very low risk location." Fauci said that in February 2020 the same time that Trump the science hater was banning travel from the epicenter of the outbreak and talking about the dangers of the disease in his state of the union address that the Democrats were so quick to tear up. Quote:
To pursue the policy you suggest they are going to have to physically incarcerate these people in some way. When that happens are you going to hide behind godwin then? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What I was asking is what kind of card or proof will these OTHER unvaccinated people, you know the ones that you are willing to incarcerate, erm excuse me "quarantine", a goodly portion of my vaccine hating fellow citizens in order to protect? What else besides a doctors note would they have to carry or display in order to prove that they should be allowed to walk around unprotected among the vaccinated. But why should exceptions even be made in the first place? After all they are unvaccinated right? So regardless of the reason however reasonable, they are still potential unknowing carriers of the covid disease. That means you will still have to quarantine them regardless of what you do to the Refusniks. Think about that. In this light does it make sense to quarrantine half the country instead of those few people? |
I'd love to see evidence of what you claim, because for me this is the usual Fox news lies parroting.
Quote:
Anyone who gets covid will have to self-quarantine. If they do not and continue to try to infect others, indeed put them into forced quarantine/hospital until they die or get over it. If the latter happens, sue them right afterwards for dangerous negligence or whatever is the term. You cannot force people to be reasonable (especially not with the Fox and qanon indoctrination), you can force no one to get vaccinated of course. But if anti vaxxers die it is their problem. If they infect others, what do you propose? Just let them do it? And if all the rest is vaccinated i have no problem with that, let the deniers walk around and infect themselves, and suffer and die if they want. But as long as the rest is not through with vaccination, what do YOU propose? Quote:
|
Quote:
In my country people don't walk around with a vaccine card but forget it. I give up trying to make you understand. Quote:
Sue :haha:, I see. And how will you know that any particular person gave it to you? Your idea is completely unworkable. Quote:
:roll: Just couldn't resist eh? Quote:
Yes, just let them do it I say, because I am not willing to live in a fascist society where everyone has to show their papers to some government minder just to walk out their own front door. That might the German way but not here in the good old USofA, at least not yet. Quote:
I believe I have given you a perfectly valid solution several times but you have repeatedly ignored it. So let me repeat myself one last time: If you are one of the dwindling number of people that hasn't got the vaccine yet then either stay home and self quarantine until you do get it or go out and take your chances. |
Ok seems i misunderstood you - still when the last willing "vaxer" has got his jab at last and assumed they will all stay at home voluntarily until then, what do you do with the intentionally anti vaxxers? I take it it is not a problem when those make up 3 percent of the population, but what if there are 30 percent or more?
There are now around 54 percent of the population vaccinated in the US, how much are waiting to get a jab and how much will prefer to oppose it, by whatever reason? :hmmm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This channel is really trying paint the EU in the worst possible way, with arousing nationalist feelings using ridiculous exaggeration. "Well done" from an academic point of view, apart from this primitive and lowest niveau :03:
|
Yesterday I read a story, a story I have read before.
It's about a Danish politician, Dan Jørgensen, in EU-Parliament. He is fighting for the animal rights. He wanted a ban on very long animal transport from Denmark/Sweden and other EU countries in the north to South Europe or Turkey. The EU commission demanded 1 million signatures from x different countries in EU. He manage to get it, he got these 1 million signatures from X different countries. He gave these signatures to EU commission...who...just reject it. From what I remember he tried 4-5 times without success. Only people who has something to say is leaders in big companies and they can talk directly to the head of EU. Today they have made some regulation on animal transport, but it's not enough though. Markus |
Bad outcome, if this is true. Do you have a link?
I do not quite believe this, too, maybe there is a formal fault in the petition? But do you think there would have been even a try about such without the EU? With single nationalist governments only caring for their shortsighted individual views :hmmm: |
Quote:
Found an English article http://animalwelfareandtrade.com/ani...ance-transport This article is about Dan Jørgensens 1 million signatures and how the animal is transported. Can't find any article who describe how EU reject these 1 million signatures. I found a Danish article Hope you can use google translate https://sn.dk/Danmark/Dansk-EU-parla...artikel/340714 Markus |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.