Originally Posted by sergbuto

That was not meant for your ears or use because that's "illegal". :rotfl:

Originally Posted by sandbag69

Name one stock ship that was not used against U-Boats!

Its Russian Destroyers that are needed from the Ruskies not a KGV battleship and a hipper clone which had no impact what so ever onthe u-baot war.

Originally Posted by Cdre Gibs

But according to you, if the ship had no impact on the Ubaot war, its of no value to be included into SH3. So by your very own standards that ship is therefore crap and a waste of space and should never have been made and you wont be using it. Isnt that correct!

Same can be said of the above. As to what stock ships had no impact in the Uboat war, ohhh just about every capital ship (baring Escort Carrier's) in SH3, but you must already know that hey.......NO?

Originally Posted by Cdre Gibs

Same can be said of the above. As to what stock ships had no impact in the Uboat war, ohhh just about every capital ship (baring Escort Carrier's) in SH3, but you must already know that hey.......NO?

Originally Posted by Cdre Gibs

Dont get me wrong guys, I'm all for more ships, of any kind. Its sandbag69 thats living up to his name, sand between the ears.

Originally Posted by sandbag69

Bismark's breakout.....Donitz positioned U-boats to help it try to escape the british Battleships. Therefore these ships had an effect on the u-boats.

British aircraft carriers were sunk in the Med by U-boats....Therefore these had effect on u-boats.

Nelson and Rodney were both torpedoed bu u-boats ....but the torps didnt do enough damage to sink them. Therefore they had an effect on u-boats.

Royal Oak....Revenge Class Battleship....sunk at Anchor in Scapa Flow. need I go on.

get your facts right before you make personal insults.

Originally Posted by Cdre Gibs

But according to you, if the ship had no impact on the Ubaot war, its of no value to be included into SH3. So by your very own standards that ship is therefore crap and a waste of space and should never have been made and you wont be using it. Isnt that correct!

Originally Posted by Wulfmann

Not crap but that is accurate for game play. It would be nice to see more of what we flood our tubes for.

However, please, please, please where is the link to that beautiful Panzerschiffe???
Who cares about all the above that is so cool I would just want to put it in port and stare at it as I leave each time and say nice things about the artist that generously allowed us to gaze upon it!!!.:rock:

Wulfmann

Originally Posted by Wulfmann

And, since SW Med has the 23rd Flotilla out of Salamis and 30th out of Constanza now and Greywolves is copying that how is that any different?

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann

Wulfmann has been associated with the X-1 payware mod interests for quite some time and posts this sort of dribble at Subsim.com all the time. Pure and simple X-1 fanboyism. I personally view the X-1 group as freeware mod thieves. His post that I have quoted is just more of the same. He will quite possibly spew more gibberish here and at Subsim following this post. If and when he does, it will only be more rivet-counting and picking at something he did not build himself.

Regarding X-1's sad little venture... It modifies only the Mediterranean elements of the simulator. We began work on our current project soon after the release of GW 1.0

LOL, you can all be assured that we are copying no-one. We have a strong enough team to determine our own destiny. The fact that we have also re-written our own Mediterranean Ops is purely coincidental... Furthermore, we have added two entirely new operational theaters and three new U-boat flotillas. You WILL have access to these things in GWX without losing ONE BIT of access to current flotillas and/or operations. The Black Sea and Indian Ocean operations will be complete in a matter of days.

The flotilla scripting itself IS COMPLETE and functional already. It is my understanding that the X-1 project sacrifices availability of flotillas that patrol the Atlantic in order to re-name and re-script them for the Mediterranean.

To all others, I am sorry for my relative silence. I am quite literally swamped with PM's and public messages that will all be addressed in time. I hope you understand that I must dedicate the vast majority of my time working with the GWX dev team and project.

A final couple of notes... Over the last few months we have listened closely to the entire community regarding problems with GW. Try to remember that while not every single suggestion can be implemented into GWX... we do read and often emply them.

Secondly, "Freeware mod" does not mean "built by idiots." The GWX freeware mod dev team has some of the best coders, 3D modelers, and artists available in the Subsim.com modding community.

Regarding the release date everyone keeps asking about... We will be done when we are done... (no offense to anyone is meant)

We have a set number of targets we are going to hit before release. It will be worth the wait.
We are not going to rush it out of the door for any player. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies...miley-wink.gif

Feel free to consider our project about 80% complete though. (...and the things we have chosen to talk about are only the barest tip of the iceberg... much remains ultra-secret!)

Cheers for now.

Kpt. Lehmann
GWX Project Manager

Originally Posted by JScones

Actually, as the guy who has primarily built the new flotilla files for GWX, I can assure you that I have not in any way, shape or form, looked at any file from either of the Seawolves products, nor do I intend to.

However, I was waiting for some naive "copying" accusation, and I knew it would come from you.

You of all people should know that, quite simply, there are certain obvious flotilla exclusions from SH3. The 23rd and 30th Flotillas are two of them. Likewise Gruppe Monsun (represented in GWX as 10 Flotilla, which was one of the three flotillas that committed boats to SE Asia) and 13 Flotilla at Trondheim. I have facilitated the addition of these obvious flotillas without compromising any current flotilla (with the exception of 10 Flotilla from Aug '43).

Now there are other obvious flotilla exclusions such as 3 Flotilla, however, adding others would mean compromising the stock SH3 flotillas, which was not an option.

GWX players will have access to 1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 23, 29, 30 and 33 Flotillas. Do SW:Med players?

So your "copying" accusations are truly humourous and simply show your desperation to deflect the real copying accusations which are being levelled at SW:Med over at Subsim as we speak (and curiously accusations which you have not attempted to defend).