Hughes for the pint, Tig Coili for the music:Kaleun_Cheers:

Since bubbles is still flailing away with more stuff instead of rethinking his claims in the complete absence of anything apart from hearsay of hearsay of hearsay which we can safely deduct he heard about on some loony blog.
Lets try this word game.
Run through the definitions of tax bubbles.
Post again when you have swallowed your words.

I think we should also examine Dr. Garrows history of claims:

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2013/...y-2456648.html

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=13046

http://www.westernjournalism.com/author/drjgarrow/

https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/...zionist-trail/

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/citizens.asp

Aaaaaaand the real kicker:
http://poundpuplegacy.org/node/45036

Doctor? :hmmm: Doesn't look like it. other than from a box top "university" of theology.

Nobel nominee? We'll know in about 2060 when the 2010 nominations are released, but he claims someone told him he was on the list of nominees which conveniently is kept secret for 50 years after nominations are made. BTW that's secret even from the nominees. BTW anyone including Bubbles could be nominated, but it doesn't mean they've got a snowballs chance in Hell of winning one.

His "charity" is not registered as such and looks like a funding front for his Chinese child trafficking racket.

Certainly not a reliable witness for the prosecution your honour.

Now you are just rubbing salt into his well flayed hide Tarjak.
That's naughty:rotfl2:

So, after all this nonsense, it turns out that Bubblehead isn't even claiming to have any verifiable evidence that any of this is true - but he thinks it is true because it fits in with all the other things he imagines that Obama is doing but doesn't have any evidence for either...

This thread just got sad.

I mean good work, TarJak.

Have any of the men removed from their posts said anything similar? You say it "appears to you" that this is so. Based on what evidence?

How real? Despite fact that the charges made against Admiral McChrystal are criminal in nature you think they are unjust? You haven't been very specific about your objections to these laws. At first you dismissed the accusation as being only "for gambling". When shown that the charge of using counterfeit chips was more than just "for gambling", you tried to equate "gambling" and "poker chips" with the intent of dismissing the charge as minor. Using counterfeit poker chips is no different than using counterfeit money. Are you saying that that law deserves your contempt? Several people have been careful to point out flaws in your arguments. Rather than answer any of those points you talk about "your detractors". Everyone is still waiting for you to show any real evidence for what you claim. So far you have none.

Again you try to dismiss the McChrystal charge, not by showing that he is innocent (which may still turn out to be the case) but by making vague claims about "some laws". Please be specific and show how laws against counterfeiting poker chips is idiotic, ridiculous or just outright unjust. Please show how the UCMJ's rule on officers criticizing their CinC are idiotic, ridiculous or just outright unjust. I'm not being a detractor at all, at least not to you personally. Your arguments, on the other hand, in my estimation deserve detraction. You've shown nothing concrete at all, yet you still insist your claims are true. They may well be, but you need to show something here.

How can you guys be mad at the same man that starts a thread about: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...=208393&page=4

Your favorite Star Trek movie?

He does get to you doesn't he, but look at it this way he is a reason to make sure that you are right when you counter point his claims with links. If he reads them or not I do not know, but I get a kick out of watching the horse and pony show he produces.

Without bubblehead you wouldn't have anyone to bash now would you?

You should be ashamed of yourselves :oops: and apologize to him for causing so much humor in your daily lives :yep:

Keep up the good work bubblehead just check to make sure your right next time that's all they are asking. They just want a better sparing partner :D

OhOh...smoking gun...:/\\!!


http://imageshack.us/a/img209/5638/wwyl.jpg

He also has started several good threads in the SH4 forums, and contributed to many others.

Me? Not at all, nor am I mad at him. I also have nothing against him. I will debate any topic I have an interest in. In this case I take exception to someone claiming that what he says is the truth yet not being able to back it up even a little bit. Personal opinion is not fact, and believing something is not the same as knowing it.

or we really sure that President Obama is from Chicago?

He can fool most people in a New York minute :woot:

Sir. what's so wonderful about GT, is that in some of the threads we almost rip each others head of and in some we are great friends sharing the same interest.

Markus

On the contrary....GT is useful because it keeps a lot of rubbish from spilling over into other areas of the forum.

The GT Collection Pond? If you want to play bring your Hazmat suit.

http://assets1.bigthink.com/system/i...jpg?1369165846