SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 5 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=244)
-   -   New screenshots available (1/14/10) (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=160233)

HundertzehnGustav 01-18-10 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karamazovnew (Post 1238852)
Gustav, what's with that sig bro? Why not use it after you actually play SH5? It might even be "SH5 is the shizzle, yo"

just havin a little fun...
and spreadin neg-uh-tiviti around...:O:

Sailor Steve 01-18-10 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quad5 (Post 1238940)
30 cm...For a simulator it is inadmissible! :down:

More like trivial.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sgtmonkeynads
" Up scope....."
"Merchant spotted..,range..500 meters,30 degrees port"
"Ready tubes 1 and 3...fire on my mark...FIRE....."
"Sorry Sir, our Wintergarten is about 20 cm too high....."
" Dang....abandon ship.":dead:

:rotfl2::rock:

HundertzehnGustav 01-18-10 03:11 PM

to me the question is compared to the Men - the Men would need rails to keep them falling from the deck in storm conditions, but these rails seem to be chest-high, compared to "Peter the average-tall Kriegsmarine watchman"

A thing that comes to mind: can we point the Oerlikon anyway we want, and shoot? i mean
-lower than horizontal
-horizontal to the front, endangering our own watchcrew

or will we be prevented to shoot the WO by error?

kapitan_zur_see 01-18-10 03:51 PM

Am I the only one to find this height question of mere interest, mundane if not of trivial matter, and going too far in this thread?? :yawn:

People, you're not going to die over this... I sometimes wonder how devs still find the enthusiasm to release screenshots if not for marketing purpose only given the amount of criticism generated for mere details

mookiemookie 01-18-10 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kapitan_zur_see (Post 1239326)
Am I the only one to find this height question of mere interest, mundane if not of trivial matter, and going too far in this thread?? :yawn:

People, you're not going to die over this... I sometimes wonder how devs still find the enthusiasm to release screenshots if not for marketing purpose only given the amount of criticism generated for mere details

The funny thing is to see how outraged some people get over it.

psykopatsak 01-18-10 05:08 PM

and how everyone mentions some random Tomi-guy like he was a god. GO PROGRAM THE GAME YOURSELF!

MH 01-18-10 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1239333)
The funny thing is to see how outraged some people get over it.


size matters :yep:

kapitan_zur_see 01-18-10 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MH (Post 1239463)
size matters :yep:

:rotfl2:

Quote:

Originally Posted by psykopatsak (Post 1239387)
and how everyone mentions some random Tomi-guy like he was a god. GO PROGRAM THE GAME YOURSELF!

Tomi has done a very good work with his 3d engine room, no doubt about it!, but one that rose many bitter expectations and "frustrations" since it has more or so stayed as a WIP since the cancellation of GWX4... Hence it has gone some sort of "what if" legend, thus the quoting of Tomi everywhere...
Now I agree that he's not god himself, and that his work, though very good indeed could very well be made by some other guys. Still, his commitment to details that looks already beyond what SH5 looks like in those interior screenies serves as a standard to "judge" what SH5 should/could achieve.

Anyway I still get your point. No need pesting about mundane details and turns angry and bitter about anything just because some are over-reacting toward SH5 cheesy marketing.

People, lighten up and wait&see for the small details... As far as development is not finished, only the big pictures should matter! Don't waste your day over this!!

HundertzehnGustav 01-18-10 07:00 PM

never. the raiils we can do ourselves if it bugs us so much...

V.C. Sniper 01-18-10 10:19 PM

I h8 subs on rail

quad5 01-19-10 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flakmonkey (Post 1239213)
Given the amount of variation on real type7 boats thanks to different ship yards building them and occasionally even material availability and shortages a paltry 20cm difference from the original blueprint is perfectly feasible, do people really imagine that every type7 was an exact clone of every other?!?

Show me at least one archival photo on which type 7 "С" corresponds to game model?!!:|\\

quad5 01-19-10 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kapitan_zur_see (Post 1239326)
Am I the only one to find this height question of mere interest, mundane if not of trivial matter, and going too far in this thread?? :yawn:

Interesting position...
I cannot understand a simple thing: if UBI used contemporary records and real drawings why they cannot make exact the deck on the model in game?:shifty:

It is a simple question.:yep:

kptn_kaiserhof 01-19-10 09:18 AM

on the forth pic what class carrier is that

Apos 01-19-10 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kptn_kaiserhof (Post 1239838)
on the forth pic what class carrier is that

I bet it is Illustrious, but why it has UK flag and american planes on it?

Kapitanleutnant 01-19-10 05:10 PM

I thought you were all being a great big bunch of whiners, groaning about a 30cm difference in turm height.
That is, until I found out that the VII will be the only type in the game. The fact that there's only one boat type, and that they can't even get that right, is astonishing to me.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.