SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Why Atheism Is Morally Bankrupt - A thought since we are celebrating Christs birth... (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=145878)

Stealth Hunter 12-25-08 05:26 AM

When you take a step back and really look at it all, it boggles your mind doesn't it? It troubles me to think that such great amounts of knowledge ARE available for us to discover, but we don't have the ability to discover them; it's a teasing sensation.

Letum 12-25-08 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike
[...] the concept of a god is a very logical conclusion to a very real question. One could even call it the "God Theory". I don't believe that it is the right conclusion, but the data doesn't invalidate the theory. In the case of the "Chocolate Teapot" or the "Pink Unicorn", these things are conclusions to nothing and we have data that would make such theories invalid.

It isn't too hard to replace the chocolate unicorn with something that was once used
to answer real questions. There are many magical beasts/people/places/objects that
have been used to explain the world we find our selves in that all seam as outlandish
as the chocolate unicorn.

As for god being a 'very logical' answer...well, yes and no. Ideas about god/gods
predate ideas about logic and rationality by a long time. So god was never a logical
answer so much as a natural answer born of the way we understand the world
through anthromorphization. In many ways god is the universe: anthromorphised.

Aramike 12-25-08 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter
When you take a step back and really look at it all, it boggles your mind doesn't it? It troubles me to think that such great amounts of knowledge ARE available for us to discover, but we don't have the ability to discover them; it's a teasing sensation.

Indeed.

I've been recently revisiting Einstein's theory General Relativity. Setting the freakishly impossible math aside (Einstein himself employed mathemeticians to help with the equations), I think people don't truly grasp the enormity of it all. Just the distances neccessary to calculate gravitational pulls are tremendous. Here we are in tiny little corner of the Milky Way, one star amongst billions. Our galaxy just one amongst billions. And we can hardly make it to our moon.

It's enough to make anyone feel insignificant.

I feel that teasing sensation. Everytime I hear about the discovery of another planet, I wonder what it looks like. I wonder if the light speed barrier will ever be broken, knowing that it won't happen in my lifetime. It's so easy to imagine the grandeur waiting for us out there, so I find it so hard to accept that we'll probably never know it.

A little depressing, I guess. But hey, at least there still are some mysteries left.

Aramike 12-25-08 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Letum
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike
[...] the concept of a god is a very logical conclusion to a very real question. One could even call it the "God Theory". I don't believe that it is the right conclusion, but the data doesn't invalidate the theory. In the case of the "Chocolate Teapot" or the "Pink Unicorn", these things are conclusions to nothing and we have data that would make such theories invalid.

It isn't too hard to replace the chocolate unicorn with something that was once used
to answer real questions. There are many magical beasts/people/places/objects that
have been used to explain the world we find our selves in that all seam as outlandish
as the chocolate unicorn.

As for god being a 'very logical' answer...well, yes and no. Ideas about god/gods
predate ideas about logic and rationality by a long time. So god was never a logical
answer so much as a natural answer born of the way we understand the world
through anthromorphization. In many ways god is the universe: anthromorphised.

It's all about context, I believe. I don't entirely disagree with you, but we have to frame the question within the context in which it was asked.

Sure, mystical beasts of all different kinds were used to explain all different things in times predating logic. But we must look at what was being explained. At those times, rain itself was a mystery. Why did the sky turn dark at night? In those contexts, the Chocolate Unicorn could very well circle the sun.

Fast forward to now, we know the the Chocolate Unicorn would melt. We know what causes the rain. We understand why day turns into night.

Moreso, we've just begun to grasp the basics of Everything. But, there are some things we just don't get. One example (that personally troubles me) is the nature of life itself. Evolution is a FACT. Science has shown time and time again that life has evolved to survive and thrive in its environment. However, what science has yet to explain is WHY does this nature occur?

I find it to be quite similar to Newton's model of gravity. His observations are quite accurate and even NASA still uses his physics today. However, Newton himself had no idea WHY gravity occurred. It wasn't until Einstein that we started to get an idea.

I don't doubt that we'll someday understand what governs the behavior of life itself. But, until then, I can't rule out the possibility of God. Even if I don't really believe it to be true.

Letum 12-25-08 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike
Quote:

I see it like this, if god is omnipotent and omniscient, he must also be infinitely complex (and this idea is also argued by religious persons). Henceforth, it makes his spontaneous existence far less likely than the universe simply coming into existence, which has finite complexity. And what can explain complexity? Natural selection. What has evidence to support it? Natural selection. What can explain complexity but does not have evidence? God.
I can't really argue this because I don't really disagree.

Heh, unless we want to get in a physics discussion using quantum string theory... :doh:

I will have a go at disagreeing with it. ;)

As I understand it the argument runs as follows:

1) God is infinitely complex
2) The universe is finitely complex
3) Therefor god is more complex than the universe

4) Before the occurrence of a god or of a universe, entropy was higher than the state
after the occurrence of a god or a universe.
5) More complex things are in lower entropy states than less complex things
6) Changes from high entropy to low entropy are less likely the larger the change
7) Therefore the occurrence of a god is less likely than the occurrence of a universe

4 bothers me. I agree that universes must spring from high entropy states, but most
deists tend to claim that god is infinatly old. If this is the case then there can never
have been a entropy state higher than the one in which he/she/it is present.

More broadly, the idea that complexity is related to entropic likelihood bothers me.
That is the same fallacy that lead to the idea of the Boltzmann brain.
It is flawed because it is perfectly possible to have a low complexity system that has
lower entropy than a highly complex system. Complexity is not something that can
be objectively judged.

Letum 12-25-08 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnderseaLcpl
If space is infinitely large, then the universe, which does not have infinite mass or energy, is infinitely dense, relative to the infinite size of space. It cannot be otherwise, because space is infinite, but it is otherwise, suggesting that space is not infinite.

You can do a lot more math with infinite values than you might imagine. It is quite
possible to show that a infinite volume containing an infinite mass is not infinatly
dense.
The reason for this is that one infinite value can be bigger than another infinite value.

That can be a little hard to understand at first.
Try to imaging a ruler that extends across an infinite length. Every 1m there is a
green ball and every 100m there is a red ball. There is therefore an infinite number of
red and green balls. However there are 100 times more green balls than there are
red.
You will always find 100 green balls for every red you find, but you will find an
infinite number of both kinds of ball. The fact that you find an infinite number of
both types of ball does not change the fact that there are 100 green to every red.

An infinite volume containing an infinite mass does not have an infinite density
because the infinite volume value is not the same as the infinite mass value.

*edit* I have been looking up the maths again and it gave me a painful reminder
of what a bitch it is to use in practice.
Also, apologies for the double post.


*edit2*
Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike
However, what science has yet to explain is WHY does this nature occur?

I don't understand. Why does what occur?

Subnuts 12-25-08 08:01 AM

This thread has gone on too long.

So I thought you'd all like to see a picture I took this weekend of Jesus placed in a ZipLock sandwich bag and stapled to a telephone pole.

http://i43.tinypic.com/vxn1fs.jpg

Ironically, this is pretty similar to how the original Jesus died.

Mikhayl 12-25-08 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subnuts
Ironically, this is pretty similar to how the original Jesus died.

Stifled with a ziplock sandwich bag ?

Digital_Trucker 12-25-08 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikhayl
Quote:

Originally Posted by Subnuts
Ironically, this is pretty similar to how the original Jesus died.

Stifled with a ziplock sandwich bag ?

I think he meant the part about being stapled to a telephone pole:D

Iceman 12-25-08 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter
Quote:

Originally Posted by Iceman
Where's the "Dead sea bing big bang badaboo Scrolls" ?..there is nothing, but theory's created by man in the last few hundred yrs...good luck with dat. :up:

You haven't taken a look at the evidence for the Big Bang, have you?

First of all, we know that the universe had to have a "beginning", if you will.

Second, galaxies are moving away from us at speeds relative to their distance. This is known as "Hubble's Law". This observation supports the expansion of the universe and suggests that the universe was once compacted.

Third, if the universe was initially very, very hot as the Big Bang suggests, we should be able to find some remnant of this heat. In 1965, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a 2.725* kelvin CMB which pervades the observable universe. This is absolute proof that the Big Bang occured (note that Penzias and Wilson were given the Nobel Prize in 1978 for their discoveries and achievments in physics).

Finally, the abundance of the lighter elements hydrogen and helium found in the observable universe do support the basic ideas the Big Bing Theory proposes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iceman
Faith the grain of a mustard seed unlocks unlimited power ... E=MC2
God is light = infinity and speed of light accomplished...hence time does not apply nor exsist.
Time has a begining,middle and end...so Einstein concluded...rightly so.

Prove me wrong...but heck sure fits better than a big bang idea in the sense evolutionists present anyways..

My god, the man must be a genius. Get me Switzerland. We've got to relay this information to Zurich ASAP.

:roll:

Kent Hovind proposed similar comparisons in his video series that shows "evidence" for creation. I hope you can think more logically than Mr. Hovind can...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iceman
Thousands of years of stories and writings passed down by the ages to lend creedence to the "Creation theory" are a safe bet.

Then we should all be following the Mesopotamian views on religion. Lets all make monthly sacrifices to praise Gilgamesh and his supreme god-father.

Seriously, you believe in the idea of creation, which proposes that Earth and the universe and everything in it was created 6,000 years ago by an, invisible magic man in the sky?

I have no trouble with people believing in this invisible, magical sky-man (I certainly am skeptical of it and oppose the idea when people try to force it in places that it doesn't belong... like in schools), but the idea that everything is 6,000 years old is preposterous. We've known for half a century that our planet is 4.5 billion years old, not 6,000...

Let there be light and there was light...you think about that.

Man wrestles with the problem of moving at the speed of light in order to reach "Somewhere" else in the universe and concedes without speed of light travel it will fail...youll never make it to even the closest star in a lifetime...quit thinking so small.

Travel need not be in physcial form as we know it and as far as all science figures it can't be....maybe there is something to this spiritual stuff after all huH?

Wow a new concept?

Amen! Merry Christmas!

Grain of a mustard seed Stealth...grain of a mustard seed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Ipb8-CLDM

Zachstar 12-25-08 03:24 PM

You know Subman.. I tried. I honestly tried to read that huge sack of steamy bull turds but the smell was too much. I know you peddle in such Subman but how smelly can you get?

August 12-25-08 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital_Trucker
I think he meant the part about being stapled to a telephone pole:D


Technically that wasn't what killed him. It was that spear jab to the heart.

Iceman 12-25-08 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital_Trucker
I think he meant the part about being stapled to a telephone pole:D


Technically that wasn't what killed him. It was that spear jab to the heart.

Nope it was not that either...it was voluntary...that was I believe something they did after they were finally done torturing someone and wanted to go do something else.

John 10
17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. 18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

John 19
30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.


31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. 32 Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. 33 But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs: 34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. 35 And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe. 36 For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. 37 And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.

August 12-26-08 12:35 AM

I stand corrected.

saltysplash 12-26-08 03:56 AM

Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving...
...and revolving at 900 miles an hour
That's orbiting at 19 miles a second, so it's reckoned...
a sun that is the source of all our power
The sun, and you and me, and all the stars that we can see
Are moving at a million miles a day
In an outer spiral-arm, at 40,000 miles an hour...
Of the galaxy we call the Milky Way


Our galaxy itself contains a hundred-billion stars
It's a hundred-thousand light-years side to side
It bulges in the middle, 16-thousand light years thick
but out by us it's just 3-thousand light years wide
We're 30-thousand light years from galactic central point
we go round every two-hundred-million years
And our galaxy is only one of millions of billions
In this amazing and expanding universe


The universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding
In all of the directions it can whizz

As fast as it can go, at the speed of light, you know
12-million miles-a-minute, and that's the fastest speed there is
So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure
How amazingly unlikely is your birth

And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space
'cos there's bugger-all down here on Earth


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.