SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   SH4 Mods Workshop (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=219)
-   -   All members read this (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=138774)

bigboywooly 07-04-08 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Digital_Trucker
Real life interrupted for a few minutes or I would have added the following to my post directed to BBW. Regarding the points made about oneupsmanship, how can you repudiate a statement without knowing what the statement means?

BTW Nitpicking

1.to be excessively concerned with or critical of inconsequential details. –verb (used with object) 2.to criticize by focusing on inconsequential details. –noun 3.a carping, petty criticism. –adjective 4.of, pertaining to, or characteristic of a nitpicker or nitpicking. Also, nit-pick.

is not what I was doing when I answered the question that you asked (the definition of oneupsmanship).

You are correct in one respect though, this whole thing is going nowhere if we can't communicate and honestly listen to one another.

Edit: Once again, I type too slowly. Amen to the "all get along" sentiment.

I wasnt refering to you when I said nitpicking but ALL in general :up:
We will get stuck on the small matters without moving forward

Some points people will never agree on however we ALL need to agree the theatre v theatre\flaming and baiting has to stop

The ATO will be appearing in the mods forum on a more regular basis than has done till now and the situation will only get worse unless something is done

A seperate forum may go a long way to helping but members need to make the change too

AVGWarhawk 07-04-08 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Penelope_Grey
Quote:

Provocation and baiting come from both.
Everything else you said is ok AVG... except that ^

No it doesn't. It comes from a hardcore who do not want U-Boat fans or U-Boat people like the Grey Wolves in the SH4 section, that message has been plain. I'm not saying that myself or my friends are perfect and saints... far from it... but one thing myself and others don't do is come here deliberately looking for a fight... but when they happen there is reputation to think of... and if somebody posts things to make me or my friends look bad...

I accept that by answering these people we are fanning the flames... trying to put the perverbial fire out with petrol. But if I came here and said that you were...I don't know... lets say I came and quietly and discreetly questioned your sexuality... You knew what I was talking about and came in and said, "no you are totally wrong and bang out of order" then bam I post back, you post back! Before you know it... its erupted. Versuvius has blown! This is what has been happening.

Its tiresome and pointless. More to the point, its downright frightening to me, things like this, post exchanges that are heated scare me because I never know what I am going to see next and I am afraid what people will think of me or say to me...

So why do we come here if we like U-Boats then??
LIke I have stated before I enjoy SH3 and SH4... SH3 more so yes... Grey Wolves is coming to SH4. What is built for SH4 will be released and it will be for everybody, no strings attached just as it was in the past. We all now have a vested insterest in SH4 all of us... everybody reading or posting in this thread, its the main reason I have came here to participate despite my unease... we approach from a different angles... but what we are hoping to do, is provide a choice, an alternative. Today you can sail a Tambor Class... tomorrow, you can sail a Type IXC... In an absolutely stunning graphical engine... The possibilities... wow! Who knows... somebody might create a mod where you sail as a British sub... maybe an Italian sub... where does it stop?

That has got to be better than saying its our way or none at all and petitions and what not. We (U-Boat fans) are not the enemies of SH4, we are not the enemies of the PTO but sometimes are treated like we are worse yet... at times, I have started to believe it... you guys arent' the allies and we aren't the axis... I think we are engrossed in our simulations a little too far.

For my point of view... I don't mind the PTO I'd rather be on the conning tower of a IXC than a Gato... yes!

BUT!

I don't want to rubbish anybody's fun... and I sure as hell do not want to see the obliteration or subjecation of the Fleet Boat element.

One thing we all have in common, we all have a vested interest in SH4

This is the exact reason we have come to this juncture Penelope. We want peace for all in both theaters. Having a member such as yourself frighten by what you might find with your next visit is not what the forums are about. So, we are looking to remedy the situation. All nonsense aside, I really do believe a forum for each theater concerning modding SH4 is needed and at hand. As far as a moderator, that is up to Neal.

AVGWarhawk 07-04-08 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna
Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Channing
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Channing
And no one should confuse the generous amount of tolerance and forbearance that has been shown up to now with they way things are going to be in the future.

Nice threat.

You are welcome to interpret it anyway you like.

It was meant only as a statement of fact.

JCC

Possibly or possibly not. But either way, definitely surpassed by this previous one;

Quote:

The podium is open for suggestions and resolutions. Thus far, my vote is for a separate forum concerning the uboats and the fleets. Lets face it, some members just like one or the other. For some reason, it does not mix well in the same pot. I believe these members should be able to enjoy the theater of their choice without having to dig through threads that do not interest them. I'm also casting a vote for the ban function and immediately deploying the ban.
I've sat back most of the day and followed this thread with a great sense of sadness.

I believe there may well be a way out of this mess for us all....and by that I mean the entire community.

Allow me to make a few observations and comments as a means to aide myself:

First point....Read Neals first post
Quote:

Just a friendly reminder, play nice, no sarcastic comments to others, don't start any flame wars.
Q: Check around the threads and see who the instigator is in the vast majority of occasions. The one that enters the room, drops a derogitory or sarcastic comment or even something smelly before beating a hasty exit and watching the ensuing turmoil that unfolds.

Neal himself has already stated that
Quote:

Up through the present day it appears there are a handful of people who look for a chance to take a shot at GW, and that's something I've had to address with a few people several times--subtle verbal attacks, outright abusive name-calling, and posting an image that conveys an insult, and GW cannot restrain from responding
It happens, whether you agree with me or not.

What is the usual consequence ?

A moderator closes the thread down.

I find it sadly strange that they are predominantly U-boat threads in the SH4 area.

Could a conspiracy theory eminate from this ?

Who knows?

I try to adhere to my RL training and instincts and keep an open but inquisitive mind.

A possible question that usually arises from the above is....Could there be an element of bias here in favour of SH4?

Possibly, especially when you consider that those moderating in the SH3 threads all play and spend far more time in the SH4 sections.

Now don't get me wrong, I am not calling any moderators honesty or integrity into question here, but I believe there is reasonable potential for a certain element of doubt when you consider that one of your good selves is a moderator on a certain forum that is seriously anti U-boat.

A forum that has numerous posts that are objectionable and subjective and go so far in places to call Neals honesty and integrity into question.

Never have I witnessed said moderator exercise their authority over there with such speed and zeal in closing down a thread or dampening a brush fire as quickly as I have witnessed on SS.

It would appear that members of said forum can post whatever venomous trash they like with total impunity to any consequences. It's usually accompanied with encouragement and additional ridicule from others.

In fact if I'm going to be challenged shortly after posting I think it also appropriate that I point out that I and others have actually read the odd negative post against SH3 by said inividual.

A question of credibility arises here and does little more than add weight to the concerns of those currently working on GWX4.

What is desperately needed is a moderator that enjoys the confidence and trust of so many instead of the current situation, which IMHO is not tenable.

(Please observe no reference or detail attached from any of our PM's)

Mr Robbins........You come across as so plausible, affable and conciliatory in your posts here.

Think again before continuing with the hypocricy.

What gives you the right to be so dishonest to so many on SS.

I find your attitude an afront to everyones intelligence on SS.

What you post here and what you post on another couple of forums are distinctly different.

Your comments 'from the peanut gallery' are often sadly, a source of entertainment to many.

I especially liked the one when you were boasting how you had fooled everyone into searching for a link which you deliberately pointed to another site where you are actively involved in encouraging people to leave SS.

You can wriggle whichever way you want.....but be the decent human being I'm sure you are, and don't insult the intelligence of myself and so many others here.

I'm deeply saddened at some of the detail I've posted here, mainly because I hoped it wouldn't be necessary to go down this route.

The point I'm trying to make is.....we will never come to a satisfactory conclusion that is acceptable to all if we aren't prepared to be open, honest and transparent with each other from the outset.

SS and it's community is far more important than all the people from either side of this sad divide.

REMEMBER!!......NONE OF US ARE AS CLEVER AS ALL OF US!!

Jim,

We are not here to for character assassinations or pointing out what you believe to be a short fall in someones idea of a good post. We are here attempting to solve a problem and make all happy to be here posting. Please be a voice in answering to the problem and not a continuation of it. Penelope and bigboywooly are helping in creating the answer for all. Follow suit if you will. To be honest, Neal is at his wits end and other life changing things are happening to Neal at present. Let resolve this, move on and allow Neal to sort his future. Neal and moderators are looking of answers to satify all.

Your suggestions and recommendations to further bolster friendship and developing he game are needed here.

I am well versed on Neals current personal position and I wish him all the the good fortune in the world. But this is not the issue here.

What saddens me is this is precisely the sort of dismissive response I anticipated.

What I do and my other dealings are not on trial here. I'm sure I have been discussed at the 'lair' more than once. Going down this 'route' you're hoping you do not have to looks to be more destructive then constructive. This is why a dismissive response. Perhaps listening to Penelope and her concerns/ideas and developing them for a common ground might be the best route at this time.

Jimbuna 07-04-08 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna
Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Channing
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Channing
And no one should confuse the generous amount of tolerance and forbearance that has been shown up to now with they way things are going to be in the future.

Nice threat.

You are welcome to interpret it anyway you like.

It was meant only as a statement of fact.

JCC

Possibly or possibly not. But either way, definitely surpassed by this previous one;

Quote:

The podium is open for suggestions and resolutions. Thus far, my vote is for a separate forum concerning the uboats and the fleets. Lets face it, some members just like one or the other. For some reason, it does not mix well in the same pot. I believe these members should be able to enjoy the theater of their choice without having to dig through threads that do not interest them. I'm also casting a vote for the ban function and immediately deploying the ban.
I've sat back most of the day and followed this thread with a great sense of sadness.

I believe there may well be a way out of this mess for us all....and by that I mean the entire community.

Allow me to make a few observations and comments as a means to aide myself:

First point....Read Neals first post
Quote:

Just a friendly reminder, play nice, no sarcastic comments to others, don't start any flame wars.
Q: Check around the threads and see who the instigator is in the vast majority of occasions. The one that enters the room, drops a derogitory or sarcastic comment or even something smelly before beating a hasty exit and watching the ensuing turmoil that unfolds.

Neal himself has already stated that
Quote:

Up through the present day it appears there are a handful of people who look for a chance to take a shot at GW, and that's something I've had to address with a few people several times--subtle verbal attacks, outright abusive name-calling, and posting an image that conveys an insult, and GW cannot restrain from responding
It happens, whether you agree with me or not.

What is the usual consequence ?

A moderator closes the thread down.

I find it sadly strange that they are predominantly U-boat threads in the SH4 area.

Could a conspiracy theory eminate from this ?

Who knows?

I try to adhere to my RL training and instincts and keep an open but inquisitive mind.

A possible question that usually arises from the above is....Could there be an element of bias here in favour of SH4?

Possibly, especially when you consider that those moderating in the SH3 threads all play and spend far more time in the SH4 sections.

Now don't get me wrong, I am not calling any moderators honesty or integrity into question here, but I believe there is reasonable potential for a certain element of doubt when you consider that one of your good selves is a moderator on a certain forum that is seriously anti U-boat.

A forum that has numerous posts that are objectionable and subjective and go so far in places to call Neals honesty and integrity into question.

Never have I witnessed said moderator exercise their authority over there with such speed and zeal in closing down a thread or dampening a brush fire as quickly as I have witnessed on SS.

It would appear that members of said forum can post whatever venomous trash they like with total impunity to any consequences. It's usually accompanied with encouragement and additional ridicule from others.

In fact if I'm going to be challenged shortly after posting I think it also appropriate that I point out that I and others have actually read the odd negative post against SH3 by said inividual.

A question of credibility arises here and does little more than add weight to the concerns of those currently working on GWX4.

What is desperately needed is a moderator that enjoys the confidence and trust of so many instead of the current situation, which IMHO is not tenable.

(Please observe no reference or detail attached from any of our PM's)

Mr Robbins........You come across as so plausible, affable and conciliatory in your posts here.

Think again before continuing with the hypocricy.

What gives you the right to be so dishonest to so many on SS.

I find your attitude an afront to everyones intelligence on SS.

What you post here and what you post on another couple of forums are distinctly different.

Your comments 'from the peanut gallery' are often sadly, a source of entertainment to many.

I especially liked the one when you were boasting how you had fooled everyone into searching for a link which you deliberately pointed to another site where you are actively involved in encouraging people to leave SS.

You can wriggle whichever way you want.....but be the decent human being I'm sure you are, and don't insult the intelligence of myself and so many others here.

I'm deeply saddened at some of the detail I've posted here, mainly because I hoped it wouldn't be necessary to go down this route.

The point I'm trying to make is.....we will never come to a satisfactory conclusion that is acceptable to all if we aren't prepared to be open, honest and transparent with each other from the outset.

SS and it's community is far more important than all the people from either side of this sad divide.

REMEMBER!!......NONE OF US ARE AS CLEVER AS ALL OF US!!

Jim,

We are not here to for character assassinations or pointing out what you believe to be a short fall in someones idea of a good post. We are here attempting to solve a problem and make all happy to be here posting. Please be a voice in answering to the problem and not a continuation of it. Penelope and bigboywooly are helping in creating the answer for all. Follow suit if you will. To be honest, Neal is at his wits end and other life changing things are happening to Neal at present. Let resolve this, move on and allow Neal to sort his future. Neal and moderators are looking of answers to satify all.

Your suggestions and recommendations to further bolster friendship and developing he game are needed here.

I am well versed on Neals current personal position and I wish him all the the good fortune in the world. But this is not the issue here.

What saddens me is this is precisely the sort of dismissive response I anticipated.

What I do and my other dealings are not on trial here. I'm sure I have been discussed at the 'lair' more than once. Going down this 'route' you're hoping you do not have to looks to be more destructive then constructive. This is why a dismissive response. Perhaps listening to Penelope and her concerns/ideas and developing them for a common ground might be the best route at this time.


That's the second time you've referred to Penelope in your response to me.

FYI, what makes you think Penelope is stating anyone other than her own opinion or that Penelope is representative of the feelings of those from GWX who have already responded on this thread ? :hmm:

Mush Martin 07-04-08 04:11 PM

A few reflections, I dont think which theatre of war your modding
plays into any of the contentiousness.

the issue at least for me and hopefully a few others goes further
than the subject of SHIII V SHIV Mod forums.

to me the issue is behaviour in the SS community at large.
I agree with the principles expressed by JC that dialogue and
listening are the correct path. I also agree that a more rigid
enforecement is called for by the admins.

I disagree with PG that there are no shIII instigators, they have
offended me, I would point out that while here on the shiv forums
barring a misunderstood statement in the first two days of my presence
here I have never had a problem on the shiv mods like I often did
on the shIII forum.

the issue is really simply manners and adherence to polite protocols.

Manners are the Oil in the Gears of society
they reduce the friction created when humans interact
that is the actual purpose of manners, you dont need to like anyone
you just need be polite. People that slander or criticize a proposal
of manners of conduct simply throw sand into the machine of society,
in this case SS, and that is a counter productive buisness in any intrepretation. Like PG I hesitate every time I boot up subsim lately
and brace myself to find it in complete ruin. I dont brace myself because
of anything Ive experienced on the shiv forums.

M

skwasjer 07-04-08 04:36 PM

As author of S3D I have a different view on the modding community as pretty much 99% of you. In reality I don't mod at all, I've made one small PPF-mod (hardly special), and recently provided a solution to the propeller spin problem, as RR already stated. Other than that, I limit my time to work on S3D and help out other members when they have questions regarding the game files.

As a result, I don't often sit in the same seat as the 'modder' that has come up with a new mod, new feature, new idea, or for simply finding a fix to a long standing nuisance. It was very disappointing to hear that a solution was already known, while a fix was asked for many times (note: by others, never by me) in the past. Ironically, the guys that told me this also posted in another older thread where others and me were also discussing the problem. Note: no solution was brought forward! And as a result, no fix back then. No, I have to come up with a fix a couple of months later to hear it has been done before. Nice going! :nope:

To me, this is one of the root causes of the sometimes reoccuring drama show (we know, you don't) and I saw that coming very soon after a couple of replies. Nevertheless, I am happy I posted this information. I don't own this solution, the community does. No questions asked.

This has in fact happened before, and not just to me. I learned the hard way over the past year that many knowledge about the game IS available, but hardly anything was available in public. As a result I wasted countless hours in the first 6 months (and probably still do) to discover the game files by myself, only to learn afterwards people already knew about alot of stuff. Mind you, S3D has taken hundreds of hours, all by myself... I do this for ALL of the modding community (and not just around here). Let this thought sink for a while.

This is something I've said before, and I'll say it again, do withit whatever you want:

Senior modders in my book have an 'obligation' (for the lack of a better word, pardon me if it sounds to hard) to keep the community alive and most of all healthy. You could have saved me alot of trouble one year ago and others that start modding now. We all thank you for your past mods/work, but for everyone to enjoy modding, help people around. You may already do so, have done so, and continue to do so, which is great. But I often see seniors help others out in private (which isn't bad per se, as long as the knowledge finds the public one way or the other) or by doing the work for them, or the other way around by saying it's old news, or not say anything at all.

Wrong.

What this 'entire' community (both SH3/4) seriously lacks (even today) as opposed to other communities I've been part of is the 'desire' to share info. Yes, desire. People should be wanting to share that cool new find, through tutorials, walkthroughs, etc. You found a new trick? Cool, use it in your mod, and during or afterwards for all I care (if you are concerned about the 'praise') post a tutorial on how you achieved it. You get credit in two ways... And you've helped the common good.
Remember, you publish your mods for users, but you share your knowledge with co-modders. They are a different group. People forget about this way to often... Users enjoy your work, modders only want to know how you have done it. Whether you should do all this is your own choice, but in any case, I will and already do, as do many others, but it can be alot better if more do. Sure, it takes time to write something up, but don't forget it may have taken you dozens of hours to figure out, possibly even using free tools and/or already available knowledge. Why must others do this too? This is counterproductive.

Regarding 'unfinished' tools... S3D has been unfinished for over a year now, and was released as a v0.1 alpha which could basically only open the files and not much more. Uptil now, I have hardly had any user issues to resolve, so this is a non-issue to me. If you think you have a useful tool, but don't want or don't have time to improve it, why not just release it unfinished anyway (with or without source). Others may pick it up and improve it. That's what a community does...

The last couple of paragraphs are in the spirit of an opensource and collaborative community, and I happily do my part in it. If it wasn't like this or if this was to change, I'll be gone faster than you can say 'S3D'. My interests is to enjoy the game and it's technology, and a cooperative MOD-community, not to waste time on a community that fights and keeps everything to themselfs. That's why I am still here. We are still going in the right direction... :up:

I concluse this lengthy post with the following fact:

S3D helped more people to understand the game (including new modders, senior modders, GWX members, SH3 members, SH4 members), and allowed more people to join the modding world, be more creative with the game, and produced dozens if not hundreds small and big mods on either side of the pond, and it will continue to do so, no matter what preference of theater.

Speaking of which, stay tuned for the best S3D-update to date coming to you REAL soon... And damn it, because of this long post, it delayed the release! That's all I wanted to add... :smug:

AVGWarhawk 07-04-08 05:24 PM

Jimbuna,

Quote:

That's the second time you've referred to Penelope in your response to me.

FYI, what makes you think Penelope is stating anyone other than her own opinion or that Penelope is representative of the feelings of those from GWX who have already responded on this thread ? :hmm:
I did not state anywhere in the thread that Penelope was the forward leading authority to voice her opinion that encompasses everyones thoughts in the GWX camp. I stated Penelope and bigboywooly are providing some answers to a change here for the better concerning both theaters. Feel free to find a where I have done so and I will stand corrected. Thus far, these two have stepped forward, agreed that SH4 uboats should have their own forum, not only for the modders that have the interest soley in the uboats but for all members that are intriged by the uboats. It is just simple and organized. Each fan has their corner to create and learn. Once done, a new moderator to handle that forum. We ask that if the fence is jumped, it is to investigate, help and bolster the other theater when help is needed, a idea is new, exchange of information. This goes for both forums.

TDK1044 07-04-08 05:26 PM

I wonder if a 'chat room' might be a good idea when 'difficult issues' arise. :hmm:

What if a Moderator could set up a chat room, and invite designated guests for a specific day and time, so that those directly involved in an issue could discuss them honestly and frankly in a private environment?

Authority to enter the room would be controlled Neal, or a Moderator or Moderators designated by him.

The idea here is not to alienate the majority of the members, but to allow a communication channel not currently available in order to help resove a tricky issue.

MONOLITH 07-04-08 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly
I have yet to see an act of oneupmanship in respect of mods

Quote:

Originally Posted by danlisa
Then people attack Anvart, partly due to a miscommunication due to the language barrier, Privateer defends Anvart, then Ducimus posts snide comments, KL reacts, then you post at Anvart, thread locked.

So you have just demonstrated how Ducimus managed to derail yet another perfectly sound thread.



Please do not interpret this as an attack, but merely an honest attempt to discuss a fact;

We have a claim from a GWX member "I've never seen oneupmanship attempt",

Then we have you leaving out the real first post that caused the problem. You conveniently left out jimbuna, who was the first to jump in quickly rub anvarts post in skwasjer's face with a "GWX did it first post'...seen here..

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...3&postcount=23


Now, since it was clear Anvart's post was going to be an antagonist, what purpose did it serve for jimbuna to jump in and push it and promote a GWX oneupmanship in skwasjer's thread?

None, other than to demonstrate the very problem we're all here talking about.

And as for Ducimus and Lehmann, let's compare their words in that thread...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus
Who would have thought modding was such a political activity. :roll:

Over the years, i have come to realize that In general, while degrees of motivation vary, there are two basic types of modders: One, mods primarily for the betterment of the game; the other primarily for personal "glory", and the two often rub against one another. Just food for thought.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lehmann
Oh grow up. Given your posting history you would be wise to keep your mouth shut.


Now honestly, which of those quotes is a bit more palatable, and which one of those quotes is childish trash that should be moderated.


This fight has never been about SH3 vs SH4. This has been about one group breaking every single forum ettiquette rule we could write, and being allowed to get away with it.

And, it's not going to change, because no one here at the top is willing to admit the truth. Friends turn a blind eye to other friends behaviors. One hand washes the other, etc etc.

And watch...watch how this post is reacted to. That will also demonstrate the problem here.

Penelope_Grey 07-04-08 06:56 PM

Quote:

And watch...watch how this post is reacted to. That will also demonstrate the problem here.
A very nice bait MONOLITH, Your post is not helping the situation. You even realise it with that final line! Yet hit the post button anyway. Also your quotes are very very selective too. Totally ignoring circumstances prior that led to said quotes.

Also, you make us to be the villain... you are not snow white either... Here is the prime example of what I have been talking about all along and your post proves it, just as you're ready to walk away somebody comes along turns you round and wallops you again. You are here placing all blame squarely on GWX's doorstep... its not happening sir... Its not fair, or justified.

You don't like the GWX team... we get it. That's fine... can't say it bothers me much at this moment because you have tried to stir up trouble in our ranks... you failed miserably but you still tried.

This "one group" don't need to be mystic to know who you mean. GWX... You see what you want to see. You don't like GWX so you stand against us and attempt to discredit the team... it is NOT all our fault, and I refuse point blank to be broadly accused of that by you given your past history against GWX.

ReallyDedPoet 07-04-08 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDK1044
The idea here is not to alienate the majority of the members, but to allow a communication channel not currently available in order to help resove a tricky issue.

Not sure if a chat room is needed, but it is an idea. But your point with regards to alienating members is a good one, they are the silent majority, I am curious how the casual member views this current discussion or for that matter, the reasons why this thread was created in the first place. These are the folks that keep this place going in the end.

Much talk about modding and such, but mods are not much good ( no disrespect intended ) if you don't have folks that use them and provide feedback, good and the not so good. Point being in the end we are all members here, yes some folks mod, some Moderate, others come to get a question answered and there are various reasons why other folks come here, but in the end we are all part of this place called SUBSIM, and it is one hell of a place.

Some more of my .02 .....


RDP

MONOLITH 07-04-08 07:05 PM

Actually, it wasn't GWX I was talking about with my last sentence.

Sorry Penelope, but not everything is about you and GWX.



As for the rest of your post, look again, I have simply pulled actual posts from a thread, to stand for themselves. I haven't 'set anything up' or mislead anything. As for missing posts that 'led up to'...the thread is there for all to see, the only post before jimbuna's is anvarts GWX rub.

So, exactly how do you defend jimbuna jumping in to start the 'oneupmanship'?

Instead of attacking me with the typical line of 'you have a history with GWX, you don't like us, it's sooo unfair', how about we actually look at the fact and try to figure it out?

You avoid it, because there really is no defense for that post. And it does demonstrate a frequent style of uneupmanship that occurs here. And who's being mystic...lol.. I quoted GWX posts.

My post was not an attack on you, or GWX. I'm simply saying lets' look at the posts.... but instead of doing that, you just attack. Maybe my last line should apply to you after all.

There's no baiting or flaming in my post..only an eagerness to actually review the facts. You either do, or you don't. If you don't, then why not? Isn't that what we're trying to do in this thread?

So, the question would still be....

Quote:

Originally Posted by MONOLITH
Now, since it was clear Anvart's post was going to be an antagonist, what purpose did it serve for jimbuna to jump in and push it and promote a GWX oneupmanship in skwasjer's thread?


skwasjer 07-04-08 07:11 PM

Calm down :smug:

Mikhayl 07-04-08 07:13 PM

Ok, fine, but again, picking posts here and there doesn't make things any better, everybody could pick posts of X or Y and say "see, I told you". It's like running in circle, nobody's going anywhere with that. So, what's next ?
edit, what are you doing there anyway Skwas', where that new release already ?! :rotfl:

Mush Martin 07-04-08 07:13 PM

/\
/\
/\ Like He said :nope: (Skwasjer that is)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.