Skybird |
12-15-20 07:12 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna
(Post 2713748)
I'm still hopeful of a deal but should that happen it will be a deal watered down by both sides imho.
|
But the "deal" on the table right now already does watering things down beyond recognising the exit in Brext anymore. Access to the common market is only to be had at the price the EU sets, and I can even understand that, its a membership privilige, and it is only to be had at the cost of becoming a member and following the clubhouse's rules. This was always clear - or was it not? To me it was. And the price is compliance with EU rules and regulations and demands reachign far beyond pure trade and bartering. And that is incompatible with "exiting" from these rules.
This simple, really simple contradiction is what makes the whole theatreshow so absurd. They are negotiating to create an illusion that gets away with giving the appearance of being a success in the meaning of what Brexit originally meant. But it doesn't.
If Brexit is meant to actually mean what the term implies, there can be no "deal" then. Any deal compromises Brexit's meaning.
Lets not have the illusion that the EU is a fair trading partner if trading with it on WTO terms. It knows the keyboard of playing the full spectrum of manipulating import and export quotas by formally correct but still hurting measures, and custom regimes. And as many countries in the third world can tell, it uses them, especially when it comes to protecting agricultural interests. And after the past years, there will be plenty of emotionally driven motivations to let the UK have it especially hard in any further relations, if no deal is acchieved. Especially a French desire this is, but not only.
|