![]() |
Quote:
Markus |
Quote:
That would make American cars extremely expensive as well, with even small cars costing six-figure sums. The 1950s are over. Yes, we know you want that time back, not just in terms of manufacturing, but the 50s are over and won't come back. |
Jaguar has stopped delivering to the US.
|
|
Jaguar Land Rover is currently in the midst of significant strategic adjustments amid a new wave of U.S. tariffs on imported vehicles. The British automaker announced a temporary shipment pause to the U.S.—a key export market—following President Trump’s imposition of a 25% tariff on foreign cars. The pause, lasting about a month, is part of JLR’s efforts to assess the impact of these tariffs and develop longer‐term plans to mitigate cost pressures on its luxury brands
reuters.com . Meanwhile, the broader U.K. automotive sector is already feeling the squeeze. Production numbers are at record lows, and communities such as Solihull—home to one of JLR’s largest plants employing over 9,000 people—are bracing for potential job losses and wider economic fallout theguardian.com . On another front, Tata Motors, which owns Jaguar Land Rover, is actively reshaping its strategy. Tata is planning to both import JLR electric vehicles under India’s new EV policy—with significantly lower import duties—and to manufacture JLR cars at a new $1 billion plant in Tamil Nadu. These moves are aimed at expanding Tata’s footprint in a rapidly growing EV market and reducing reliance on fully built imports m.economictimes.com . Together, these developments highlight a challenging environment for Jaguar Land Rover, as it navigates tariff pressures, declining production figures, and shifting global manufacturing strategies. |
Quote:
Maybe because we don't do any business with those countries. You can't tariff nothing, even if you could get past all the financial sanctions we currently impose on them. |
Quote:
That's okay too. The last thing we need is a Car with Tranny problems. :haha: |
Quote:
The US doesn't do business with Heard Island and McDonalds Islands either, but they are on the list nevertheless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Wanting the 50's back in the sense that Americans are manufacturing products. Getting a living wage. A home. Family. All that is heard today is the service industry that American is, people cannot afford homes. Joe at the Ford plant in 1965 could afford a home. Joe's job opportunities today consist of McDonalds, 7-11 or cutting grass. Not much going for Joe. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not true concerning better products. I will pay extra for a quality product. Just today I had to replace an appliance bulb again. I replaced it 2 weeks ago. It did not burn out. It shattered. Thankfully the box came with a second bulb. The bulbs were made in China. Hope it lasts more than 2 weeks. I'd rather pay additional money for bulb that lasts more than 2 weeks. |
The first light bulbs made had a lifespan of +100 years, so manufacturers made them of worse quality to earn more on their product. So this is not China faults like it is not of your neighbours that you fail to improve your economy, it is kinda childish thinking.
|
Don't know the exact word for this, ("international parallel manufacturing"?) anyway this means every country does and produces what it does and is able to do best, exchanging the best and mostly reasonably priced products with other counties involved. This kind of trade model has always lead to international wealth, also for poor people.
Using tarriffs has been tried before and always lead to more poverty, less spending power especially for the not-so-well-off, and lead to a decrease of personal life standards. And this internationally, and first and foremost for the country creating those tarriffs. This is not a temporary result which will end in a shiny economy. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.