SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   US Politics Thread 2021-24 (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=248184)

AVGWarhawk 03-21-25 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2949774)
And he ended up being beheaded in 1476 and his head displayed in Constantinople as a trophy. :Kaleun_Wink:

Now that is reality TV at its finest! :har:

Buddahaid 03-21-25 11:41 AM

The Trump administration is very close to being in contempt.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...436.47.0_4.pdf

"The Court, accordingly, ORDERS that:

1. By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a
person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation
of the state-secrets privilege;

2. By March 25, 2025, Defendants shall submit a declaration indicating whether or not
the Government is invoking the privilege;

3. By March 25, 2025, Defendants shall file a brief showing cause why they did not
violate the Court’s Temporary Restraining Orders by failing to return class members
removed from the United States on the two earliest planes that departed on March 15,
2025; and

4. Plaintiffs may file any response to such brief by March 31, 2025.

/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge
Date: March 20, 2025"

AVGWarhawk 03-21-25 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2949847)
The Trump administration is very close to being in contempt.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...436.47.0_4.pdf

"The Court, accordingly, ORDERS that:

1. By March 21, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Defendants shall submit a sworn declaration by a
person with direct involvement in the Cabinet-level discussions regarding invocation
of the state-secrets privilege;

2. By March 25, 2025, Defendants shall submit a declaration indicating whether or not
the Government is invoking the privilege;

3. By March 25, 2025, Defendants shall file a brief showing cause why they did not
violate the Court’s Temporary Restraining Orders by failing to return class members
removed from the United States on the two earliest planes that departed on March 15,
2025; and

4. Plaintiffs may file any response to such brief by March 31, 2025.

/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge
Date: March 20, 2025"

The timeline is nothing short of hilarious. The government never moves this fast with anything.

Buddahaid 03-21-25 11:53 AM

It's just the latest ruling after the administration has already stalled. It's not a joke.

AVGWarhawk 03-21-25 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2949853)
It's just the latest ruling after the administration has already stalled. It's not a joke.

It will be ignored.

Buddahaid 03-21-25 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2949855)
It will be ignored.

And there you agree with the lawlessness an unconstitutionality of this administration.

AVGWarhawk 03-21-25 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2949859)
And there you agree with the lawlessness an unconstitutionality of this administration.

My statement does not demonstrate I agree/disagree with the lawlessness. :up:

VipertheSniper 03-21-25 12:24 PM

to those who said no due process for trespassers under the Aliens Enemy Act and the position of the DOJ that these deportation cases are not up for review, the courts have the power to review for the determination if a subject falls under the act or not:

https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/95...4art5vladekpdf

the review is from 2007, but I'm pretty sure a law professor wouldn't link to this if it weren't still applicable today

Quote:

Originally Posted by August
Look up the term "Malicious Compliance".

Good on them, if it was. Bringing the stink right up to the surface.

Buddahaid 03-21-25 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2949860)
My statement does not demonstrate I agree/disagree with the lawlessness. :up:

Yeah, I meant that more as a question.:salute:

AVGWarhawk 03-21-25 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddahaid (Post 2949867)
Yeah, I meant that more as a question.:salute:

The administration does need to stop and let the judicial wing do their job. Problem is....the judicial wing drags on for months and months...it is planned that way. Nothing gets done. Do you see a pattern here? This is the reason for a rush of executive orders. Just do it and let the smoke clear before examining the ins and outs.

MaDef 03-21-25 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reece (Post 2949771)

Nowhere in that article could I find an example of any racist remarks (or any remarks) by Trump, It's all based on the feelings of the writer.

You can do better.

VipertheSniper 03-21-25 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2949873)
The administration does need to stop and let the judicial wing do their job. Problem is....the judicial wing drags on for months and months...it is planned that way. Nothing gets done. Do you see a pattern here? This is the reason for a rush of executive orders. Just do it and let the smoke clear before examining the ins and outs.

You really should look into how the DOJ is arguing their cases, inane argument after inane argument, holding up the courts. That they haven't been held in contempt yet, is really a testament to the judges seemingly unending patience.

vienna 03-21-25 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aktungbby (Post 2949568)
...yeah...like a Hoover vacuum! :O:

...well. Trump really does suck...




>O>

Catfish 03-21-25 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2949849)
The timeline is nothing short of hilarious. The government never moves this fast with anything.

They try to catch up with Trump intentionally flooding the courts so they can't do their job properly. Tactics.

Cybermat47 03-21-25 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2949830)
What bloody idiot determined this was DEI? The medal was awarded in 1970. Whoever took it down should be fired.

My understanding is that the GOP’s leadership considers any recognition, promotion, hiring, etc. of someone from a minority group to be ‘DEI’. Unless they support the GOP, of course.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.