Will it be more difficult for escots to see at night?,will cargo ships lose thier spot lights,and maybe just shoot flares?:yep:

Bravo--back on track with the title of the thread "GWX News":up: :up:


Ps: Potoroo-please don't respond in this thread anymore--be the elder proffessional you claim to be and adrress it private or start your own thread.

Well GWX--anymore news??

Sometimes you'll find yourself in an argument with someone on a forum, thats rather unique.

Unique in that the other person in the argument will not stop until they've proven right (at least in his or her mind). Sometimes still they'll take it further to make sure everyone knows it in a sort of "HA ha see?! I told you so!" type of thing. My tin foil hat theory is that people arguing like this, its like some need to establish dominance in some percieved pecking order, or a bid to gain some sort of perceived respect or acknowledgement of some sort of percived superiority to distinguish themselves.

Other people will continue to argue, and will not stop, ever, until they get the last word in. period. Getting the last word in, is like some sort of proxy victory of an arugment.

Sit back and just watch sometime, its like a study in human behavior.

No, I think it's just attention seeking and as for this "professional" thing .. I'm a professional toilet cleaner so what does that mean ?!

First let me state that i am NOT a GWX dev. Well, not currently at least, i worked on it a little bit about a month or two ago before RL drew me away. Secondly i know some things about it, but i cannot dilvuge what (little) i know, or at least, im not sure what i can or cannot say about GWX.

I am confident however in saying that the state of the sea will make a large impact in visibilty, (and sensors too i beleive). I also think at some point the Kpt announced they've fixed the visual sensor (your watchcrew) being a bit too good at night.

That means , after a hard day cleaning ur full of sh!t :rotfl:


OnTopic: Well...I cant wait for GWX to come out to try it out and see if it helps me further enjoying the battles at sea.
still In GW I,m still surprised. Light Cruisers / Cariers appearing in large convoys wow...never expected that to happen really.

:rotfl:

... and Potoroo is typing up yet another craptacular post.

And to think I've been accused of displaying contempt.

Acutally i think it did to some degree. I remembe reading somewhere, early war, the british tried to imbed a warship of some sort as an inner defense for the convoys against surfaced uboats.

Carriers i know DID happen. If they werent attached the the convoy directly, they were part of a group that followed the convoy. This sort of helped fill the mid atlantic airgap and was a serioues blow to uboats, denying the use of wolfpack tactics.

Trolls (like you) earn my contempt as you have.

I see, thx for the feedback on that one because I was scratching my head when I heard their sound through the Hydrophone..''Could it really be?'' and when I popped up the scope I saw it.

I have so far detected : 1 X Dido Light Cruiser, 3x Southampton Cruisers and 1x Carier. its also a challenge for me. the Cruiser/Carier is the 1st one to be shot at :rock: really love getting my way into the convoy just to shoot that big target:up:

If you hadn't misinformed us in the first place there would never have been an argument. I find your subsequent displays of bile almost amusing.

I disagrie. When I get a contact at night I turn my binoculars to the baring noted and I can just make out the shadow(ship) :hmm:

Kpt.'s misinformation is not the cause of the alleged argument. It is your contempt for him and your insatiable need to be proven correct that leads to uncivil words being thrown about. Being correct does not give you carte blanche to express your correctness. Being superior and having contempt is no way to earn the respect of those who you are obviously putting this display on for.

Oh, for heaven's sake. There's nothing the least "alleged" about the argument. It's a fact and his misinformation was precisely the cause of it. An accurate description of the way the installer functioned would have lead to an immediate collective sigh of relief and we'd all have moved on.
Pointing out that someone has made or is making an error is not contempt. Persisting in the face of intransigence and abuse is not contempt. Refusing to allow oneself to be bullied is not contempt.

The contempt has been thrown my way, not the other way around.

I didn't persist out of some "insatiable need to be proven correct". I persisted because what we were told about the installer meant it was going to cause problems and those problems were avoidable.

This is pointless. Ducimus was right.

I was referring to GWX.

edit: Good greif, i hate my new avatar.

Oh, I'd be happy to move on but some things are just so ridiculous they need to be refuted.