In the news some hours ago the journalist asked this expert on Russia, if it could be a false flag operation-He, the expert, could not rule this out.

I say it isn't a false flag operation-If it had been before the war started, then I would have said yes.

They do not need some excuse to send hundreds of missiles against Ukraine-They are at war.(And 90 % of them get shot down)

However an attack on the heart of Russia could mean that someone has crossed the red line.

I also say the same as Jim-Sad they missed their target(s)

Markus

What a pathetic little puff in the air the explosion was. Attacking the Kremlin - with a tiny toy-thing like that...? And what nice viewing angle the shooting cameras had, and they where active just at the right time, in the middle of the night. Maybe some Romeo showing his Julia what a nice new smart phone he got himself?

It all stinks to heaven. False Flag, I say, to make Russians rally around Putin's flag or preparing them for Kremlin escalations to come.

It is being reported that Putrid was not in the Kremlin at the time but in another residence outside Moscow.

Seeing from your point-of-view then it most likely could be a false flag.

So far I always had thought that Crimea was their red line you do not cross.

The question is do Russia need some excuse for escalate the war ?

What if they have created this false flag operation to blame a third country ?

Markus

We will probably only see an escalation if and when the Russian people start problems for Putrid.

They do blame Ukraine.


The escalation could be against Russia: a new draft - or declaring martial law.

It does not matter whether it was a russian false flag op or a "real" attack.
Go on, apply pressure :03:

Russians will love to be mustered for a war that is no war but a "special operation". One step closer to revolution.

US Embassy in Ukraine warns of heightened threat of missile attacks

The US Embassy in Ukraine warned Wednesday of “an ongoing heightened threat of missile attacks,” including in Kyiv.

“In light of the recent uptick in strikes across Ukraine and inflammatory rhetoric from Moscow, the Department of State cautions U.S. citizens of an ongoing heightened threat of missile attacks, including in Kyiv and Kyiv Oblast,” the embassy said in a security alert.

In the alert, the embassy urged Americans “to observe air alarms, shelter appropriately, follow guidance from local authorities,” and take actions like immediately seeking shelter inside or going to the lowest level of their buildings “with the fewest exterior walls, windows, and openings; close any doors and sit near an interior wall, away from any windows or openings.”

“If you hear a loud explosion or if sirens are activated, immediately seek cover,” it advised. “Be aware that even if the incoming missile or drone is intercepted, falling debris represents a significant risk,” the alert said. “After the attack, stay away from any debris.”

The US government has repeatedly warned Americans to leave Ukraine and not to travel there amid the ongoing war with Russia.,, https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-...-23/index.html

https://ua.usembassy.gov/security-al...d-kyiv-oblast/

Ingenious :)

As mentioned before. Russia will blame some third country for being behind the attack on Kremlin.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-kremlin-putin

Markus

There are some fighter pilot who would gladly defend Ukraine in the F-15 or F16.

https://twitter.com/InfoAgeStrategy/...552896/photo/1

Markus

It really stinks to the high heavens, while i have nothing against Ukraine retaliating (after all it was Russia that sent and still sends missiles to Kyyiv and even had a special corps sent to kill President Zelensky, so how can Russia protest?? :haha: ), i doubt it was a "third country".

I am quite sure it was done by Russia to be able to escalate once more, and have a cheap justification.
Like Skybird wrote, escalating from draft to martial law, to sending more missiles at Kyyiv, to threaten the US with retaliation (the NERVE).

Another possibility would be intern russian sabotage trying to undermine Putin's position. After all whatever you make of it this was not a sign of strength.
From being able to get a drone there, to the hasty explanation "it was done by a foreign state". How does strongman Putin think he is able to "protect Russia" with this happening.