Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus
(Post 2121978)
I do agree.
I think as a party it is having a major identity crises. There's many more ideological divisions within the Republican party then the Democrats
|
Definitely, and in fact I think that both parties are having some deep identity crisis's, and both sides are drifting away from the center and off to their respective sides of the spectrum. In the Republicans there are more people reluctant to go in that direction than in the Democrats, and that has caused these divisions, with accusations and counter-accusations. I think that the Democratic unity is probably aided by the fact that they have a man in office, I suspect that if Obama wasn't president the Democrats would also be going through a self-validation cycle, a bit like our Labour party which is floundering around for ideas at the moment and trying to get back to its far-left roots, and making a real mess of it.
Quote:
It's not going to happen overnight, but the way things are going, unless things change drastically, I think it will happen. Maybe not within my lifetime, but most certainly within the lifetime of my unborn child's. Especially if the only counter to the Democrats is fragmented, stumbles into political traps, and is unable to garner enough votes as a result.
|
I can't rule it out as impossible, certainly it could happen, just as the Nazis took over Germany, anything is possible if done slowly and carefully enough. I suspect that there would need to be a great deal of social, political and economic upheaval to permit something like this to happen, a major war or attack on America perhaps, like World War One and the subsequent financial collapse lead the pathway to the Nazi party.
I would caution though, against falling into a ideological trap that states that it would be a Democratic leadership that would do such a thing, honestly either side would take an opportunity to gain more power, it's got nothing to do with ideology, nothing to do with politics, but simple human greed, and that spans
any ideology.
Quote:
What's more, currently the notion of "compromise" is right out. It's obviously out with the two parties, and its seen as a sign of weakness from their supporters. Personally, while I am not a big fan of the GOP, i am so throughly disgusted with the Democrats that I cannot force myself to listen to anything they have to say anymore. Watching Fienstien, Reid, or Obama speak? I can't do it. Watching any Democrat talking head only makes me angry. So i guess compromise is lost on me as well.
|
There's a lot of anger in America, I must admit, the sheer emotion of the American society, often represented in anger and harsh rhetoric, un-nerves me, and I ponder if it hasn't lead to the impasse with emotions overwhelming and overriding rational thought. I don't know, I just see a lot of people opening their mouths first and then engaging their brains, and that is a worry.
Quote:
True. It has never been lost on me that a lot of the BS we have today was started by Bush.
|
Indeed, certainly when you look at the debt, you see a plateau around the Clinton era...but then 9/11 happens and blam, off it goes.
Over here in Britain we have a term which originated in a political TV drama called 'The Thick of It', one of the more memorable characters in which is played by the same chap who will be the new Doctor Who. In it, he describes a situation as an 'omnishambles' which has made it into the Oxford dictionary with the following definition:
Quote:
a situation that has been comprehensively mismanaged, characterized by a string of blunders and miscalculations:
anyone with five minutes to spare, a Maths GCSE, and a calculator could have averted the entire omnishambles by checking the civil servants' sums
|
The current situation in the United States IS an Omnishambles, and it's been caused by both sides, and it has been in the making for
well over a decade.