Tribesman never commits to a stance on any subject. :03:

For the first part, I disagree. Tribesman presents no evidence or data to the contrary of any argument, which is why he has to rely on vague quoting and poor grammar to obscure the content. As for the second and third parts, absolutely. His posts are all disdain and vitriol.

I would also like to see this. You and I have both called him out on this before, and have gotten nowhere. I suspect that all he really wants is for us to be talking to and about him. He craves that sort of attention, not unlike yubba, who he, with no small amount of irony, rails against.

"According to TV station WABC, the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act, which bans magazines that carry more than seven rounds, does not provide an exemption for law enforcement officers, who typically carry handguns with a 15-round capacity"

Police trying to have this law changed.....Just goes to show when they start passing dumb laws how they don't pay attention.

Try remembering.


Disagree all you like, though you might be hard pushed to explain how bringing up simple bail conditions and conditions of release doesn't counter Augusts moan about some individual alledged criminals having their right to guns temporarily removed.
Then again recently you did have difficulty in understanding how all I had to do to show that one set of numbers didn't display the manipulation of another set of numbers was point out that they were in fact two different sets of numbers.:yep:
See how easy it is to present data that is contrary to the arguement.

Would you like the USC on bail conditions or would you like a state level breakdown?
How about some backround on further amendments because US citizens moaning to their government to impose tighter bail conditions because alledged criminals were re offending while on bail?

Or Perhaps would you like to see again that 2012 is not 2011?:03:

I rail against yubba for his conspiracy theories and extreme yet naive political partisanship.

All the stances are highly conditional, that is why terms and conditions always apply.

Ask a simple question, get an evasion. What else is new?

What data? Am I to take your word for it? Would you like me to get into what exactly your word is worth around here?

Right now, anything would be better than what you are giving us, which is nothing. Well, not nothing, I'm getting a lot of rude remarks and emoticons, which may impress yubba but you have been around long enough to know that it won't fly with me. So, again, where are your facts?

Right, you have none.

I think you rail against yubba because level water always finds itself. Don't like the comparison? You are in charge of you. It's what I always had to tell kids when I was teaching elementary school. It is also what I frequently have to tell you. Interesting, that.

Teflon comes to mind. :haha:

Of all the people on this forum and of all the trolls, bots and other assorted idiots that have passed through here, Tribesman is the only one that I use the ignore feature on.

It's because he literally has nothing worth reading. Ever. You never seen him wish someone a happy birthday or express his condolences at someones loss or post anything that is not just another iteration of his own special brand of sardonic hate speech that adds nothing to the conversation except vitriol. I'll pass on that.

:sign_yeah:

The best solution to gun crime is easy. Finding it is not.

Isn't it amazing how that troll can spew such obvious lies.
I suppose that is the price of ignorance for August.:rotfl2:

You are expected to read and to digest what is written, if you fail to do do so then it is you who is at fault and you should not be complaining because you have not understood.


Facts?
Lets see. Take a post you complained about.
1 It is totally misleading.
2 Not outlawed then.
3 Specify the legislation of whim or stand exposed in your bull.
4 Wow, if you are released on bail they can set bail conditions relative to the charges and the individual, whoda thunkit eh?
5 Steve already tried to defend that line of bull last time you spouted it. He came up with the amazing total of one single person in Florida calling for such a thing.

Show one line that is not factual.
Or considering the claim you made about it show one line which does not counter the line it was responding to.
3 of course is slightly different as that is a question for someone to provide the legislation of "whim" they say covers firearms.
5 is a rather good example, as that was someone else providing the data but not reading it and also not managing to notice the difference in what he was claiming and what I and his data was saying.
It also provides an example of August again parroting something which has already been shown as false.

Ask a simple question get a simple answer.
Can you remember my position on the registration of firearms?
How about the eliminating of loopholes on backround checks for firearms sales?
Can you remember why I think the NRA proposed "list of mentals" is a useless database to work with?

Feeling bad over the Mali topic eddie?
if you had decided to get even a little basic information on the recent history of the place you would have avoided all the "why US" claims you made.