SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   U.S. Navy to Probe Lewd Videos Shown to Carrier Crew (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=178676)

goldorak 01-05-11 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaddogK (Post 1567236)
He WAS a a junior officer 4 years ago when the videos were made AND they weren't a big issue back then because he WAS promoted to Captain. The issue today is WHY is it an issue NOW ?? Why is he being tried by the court of public opinion instead kept 'in house' ?

Yes, this screams of a DADT witch hunt.
The admirality is sacrificing this officer to cover their asses for promoting him.
:down:
Epic Fail for the Navy.

The Navy is quickly becoming a girl scout troup, NOT the brotherhood that I was once proud to be a member of.

You're playing with semantics.
Being XO, that is second in command of a 5000 crew warship is a pretty high up position don't you think ? Now if he were in charge I don't know, of the cleaning of the toilets then maybe you'd have a point. As it is you don't.
I talked about rank or position of authority, you can't get a higher position of authority than being the executive officer abord an aircraft carrier (except for the captain of course).

MaddogK 01-05-11 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 1567240)
I don't know; judging from the photos you posted, it looks like the Navy has a proud tradition of dressing and acting like a girl scout troop. :O:

Those were taken before peeps admitted that they were gay, and most were before women were allowed to serve alongside men on front line combat ships. Yes, we fantasized about women because sometimes it was months between actually seeing any, so it was a bit of a release. Sometimes you have to do weird things to keep your sanity when deployed, especially when the stress levels are high 24 hours a day for weeks at a time.

MaddogK 01-05-11 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldorak (Post 1567246)
You're playing with semantics.
Being XO, that is second in command of a 5000 crew warship is a pretty high up position don't you think ? Now if he were in charge I don't know, of the cleaning of the toilets then maybe you'd have a point. As it is you don't.
I talked about rank or position of authority, you can't get a higher position of authority than being the executive officer abord an aircraft carrier (except for the captain of course).

Why is the toilet scene bothersome to you ?

Have you ever seen Caddyshack ? Remember the swimming pool scene ?

Takeda Shingen 01-05-11 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaddogK (Post 1567250)
Those were taken before peeps admitted that they were gay, and most were before women were allowed to serve alongside men on front line combat ships. Yes, we fantasized about women because sometimes it was months between actually seeing any, so it was a bit of a release. Sometimes you have to do weird things to keep your sanity when deployed, especially when the stress levels are high 24 hours a day for weeks at a time.

Absolutely, you are right. It is all sociology. In a prolonged same-sex environment, even heterosexuals are known to temporarily take on a more homosexual role. You see it a lot in closed micro-societies, such as prisons. I imagine that many of the same principles would apply to an extended tour at sea.

goldorak 01-05-11 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaddogK (Post 1567251)
Why is the toilet scene bothersome to you ?

Have you ever seen Caddyshack ? Remember the swimming pool scene ?

You misunderstood me. I was not refering to the actual contents of the video when talking about "cleaning toilets".
I wanted to highlight the fact that being XO is a much higher position of authority, in fact second only to the captain of the vessel, than someone having to take charge of the kitchens for instance. Can we at least agree on this ?

MaddogK 01-05-11 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goldorak (Post 1567258)
You misunderstood me. I was not refering to the actual contents of the video when talking about "cleaning toilets".
I wanted to highlight the fact that being XO is a much higher position of authority, in fact second only to the captain of the vessel, than someone having to take charge of the kitchens for instance. Can we at least agree on this ?

Yes, we agree that the XO is high position of authority. I missing the reason why it was bad for the XO to try to maintain the crews morale by making a couple of videos depicting the same behavior that some of the low ranking enlisted crewmen undoubtedly portray in the crews berths while off duty.

I would know when to take the XO's (or Capt's) words seriously, why do you think the crew onboard wouldn't ? I used to party with a few officers in our squadron when we were in port (Yes, I was enlisted), and I think I gained some respect for them because I could see that they weren't much different than me other than their rank, and when time came to go back to work I didn't let our off-time influence me, and they also acted professionally. Those videos were made to entertain the crew while they were off duty. I have no doubt that Capt. Honors is a completely different person while on-duty.

Cohaagen 01-05-11 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Growler (Post 1565723)
What else is there to say but, sadly, political correctness trumps "tradition" in today's political and military climate. Look at the hubbub over the alleged USMC puppy video, and other footage out of the wars today. Did the American public think these guys just make this stuff up nowadays? etc etc

Yeah, damn those spoon-fed drones for being upset at a video of some white trash US Marine clearly throwing a puppy off a cliff. Political correctness is so crazy nowadays you can't even torture or kill small pets without some limp-wrist civilian complaining about it. I mean, don't they know about the golden thread of puppy-killing that runs through the Corps' history? Yes, clearly "tradition" trumped by political correctness yet again.

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/4346...oit_puppy.html

TLAM Strike 01-05-11 02:37 PM

"We train young men to drop fire on people. But their commanders won't allow them to write "****" on their airplanes because it's obscene!"

-Col. Walter E. Kurts

That nutcase was right... :hmmm:

... why is it always the insane who make the most sense... :06:

Molon Labe 01-05-11 03:46 PM

Ready, Aim, Retire: 7 Top Officers’ Epic Implosions


Quote:

In the new issue of Proceedings, retired Capt. Kevin Eyer writes about the rise of a post-Cold War "zero-defects mentality" that strips officers of their commands for infractions unrelated to the accomplishment of their missions. He's talking specifically about the Navy — which is more strict than other services about relieving officers — but that doesn't mean officers from the Army, Marines or Air Force are safe from the phenomenon. The important thing is not to sabotage yourself.
Lord knows lots of officers do. Here are seven of the stupidest, most boneheaded, most defeat-from-the-jaws-of-victory unforced errors that have cost officers their jobs. No one's immune, least of all journalists, to counterproductive behavior. But remember: If you're going to get fired, make sure it's because you're actually bad at your job.

(rest of article at the link. Hat tip to Neptunus Lex)

Tribesman 01-05-11 05:46 PM

Quote:

I don't know; judging from the photos you posted, it looks like the Navy has a proud tradition of dressing and acting like a girl scout troop.
Maybe someone should make a song about it, I am sure the Village People must be able to throw together a little ditty about the wonders of maritime service

Neptunus Rex 01-05-11 06:31 PM

Next we'll be hearing of officers being relieved for creating a hostile work environment that is inherently hostile (truly hostile, not "you hurt my feelings" hostile.)

Friggin mambe-pambe's!

Aramike 01-05-11 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neptunus Rex (Post 1567557)
Next we'll be hearing of officers being relieved for creating a hostile work environment that is inherently hostile (truly hostile, not "you hurt my feelings" hostile.)

Friggin mambe-pambe's!

Made me think of that Geico commerical with R. Lee Ermey in it ... I wonder his thoughts??? :cool:

Tribesman 01-05-11 08:46 PM

Quote:

Next we'll be hearing of officers being relieved for creating a hostile work environment that is inherently hostile (truly hostile, not "you hurt my feelings" hostile.)

Friggin mambe-pambe's!
If you look at that post of dismissals Molon put up you will notice one that was canned for creating an inherantly hostile work place.
Bad leadership skills apparently, a lot of it was only minor stuff of course, nasty words and making people feel small, even complaints about people making complaints through channels. Its funny if you look back to the topic that was here on this forum about that naval officer getting canned how many people expressed themselves in a rather differnet vein.

Gerald 01-06-11 04:36 AM

Officials: Probe Into Navy Videos to Include Higher-Ups
 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...de-higher-ups/

Note: Update record,Published January 06, 2011

Growler 01-06-11 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cohaagen (Post 1567357)
Yeah, damn those spoon-fed drones for being upset at a video of some white trash US Marine clearly throwing a puppy off a cliff. Political correctness is so crazy nowadays you can't even torture or kill small pets without some limp-wrist civilian complaining about it. I mean, don't they know about the golden thread of puppy-killing that runs through the Corps' history? Yes, clearly "tradition" trumped by political correctness yet again.

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/4346...oit_puppy.html

Right. So, instead, just to be safe, go ahead and treat everyone in uniform like they tossed a puppy. That way, we make sure we get all the puppy-throwers and don't miss any. Oh, and while we're at it, we'll make sure to call them all "baby-killers," too.

Meanwhile, to my point: The US military is clearly not exclusively angels in uniform, any more than devils in uniform. But you wouldn't know that from the attention the media gives the negative stuff, while completely ignoring the positive stuff. Tradition is referring to generations of military service members doing their jobs even in the presence of aberrant behavior in their ranks. Tradition being trumped is a daily ration of rum for men willing to fight for their country - but no, we can't have that - it's promoting alcoholism in the ranks!

And here's the result: The Highway of Death. Much of the Iraqi army escaped Kuwait in the '91 war, "Highway of Death" images notwithstanding. The Iraqi army that survived suppressed the Kurds after the Coalition pulled out.

And what did the press talk about after the war? "The Highway of Death" and the destruction of fleeing Iraqis there; fine, we'll just go ahead and let them go, then. They're nice people, they only looted and pillaged the people of Kuwait who deserved it.

The military exists to do the things civilians don't want to do. It's our job to KILL. It's our job to DESTROY. It's our job to be the exact opposite of what a civilized society accepts as necessary to operate. We have civil laws that provide strict punishment for stealing from or killing each other; we want soldiers to then do the things we told them were wrong all their lives. But the media will define the entire service by the actions of a few individuals caught on tape.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.