![]() |
Wow!
Anything to back this up with? Because that would be interesting to see. |
Quote:
The only problem there seems to be that the Foundation has never made any such claim and have gone on record to say it is a hoax story . Whodathunkit eh? Whats really funny is that much of this conspiracy drivel that some are touting here as "fact" originates from a hoax chain e-mail from April 1st. Its amazing that all these months later they don't realise it was fake. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for your Ted, Charlie, Jeffrey and John example: "Hussein" is no where near as common in this country as those names. How about a middle name of "Adolph"? or "Pol Pot" instead? Can you see the difference from behind those democrat covered glasses you wear? |
Quote:
Furthermore certanly they did not go out of their way to make sure no one uses their middle name. Its semantics of course but indicative of a bigger picture. |
Official functions, yes, everybody uses their middle name. Obama used Hussein at the inauguration.
But the initial accusation was that Obama had gotten the mainstream media to not use his middle name. My point was that in everyday news coverage, Presidents are almost never referred to with their middle name. Middle initials are somewhat common, or all three initials (FDR, JFK, LBJ), but I don't recall any who were routinely referred to with their middle name. I didn't even know Clinton's middle name until the impeachment stuff. And as I suspected, the claim that Obama is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep his birth certificate secret came from.... chain e-mails! I'll bet that the same is true for the new gem that he's an Indonesian citizen. Here's a tip - if you read something in a chain e-mail, IT'S NOT TRUE! |
Apparently the soldiers order have been revolked. :hmmm:
http://theliberaldemocrat.com/?p=2029 Quote:
|
Quote:
Whats a chain email? I dont know I dont get them I have a decent spam filter. The point I am making about Obama having his middle name suppressed during the race is simply that it was sucessfully suppressed. If a jornulaist or talk show host showed the bad taste of metioning his full name they would be chastised and threatened with 'legal' action. But when it came time to 'negotiate' with the middle east he was all proud of if. Again to me its not a big deal, as is his dubious citizenship, but put that with his past associations, action committies, church, relationships and on and on it starts to complete a puzzle. Simply stated Obama is not whom he portrays he is. He ran as a centrist conservative and is nothing of the sort. |
Who was threatened with legal action?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as Obama not being who he says he is, I agree with that statement, but for completely opposite reasons. I actually think he portrayed himself as a liberal, but he's more pragmatic than people think. He's not one of those bleeding heart, save the world types. But that's another argument for another time. |
Quote:
It's like saying that Obama prevented the media from saying he's left-handed. Yes the media didn't talk about it, but not because Obama told them not to. |
You know your not going to find links I'm just a wacko nut job that makes this crap up. Even though those guys talked about it on the air.
Ill look and see what I can find but yea sure I make all this up. :doh: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.