Sadly it looks like many psychos are into the ranks. :nope::nope::nope:

The difference between Fish's post and the police officer who tazed the student is that the officer in this incident is willing to speak with the Islamic community regarding the incident instead of making fun about it.

A psycho's characteristic is that enjoys the other people's suffering.

Exactly. :yep:

Is this thread still going? :doh:

I have read most of the post here and watched the video. It is plain and simple. Youth today have not respect for authority AT ALL!!!! He simply should have submitted and he would have been on his way. But no, the I will take you to court attitude and take every penny you have always prevails these days and all he was think was retiring early on the tax money from the UCLA campus. I'm sure the lawyers were outside his house the next day to start and formulate their case for millions of dollars in "pain and suffering ". Look at it for what it is ...a punk not cooperating at ALL. So ok, no pistol whipping or batons....use the taser to subdue and get his dead butt out of the building so the paying students who want to do something with their lives can keep studing without idiot boy making trouble. Now we did not see what happened prior to the tasing therefore we can only guess whatever he was up to was not good as three officers responded. Furthermore, perhaps he was on some whacked out drug and really not feeling anything at all. LSD is known to make people feel like Superman and do incredible things. Whatever the case, he got what he deserved. The police force are not here to be abused by every Tom, Dick or Harry when they feel like it.:nope:

Not that I want to get too deeply involved in this argument, but I can't help but notice that the quoted post is not misleading so much as blatantly wrong. Let's do the reading comprehension thing.

At the top of the list, we have 'Officers utilizing any pain compliance technique should consider the totality of the circumstance, including but not limited to:'. The case Capo's talking about, (g), reads 'If time permits (e.g. passive demonstrators) other reasonable alternatives. So the whole sentence is, for (g): Officers utilizing any pain compliance technique should consider the totality of the circumstance, including but not limited to (if time permits) other reasonable alternatives.'

So, actually UCLA isn't advocating taser use against passive demonstrators so much as saying that in the case of passive demonstrators, pain compliance techniques should not be used.

I would insert a remark about not misrepresenting facts, but the only one who seems to be doing that regularly is Von Capo, and other people have done the remarks already.