![]() |
Ha, now I found something. The German HuffPost wrote about a group of German economists and advisors that the EU should create a new customs union called European Customs Association wehre all would be members, inclduing the UK, and the UK remaining to vote in economic decisions affecting all Europe. The experts said that the Backstop positions of all sides are unnegotiable for the EU, for the UK and for the republic of Ireland, and thus it must be taken out of the equation by this bypasing attempt.
The logic of why to do so, is fine, the Backstop thing gives the eU a total and potentially unlimited negotiation superiority over the UK in the future, this is unacceptable for the UK. A hard border is unacceptable for Ireland. and the EU does not want to give up its super trump card for the future that May was so stupid to prematurely agree to. From the bots: Quote:
Note this is not the position of the German government, but private talking. Also note the eU must hate this proposal, since the eU declares social issues and economic freedoms to be a monolithic unity that shall not be broken up. And finally it is a proposal closer to the psotiions of Labour than the Tories, so the May camp must hate it while Corbynistas maybe want to celebrate, I don't knwo. My optimism doesnot start to grow, therefore. |
^ It's looking more and more that the UK will remain in the EU......unless Parliament can unite themselves.
|
Quote:
Get a beer out the fringe you are a star. :DL |
Sorry, did not hear of anything either.
If anything they said that there is no further concession possible without creating unfair trade relations and ridiculing the idea of the EU. |
Project fear reaches a all time new high, listening to the radio last night plans have been made to get the royal family out of the UK if the UK crashes out with no deal.
Sounds like some one called the....A-Team. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Moving on... I don't believe the media story about a possible general election in June. |
Correctamundo, a previously little known fact or one that wasn't previously made public....the new diesel emissions requirements were never going to be met.
|
Three days of talks have commenced.
Quote:
|
Mean while back in the Labour party....
Quote:
|
Quote:
A world of non-anti-semitic comedians! |
and it was nice to hear how the tone in Brussel turns rough and Ireland was openly threatened to to be exlcuded form the common market by enforcing a tax regime on it if they would not do heavy action on realising a solid border with Northern Ireland in an attempt to prevent new terror and civil war.
It is obvious by that that foer the EU leaving a state of its empire shift into war and terror is preferrable to the outlook of not punishing the stubborn Brits as heavily as possible and bitterly defending their grap on the Backstop deal they managed to get agreed to by stupid May. The damn EU should be a free trade zone only, and all demands and calls beyond that and all imperial effort to enforce foreign policies and social experiments and cultural reeducation and enforced migration and centralisng control of a de facto planned economy onto all members should be send to hell better yesterday than today. Free trade zone. This the EU should have been today - and not one bit more. To leave the Irish question to the end, was stupid by all involved sides, and naive. To agree to the Backstop solution was stupid by May. What Corbyn has to babble, is always adding new depth to the meaning of the word "stupid". |
OMFG do you have any evidence or at least a link to back up your defamatory statements?
Equal rights in Northern Ireland are threatend by brexit, not by the EU https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00339-y https://www.ft.com/content/1a7af4ec-...9-c7e6ceb5ffdf A threat by whom? Isn't it so that some Tories threatened Ireland with a food shortage in case of a backstop, and if it stayed in the EU? https://www.irishexaminer.com/breaki...es-890762.html The "backstop" was a british proposal, and the EU agreed to it as did Ireland. It is perfectly clear that there will be a hard border with no backstop, this was never in question. How else will England want to "protect its borders" in case of a no deal brexit? So it is so bad to say how it is aloud and call a spade a spade eh? This has all be ignored during and since the brexit refeferendum, don't try to blame all this bull on the EU again. |
Barnier says backstop is 'only operational solution' to Irish border issue
so what does that really mean? Brexit: Does the Irish peace accord rule out a hard border? :hmmm: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.