Back to the original topic:
At first I think I owe someone an apology for an honest mistake I made:

Dear Oberon,
I saw your gif being the first reply to the posted polemic. I scrolled down, regarded the picture with a smirk and didn't really consider the deeper warning behind it, even though I own my share of vinyl. I should have known better that this thread was not meant to discuss an opinion piece, but it's all about preaching the gospel. So I am truly sorry fornot giving your post the consideration it deserved!
Anteeksi! :salute:


@Sky:
Schätzeken, you are so predictable. I knew questioning the credentials of one of your saints would lead to accusations of character assassination. It's a common trait of fundamentalists to react this way. That's why I included the example about Hankel. Fyi: I don't agree with the guy either, but at least he's credible. My last words on Braunschweig is that he looks extremely dubious. No academic that I know of would hesistate for a second to tell where and how they acquired their title. The same shadyness is seen when a businessman doesn't mention a company he founded in his name. Yeah I found the mentioned forum when checking out Braunschweig. So if the 1 post contributers are right, good for them that their titles got accepted. To me, it still looks shady, but expectable: A market-liberal who has no problems taking advantage of a corrupt government and weak EU laws – both stuff he claims to despise - when it comes to dodging taxes or giving out titles. It's also pretty new to me, that books written for the large public shall not be held to any standards or scientific methodology, good to know! :up: So I still think Braunschweig is a hack and his (final) solutions to disband welfare and fight the poor are thoughts of a maniac.

Like I implied before: I'm not terribly interested in discussing your holy men, the fed, the money system, the French revolution nor listening to your preaching about your new found religion of "Libertarialism". I wanted to comment the article you posted and looked for your answers reagrding its content. So besides going on tangents, your answers so far have been: read this book, read that pamphlet and eventually a recommendation to read former posts of you. Sounds to me like: "Oh, I wrote about it before, go and read the ten commandments I set in stone back in 1679! Everything I wrote is true. Why? - because I say so.". Sorry, that's not how discussions work in the real world.

And lastly, the accusations about "Rufmord" are pretty rich, coming from a guy who posts and agrees with an article that calls a huge bunch of the populace bastards. :har: Well, hasn't been the first time you use the big brush to paint groups of the population in the color you like, certainly won't be the last.

:hmmm: Make that two honest mistakes. :03:

He really likes to do that. Using an arrogant smug tone to generalize entire populations. A trait of people with IQ measured in double digits.


I actually re-read the entire thread to find that Dowlys gif :haha:

:/\\!!:oops:
ehhm...., I mean: That's typical of you gay commie-muslims: rewriting history, when my post clearly states your name, even in bold letters! :O:


(Sorry Oberon)

Revision tiem!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...lai_Yezhov.jpg

:haha:

Tell that yourself, Mr. Righteousness. You raise dubiuos claims and remarks that imply that some person whose views you do not like and who you obviously know nothing real and serious about, has acted criminally or had been involved in criminal acts, you paint it as if that were a fact, you still owe me/us any source for your accusations until today, not to mention: evidence, you do not provide any background on where your information is coming from, and just reply by raising more such dubious claims. All the time you do not care for his arguments and work, thinking you get away but just giving the man a bad name by character-assassinating him, and again: you do not care to provide a single piece of evidence for your claims, you do that just to discredit the man so that you must not take the effort to counter his thoughts and arguments. I asked you three times to provide ypour informational basis, soucre, or evidence, and you provided Nothing. Nix. Rien. Nada.

Extremely underhanded, but matching the impression i got of you already longer time ago, since I see you doing like this not for the first time.

I think we are done with each other. I am allergic to people that are so underhanded, so in the future: leave me alone.

You monster, you purged all penguins from this photo! :o

Projection: a psychological defense mechanism where one person, in defense, denies negative qualities in himself and attributes same negative qualities in others.

Ahh, time for a cigarette. I love them because it pays taxes to dear leaders, also so my beloved state doesn't have to pay any pension for me. More for them!

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/upload...-Oh-Russia.gif

Did I hear someone going repeatedly off the track? Pfff, I couldn't give any flicks. I have Stalin in my mind and a cig in my hand.

This thread needs more Honecker, Ordnung muss sein!

https://andreariscassi.files.wordpre...8-honecker.jpg

Comedy post of the year

I'm calling it.


Edit - Betenov I didn't see yours, the contest begins! Well done sir!

Four Honecker clones in one thread - and I thought Merkel already were his late revenge against the FRG...

Well, as we say in German: gleich zu gleich gesellt sich gern...

Yup, card-carrying raving leftist, me.

Also opposed to systemic societal categorisation and generic fascism. That and blatant economic illiteracy.

If that makes me Honecker then I'm ready to pose for the official portrait.

Left side would be best, obviously

I remember that film:

Four Honeckers and a Fuhrer

Was released straight to DDR.

I am still struggling to understand how free market could work in today's world. :hmmm: