unbelievable:har:
So you went through 3 pages of links and didn't find any reference to any of the hearings court cases appeals apologies campaigns books films awards and honours?
That is some search engine you have:yep:

Well yes ... that was my whole point therefore generally speaking obtaining intelligence would be not reliable but worth try in some extreme cases.

The context of that comment was in relation to a circumstance that doesn't apply in a terrorist inyerrogation. Torture 's unreliability makes it invalid. Again why hurt someone if you don't have to, and can still end up with the same results?

Unless you like to hurt people... Then you're merely a sociopath.

Anyone else read
How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq


by Matthew Alexander (Author), John R. Bruning (Author), Mark Bowden (Foreword)

It is a most interesting book on interrogation techniques that work.

As long as torture is don't by good men......


http://i651.photobucket.com/albums/u...psb5b4b76c.jpg

Well, nobody would expect otherwise. :03:

http://shirtoid.com/wp-content/uploa...nquisition.jpg

Now -- you will stay in the Comfy Chair until lunch time, with only a cup of coffee at eleven.