Gentlemen, I don't want to interrupt your arguing too much. However I would also appreciate if you Tribesman would use "reply with quote" as it makes figuring out context easier. This is especially true when replying to Skybird's posts as they tend to be rather lengthy.

And the other allegations.

Yet another incorrect allegation, there is no intention as you describe.
You keep on going on about my intentions which you are making up yourself.

But Kraznyi that would not get your quote in this post, that would require another button again so I would have to hit multi quote multi quote then post reply

Either you're too stupid to figure it out, or you do it on purpose. There are no other choices, and it's obvious you're not stupid, especially since you did use it once. Your denial is hollow.

All you have to do to fix this is to use the 'Quote' button.

And other people do that all the time as well. Why can't you?

So Firefighters and firearm regulation.
2 questions
Should the young lady be charged with accessory to murder?
Would registration of firearms and regulation of all gun sales have prevented in any way her turning two of the murderers weapons over to a convicted felon?

I could have told you that a year ago. You have far more patience for his trolling than I do. :salute:

Tribesman, all anyone is asking you to do is use the quote button when replying like everyone else does. I don't know if it is an evasive thing or you just have to be a special snowflake, but it's really getting very silly.

I am afraid that is not the case Takeda, all some people are saying is that the use of the post reply button is done with some nefarious intention.

Not sure exactly what the NYS penal code says but normally unless she knew the guns were going to be used in a crime then no, she can't be. She can only be charged with violating firearms regulations by purchasing them for someone who couldn't legally own them.

No law can prevent someone from breaking the law. She lied when she purchased the .223 and shotgun from Gander Mt. breaking the law, and she broke the law again by giving them to a felon.

The simple solution is to simply not reply to his posts. :|\\

I've admitted I was wrong about that, and apologized.

All I'm asking now is that you use the 'Quote' button like everyone else.

Flood tubes one and two...

That does not answer the question.
Take Irish regulations for an example, if I was to illegally sell a legally held weapon of my own to a person who is not allowed to own firearms how soon could that crime be detected?

I will try and avoid using the post reply button when I post a reply, but don't be surprised if I read to the end of a topic and hit the button as it just means I read to the end of the topic and hit the button, no more and no less.

In theory never. Until those firearms are caught being used in a crime or you or someone else tells the authorities that you have broken the law no one would know. No regulation would prevent someone from breaking the regulation.

Read it again, then try again as the answer is "in theory rather quickly"

How? If you own a legal item and sell it illegally there is no record of the transfer and the only people who know of it are the buyer and the seller. Unless one of those two individuals demonstrates by action or statement that an illegal action has taken place law enforcement does not know a crime has been committed.

It's Schrodinger's Gun, until that weapon is used illegally an outside observer will not know the state of the weapon: the gun is both legal and illegal at the same time.