SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   SUBSIM wristwatch thread (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=179105)

Blood_splat 01-20-11 01:30 PM

You can always wear a clock around your neck.

http://www.brandish.tv/assets_c/2009...x538-74365.jpg

longam 01-20-11 05:21 PM

I'm with Steve, but I found a middle solution...

http://dc306.4shared.com/download/ytggkUHB/IMG_0181.JPG

Reece 01-20-11 06:25 PM

I don't know why Longam but it just doesn't have that appeal to me!!:hmmm:
@ Neal, obviously you really like that watch, it certainly is different to today's styles, I would go for it!!:yep:
Here is another in my collection (Germasian), an automatic, cost $85:
http://www.uhren-bilder.de/Trias/TRI...2337-S-4-k.jpg

Platapus 01-20-11 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens (Post 1577545)



Interesting how the Roman numeral 4 is represented by IIII instead of IV .... :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427 (Post 1577556)
somebody wasn't paying attention to their lessons in roman numerals...

Actually they were. IIII was how Romans wrote the number 4. It was only long after the fall of the empire that the subtractive concept was used for Roman numerals. IV for 4 and IX for 9. There are still examples of Roman educational scrolls and engravings that list IIII for 4 and VIIII for 9.

This is one reason doing math using Roman Numerals can be cumbersome, It gets easier (a little!) when you revert back to "real" Roman Numbers that use the additive schema.

Probably more than you ever wanted to know about Roman Numbers.

What should be more interesting is why do they put Roman Numbers upside down on watches/clocks but put Arabic numbers right side up?

Platapus 01-20-11 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1577824)
It means that battery gunk stickied the little movee bits all together and he has to put in all new movee bits so they'll move again.


Stop with the technical jargon so the rest of us can understand.

(sheesh, some people flaunting their "education")

:D

TarJak 01-21-11 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1578820)
Stop with the technical jargon so the rest of us can understand.

(sheesh, some people flaunting their "education")

:D

That's ejumakashun to you bub!:know::D

Onkel Neal 01-21-11 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 1578818)
Actually they were. IIII was how Romans wrote the number 4. It was only long after the fall of the empire that the subtractive concept was used for Roman numerals. IV for 4 and IX for 9. There are still examples of Roman educational scrolls and engravings that list IIII for 4 and VIIII for 9.

This is one reason doing math using Roman Numerals can be cumbersome, It gets easier (a little!) when you revert back to "real" Roman Numbers that use the additive schema.

Probably more than you ever wanted to know about Roman Numbers.

What should be more interesting is why do they put Roman Numbers upside down on watches/clocks but put Arabic numbers right side up?

Nice! I didn't know that. So this watch must be modeled on the split second between when the Roman numeral revisions had not converted the 4 and had converted the 9? Cool!


Quote:

Originally Posted by Reece (Post 1578797)
I don't know why Longam but it just doesn't have that appeal to me!!:hmmm:
@ Neal, obviously you really like that watch, it certainly is different to today's styles, I would go for it!!:yep:
Here is another in my collection (Germasian), an automatic, cost $85:
http://www.uhren-bilder.de/Trias/TRI...2337-S-4-k.jpg


Very clean! Nice, Reese.

Skybird 01-22-11 05:35 PM

Don't they say "you need to go with time"...?

http://www.geekalerts.com/u/ibiza-ride-watch.jpg

http://text2blogger.appspot.com/stat...inaryWatch.jpg

http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/...ovwatchled.jpg

No, think I need not.

Onkel Neal 01-22-11 06:41 PM

That last one is really tricky :)

August 01-22-11 07:02 PM

I kind of like this one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 1580050)


the_tyrant 01-22-11 07:18 PM

What do you guys think about luminox watches?
They look great, and on paper they seem to be tough
But the price tag for some of their better watches are quite expensive, some of them are almost as expensive as a rolex
What do you guys think? Are luminox watches worth the high price tag, or are they just over rated, and priced high because they seem "military"?

Onkel Neal 01-23-11 01:12 AM

I can't offer an opinion on any watch that costs for than $200 :)

kranz 01-23-11 05:20 AM

the rosato which I was talking about.
http://www.uhren4you.de/picture/rosato/R604-Kopie.jpg

THE_MASK 01-23-11 05:53 AM

Now this says statement\class
Longines
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/620...ioko8e0uep.jpg

Reece 01-23-11 07:24 AM

Most unusual Sober, is this one of yours?:hmmm:
@ Neal, who's Reese?;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.