![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. The targetting computers weren't that accurate back in the old days. 2. Phasers don't detonate - that takes a photon torpedo. 3. I saw it in the show, so there! 4. My BS mojo juju magic tech is both prettier and shinier than yours, so there again! |
Quote:
Quote:
They seem to be able to hit a specific building on a planet from orbit... seems accurate to me... Quote:
Quote:
:O::O::O: |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
One of my favorits Scifi chicks. is Natasha henstridge.. http://ecw.twentyeyes.com/wp-content...henstridge.jpg |
Quote:
The base rule for "hard" SF is to break as few laws of physics as possible, and follow the chain of "what-if" for those you do (based on how you explain them in the first place). FTL is gonna be a given for most SF, but the goal should be to break as little as possible. ST (particularly TNG) breaks new laws almost every episode. They use made-up technobabble as a plot device constantly (a sign of terrible writers), then more new "______-genic fields" constantly to fix the problem they set up weakly in the first place. ST got so bad that no given writer even had a clue that their plot was already solved by another weak writer's physics breaking invention. ST is no more "hard" than Star Wars, IMHO, and no more consistent. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Considering they are a particle weapon you can do funny things with them. |
Quote:
:O::O::O::O: Some mouth-breathing dweeb once tried to rope me into an argument about which movie Batman would win a fight. My answer? "Whichever one the screenwriters said would win!" |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.