Quote:
Originally Posted by Fincuan
(Post 1401988)
edit: For the record SH5 has the same five years of development behind it, just by developers that get paid for their work.
|
Yes, people keep forgetting this. The devs haven't lived on the moon for the last five years only to pop back a few months ago and start SH5 from scratch; they've "evolved" SH3 into SH4 and "evolved" SH4 into SH5.
In essence, modders have evolved SH3 into GWX, WAC, LSH etc; the devs have evolved SH3 into SH5. Comparisons between SH3/GWX today and SH5 today
are fair - the devs have had the
exact same amount of time that the modders have had to improve upon SH3, but they've had the
added benefit of the source code, learnings from modders, and payment as incentive.
I guess the fairer comparison is: "which one has evolved more over the last five years?" Well, in some ways I'd argue SH5 has
regressed (less boats, less years, less features, less ships, more bugs). Of course, its big selling point is the "OMG amazing immersive graphics", which I think only the most ardent SH5 hater would say are worse than SH3.
Now, while there's still new mods coming out for SH3, it's pretty much reached, IMHO, the pinnacle of its life, whereas SH5 is nowhere near it (or so I would hope). In a years' time if one still says that SH3/GWX (for example) is better than SH5, then we have some serious problems. SH3 was primarily
revolution, SH5 is primarily
evolution (with arguably a half-a*sed attempt at revolution); people should not forget the difference this makes to modding.