SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Did Letterman cross the line?

Page 6 of 6

« First

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Did Letterman cross the line? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=152635)

Aramike

06-14-09 08:08 PM

Quote:

Underage sex IS statutory rape.

Umm, no its not.

"Statutory rape" is subject to - anyone, ANYONE??? STATUTES!!! YAY, Tribesman ALMOST got it.

Statutes can be different depending upon the location.

However, two 14 year olds having consensual sex is NOT statutory rape in many places, although it IS underaged sex. Take one those 14 year olds and pair them with a 35 year old, and now it IS statutory rape.

Now to put it in words Tribesman can understand:

Blah blah, blah blah blah, blah, blah. Waa, waa, blah waa, blah. :yep:

But keep dancing, puppet. Your easier to control than a sports car with new tires.

PS: Please take off the spandex.

owner20071963

06-14-09 08:23 PM

If this so called TV Presenter was in Europe?
Including others I dear not mention?
He and others like him would be Jobless,
Sadly the more You watch TV on the sofa You will get what we call Obesity or Obese :yawn:

SUBMAN1

06-14-09 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDK1044 (Post 1116836)

Letterman made a joke that was not very funny and was in poor taste. This was made worse because it turned out that it was the younger Palin daughter at the game.

End of issue. :)

About sums it up right there.

-S

Tribesman

06-15-09 02:00 PM

Quote:

Umm, no its not.

Yes it is .

Quote:

Statutes can be different depending upon the location.

Indeed they can

Quote:

However, two 14 year olds having consensual sex is NOT statutory rape in many places, although it IS underaged sex.

:har::har::har::har::har::har:
It is not statutory rape if they are above the statutory age of majority.
So for your example .... in a jursisdiction where the age of majority is 13 then it wouldn't be statutory rape if they are 14, but as the legal age of majority determines that limit then isn't underage sex is it.

Try again , read the following very slowly , get help with the hard words....

Quote:

Statutory rape IS underage sex.

So since you have already demonstrated that you have difficulty reading , differentiating between rape and statutory rape, don't know what statutory means , don't know what underage means and don't even understand what a statute is....
I have to ask , what is the next demonstration of your lack of knowledge going to be?

CastleBravo

06-15-09 02:57 PM

If I or anyone else said the sme things about another Subsim Member's family would it go unchallenged?

Aramike

06-15-09 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 1117980)

Yes it is .

Indeed they can

:har::har::har::har::har::har:
It is not statutory rape if they are above the statutory age of majority.
So for your example .... in a jursisdiction where the age of majority is 13 then it wouldn't be statutory rape if they are 14, but as the legal age of majority determines that limit then isn't underage sex is it.

Try again , read the following very slowly , get help with the hard words....

So since you have already demonstrated that you have difficulty reading , differentiating between rape and statutory rape, don't know what statutory means , don't know what underage means and don't even understand what a statute is....
I have to ask , what is the next demonstration of your lack of knowledge going to be?

Nice try confusing the issue. My post above stands completely to this convoluted attempt at communicating.

There's a great tool called a dictionary that can define "underage" for you. Here, let me pull a Tribesman: :har::har::har::har::har::har:

Keep dancing, though. :yep:

atuhalpa

06-15-09 03:21 PM

Only idiots watch TV, and only stupid idiots watch network TV.

Aramike

06-15-09 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atuhalpa (Post 1118059)

Only idiots watch TV, and only stupid idiots watch network TV.

Interesting first post... :nope:

Tribesman

06-15-09 09:40 PM

Quote:

Nice try confusing the issue.

The only thing confused in this issue is you, that is because really simple things are quite beyond your grasp.

Quote:

My post above stands completely

Your post demonstrates that you havn't the faintest idea what you are talking about.

Quote:

There's a great tool called a dictionary that can define "underage" for you.

Indeed , there is a thing called a dictionary , it explains what words mean.
Underage is clearly defined
So perhaps you can find a dictionary , then find someone in your house who has a functioning brain and then they can explain to you in really simple words why you are completely clueless.

Onkel Neal

06-15-09 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike (Post 1118095)

Interesting first post... :nope:

Yeah, no kidding. :hmmm:

Onkel Neal

06-15-09 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribesman (Post 1118249)

The only thing confused in this issue is you, that is because really simple things are quite beyond your grasp.

Your post demonstrates that you havn't the faintest idea what you are talking about.

Indeed , there is a thing called a dictionary , it explains what words mean.
Underage is clearly defined
So perhaps you can find a dictionary , then find someone in your house who has a functioning brain and then they can explain to you in really simple words why you are completely clueless.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramike (Post 1118051)

This isn't going anywhere, let's take a break.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Page 6 of 6

« First

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page