The guys, irrespectively to speak about real parameters of the weapon is simply ridiculously. :p LOL

If mr. Gorshkoff the expert in the weapon - let he to us will say about it, we shall make these replacements in a our databases.

But I think that he at first should ask about it at from CIA and KGB. They for certain know it.:D :D :D

That than us is fed with magazines and other " the open sources " are all a deceit.

Will pass 20 years and only then we find out on what the weapon was capable nowadays existing.

Mr. Gorshkoff - I have the documentary amateur film which has been make onboard a boat of a class Oscar (TOMSK Hull) during training - and I see as charge a torpedo USET-80 in the torpedo apparate for a shot, and it does not have any adaptations wire of the control.
This torpedo shot from boat, and crew have forgotten about it - and only waited when she will find the target...

If you in a zoo will see the elephant in a crate, and on the table "MOUSE" for You will be written: what is it do not believe the own eyes?

That You, will believe more - Eyes or Tables???

LW EDIT: Removed Political Content

Please save political discussion for the General Topic forum.

Further posts in this thread regarding politics will be deleted without warning.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Cheers,
David

LW EDIT: Removed Political Content

So anyways, about the mod... did you know the helos are pinging when they are landing on the FFG?

Can you somehow just move the "political" posts? There seems to be substantial interest. I'd like to ask some questions myself, but I'd respect the moderator, the intent of this particular sub-board and the intent of the thread.

Back on topic, citing a source that does not mention a capability is not a disproof of the ability. You might notice that the UGST's wire guidance capability is not mentioned either.:D

Yes, you are extremely sharp, I noticed the same thing. :)

Of course, I failed to remember that Amizaur was quite familiar with the details of that weapon due to a relative of his. In fact, he knows quite intimate things about the USET-80 such as the fact that the weapon has only two discrete speed presets, selectible only by removing a panel from the weapon and reaching into the engine and pulling a lever. Apparently, the process is such a pain, that the weapons are almost never fired in any mode other than their max speed.

I believe if the USET-80 were wireguided, it would have come up long before now. :know:

Cheers,
David

When is everyone going to simply ignore this guy? You know......don't go away mad......just go away. :hmm:

@ Troll: I haven't reported it yet... I'm not backing anyone. That was just a joke to LW, partly at my own expense.

@Capt. Sparrow: will you be stepping away from your pig boat anytime soon? We could use a SW driver on Cinco de Mayo...

@LW: Sorry for the OT message. I'll be good. Or better yet.... you know the detection ranges are too long right? Remember that russian analysis in the pdf? You should learn from it.

There, now it's on-topic!

Do you have anything interesting to announce to us in this thread? Maybe some info or photos about Russian torpedoes? Maybe some unknown proofs of Yeltsin's big achievements in the naval shipbuilding area?

If not, go to wag one's chin somewhere else! :yep:

PS. Could you finally clear this tread by removing or shifting all off-topic posts into General Topics Forum, Lufty?

OK as a mod here I am going to get my big stick out. This thread is about the LWAMI mod so I want to see it stay that way from now on with no name calling or bitching. If you want to have a political discussion do it by PM or in General topics. One of you already has a warning by PM (you know who you are) I don't want to have to hadn out another. I will be watching.