![]() |
Quote:
A thorium reactor is a liquid fuel fission reactor, but it's still experimental |
Or you could use liquid uranium salts (for example), liquid fuel reactors are tricky. The issue with non standard isotope fuels is that you have to manufacture those, hence why regular (unenriched) uranium reactor is about the best thing around.
|
128mm sea level rise north of NYC in 24 months:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-31604953 |
Sea levels have risen 150 meters since last ice age. An estimated 60 meters of ocean waters currently locked up in polar ice caps. And it's not the first time its happened either, so get used to it, if you live long enough to see it. :O:
|
Quote:
http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/12/i...we-talked.html Quote:
And yet despite that, we end up with something like this (Which Dowly first posted) http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta...-Pie-Chart.png This also implies, by your logic. that the vast majority of the scientific community is completely corrupt. If that were true, then where are all the whistle blowers? You know, the young idealist researchers just starting out, who still have ethics and all of that. Surely at least a few would have come out by now with damning evidence of this scientific fraud you claim. Quote:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/causes.html http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/ Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That's just one example of how things could go very badly. Anyhow, the problem always with this discussion, is that it is mostly about dogma, between people that don't even begin to understand the science or the theory. This is why it is nigh impossible to change a person's mind, no matter how much you obliterate the others argument. Good scientists are flexible in their thinking, they are able to realize and accept when their theory is conclusively shown wrong. To date there is absolutely no conclusive evidence disproving the major theories about climate change. None. This doesn't mean that we should stop trying to disprove it mind you (as this is the most important aspect of science). But we better seriously consider that the theories are more or less correct, and what the implications are. |
I still say we're the only thing staving off the next ice age. :)
|
Hey, I'm all for science, let them learn and study and publish their findings people can and will learn from it. But this global warming stuff has in my opinion turned into a fiasco of attention whores, politicized and divisive squabbling over funds, donations, placing blame, headlines, boasting. Its all crap. Unfortunately it appears everyone has their own agenda and it never seems to coincide with making the world a better place. Instead it all comes down to who can make the most money. Like those self-depreciating arse-hats that come along and start preaching the climate change gospel, then proceed to profit off it to the tune of 100 million dollars selling "carbon credits"
It is my humble opinion this warming trend is a natural occuring phenomenon just as the possible result of a clathrate gun going off is. Which by the way was an interesting read. It is also my humble opinion at this point in time neither can be controlled. But who knows science just might find a solution and figure that out. I will not rule out miracles either, I just don't know. Look, the way I see it, we all have death on our list of things to do. Wether it's because we're too stupid to build on high ground, partying on the beach during a hurricane, avalanche, Earth letting go a big fart and we all die smelling it, getting run over by elephants or we are just too damn old and the body gives out on us. We will all at one point in our lives have to face the inevitable. And I'd bet too this is what a lot of this warming trend fiasco and panic stems from. Life IS too short to get wrapped up fretting like many seem to do over our demise. The way I see it what we do between our birth and death is whats important. We should go out live life too its fullest do something you never done before, have fun, achieve. |
Quote:
http://aldeburgh.oneplacestudy.org/w...ac1abca_06.png The town high street in 1953. :03: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...84_634x198.jpg All Saints Church in Dunwich over the course of two centuries. |
I get to see it here in the Chesapeake Bay too. The house pictured below finally fell into the bay just a few years ago. It once was part of a community established in the 1600's on Holland Island, all of which is now underwater. Due to sea level rise and land mass sinking back iinto the bay.
https://res.cloudinary.com/roadtripp...and-550683.jpg |
Quote:
|
Yep, science not only suggests sea level rise but errosion too. There also some suggesting land is still slowly washing back into a crater created by a massive meteor strike near what is now Cape Charles Virginia.
and life goes on. well, atleast untl the Earth farts (clathrate gun) :) |
Quote:
I think the real goal of climate change science should be to find out how to minimise our impact on the planet, whilst also minimising the planets impact on us. :hmmm: |
California's historic drought
Man, it's getting bad out west. Any of you have this impact you?
Quote:
The article includes Texas, but I thought Texas is nearly back to normal levels after the non-stops rains this winter. At least it seems to be on the Gulf Coast...:hmmm: Edit: Hmmm. I guess not Quote:
|
R. O.
|
:sign_yeah:^Thank god! I won't have to mow the lawn much longer! Besides, who really cares about the water( the tribulation):Dhttp://www.how-to-draw-cartoons-onli...-desert-11.gif http://resources0.news.com.au/images...3a93f69707.jpg<the rapture. Water in California is always politics and it's business as usual. revisit Chinatown the movie.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ownposter1.jpg
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.