If 25% of all muslims are western-hating radicals thats about 250+ million people we are talking about. Or slightly less than the entire US population.

If I could chose, I would indeed prefer a Mulsim-free Germany - or rather, a Religion-free - but that is a different topic.

I didn't blame anyone for anything, except criminals committing crimes and my government, or rather Europe, to still open their arms, letting everyone in, even committing censorship.
There needs to be some sort of selection system, I wonder who had the brilliant idea to let all foreign "military aged men" enter Europe, for whatever reason.

A refugee is someone who has to flee his country because he would die there and can't fight back. So bring in the Women and children, take the best possible care of them for the time being - and as soon as this is over, send them HOME, no questions asked.
I don't see why a ~25yo male who complains about bad w-lan connections and "boring food" 3 times a day he neither worked or paid for, has any right to be here, let alone breath oxygen - another topic again.

And sorry, 85% "angels" or not, you can't save them all and while I would love to help those who need and deserve it, I won't accept putting the already fragile Europe at risk because we all must hold hands and talk together with people from an ideological background that preaches to destroy the western world, one way or another.
But yeah, let's not blame the 85% (or 75%!), let us just continue and endure what is going on.

Jesus, some German politicians (local level, not governmental) even said crap like "please don't rape" and how we have to teach them that rape isn't cool here. What!?

NO!

The "radical minority" in Islam was not bred in a culture-free, non-Islamic vacuum. It is the result of cultural contexts which are to be held responsible. Islam IS radical.

Most Germans 80 years ago did not strangle a single Jew with their own hands. Many, probably a majoirty of Germans were not Nazis. Still, many Germans did not wish to have much to do with Jews, and today the vast and very unquestionable majority of Muslims wordwide dispise Jews and do not wish to have anything to do with them and do not want to live housedoor to housedoor with them, we know that from many emprical studies in many different Muslim and Western countries. So, still, Nazism and the terror it brought to the world, is of German origin. And Gemany and Germans have something to do with it. Even if not every German applauded the KZs. Or knew of their existence. The same way Islamic culture and society has to accept repsonsibility that radicalsm is not separated from it, but is bred in the very core and centre of Islam - by Islam itself.

This endlessly repeated discussion of that most Muslims are claimed to be peaceful and not radical, leads nowhere, and just should distract from the barbaric content of Islamic ideology and instead wants to declare it the victim and by that make it unavailable for crital views and criticism - all this ideology is at the very root of the problem. And that ideology all too often is not open to and is no question of interpretation, but indeed is explicitly resistant to being distorted by different ways of interpretation. Thats why Muhammad preached the way he did - to prevent right this. Strength (and his own rule) by totalitarian unity. Tolerance for different opinions and views, mutliculturalism, never was on his agenda. You live dangerous when disagreeing with Muhammad. Back then. And still so today.

I think you hit the nails head, Skybird.
Good example as well, it just makes sense - if one likes it or not.

Should we treat every Muslim as radical then, just in case ? Better be safe then sorry, I think you say in some English speaking countries

Markus

Garbage Holocaust analogy aside - nothing of what you're saying squares against the fact that the overwhelming majority of victims of Islamic terrorism are Muslims themselves.

Which easily gets rid of your overly simplistic "Islam is radical" explanation.

Most Germans survived WWII. A Denazification program was being run nevertheless: it was no genocide.

Stop allowing Muslims to weasel around, victimising themselves, and claim irrespoinsi8bility by telling lies about that what radcils do has nothing to do with Islam. That is like claiming Nazi Germany had nothing to do with German hisotry and German Zeitgeist of that era.

Westerners tend to avoid conflicts and challenges for a whole variety of the queerest and absurd fould excuses. In princple it always is about cowardice. But when you identify evil - you shall not sweet-talk and weasel around it, and make compromises. You confront it and call it by its names. And if it then starts to balk, howl and bite - bite back stronger.

Troubles, troubles, troubles. We must stop always trying to arrange ourselves with them. The problem is an ideology and its content and claim, and this is what we need to understand, fight against, and bring down at least within the realms of our own home countries.

Which is our natural right, btw.

Its absurd to think Skybird is calling for anyone to take up arms. Like anyone else here he's concerned most about those things close to him. He is I think just trying to say "recognize what the culture of islam breeds see it for what it is and look at what it is doing to my country, city, neighborhood, etc. etc.".

I think he hit the nail on the head.

But as always the case, those who are far above the fray or far away from ground zero are usually the ones who cry the loudest for tolerance. This serves only to infuriate the ones having to deal with the consequences of their social engineering experiments.

Someone in German politics really needs to pull their head out of their arse and seriously consider stemming the flow of immigrants. Crime is skyrocketing neighborhoods are changing and those at ground zero are sick and tired of being chastised for being intolerant.

I dont think we would hear a peep out of Skybird if these immigrants assimilated and became productive citizens of Germany. But they're not, they're looking for hand outs and when there are idle hands there are idle minds and then you have serious problems.

UPDATE!

Our glorious Prime Minister will not be giving his house to house asylum seekers.

He says that the location is too public (might that be because he announced his plans on live TV back in September?) and thus the safety of the asylum seekers cannot be guaranteed.

I know, right! Who would've guessed!?


On a lighter note, the company that supplies food to the asylum centers accidentally might have slipped some bacon in their goulash. :88)

Bacon in goulash ??

That is what the company said in the article.

Must be a different recipee than what a traditional goulash here is :hmmm:

No bacon in goulash, that simple.

1.5 kg cheap beef, and as much onions. No paprika vegetable! (only powder, both sweet and hot poweder needed), cayenne pepper, quite a lot of marjoram, solid amount of caraway, 2-4 bay leafs, salt, tomato paste. Pressure cooker, 45 minutes.

I love goulash, and its one of the few dishes I really excel in in preparing it, if I may believe my guests. In long ago times I often got asked for preparing right this, and no other dish.

Bacon. Tzzzz.... Schnapsidee...

Same recipee as we do it.
Only without cayenne pepper, although I myself would ad it.

Maybe they meant bolognese, media isn't good at correctly naming things.

Why is it garbage in your opinion?
No... not at all? It doesn't matter who they target.
They are muslims causing trouble in the name of their religion.
It is a rather simple matter.
If Christians, no matter if Catholics or protestants or whatever, would run around blowing market places up and cutting heads off - in the name of the religion - would you not come to the conclusion that Christianity is radical?
Would you really just say "no, they are no real Christians!" when their holy book literally calls out to do such things?