i never associated left or right... i never said any of that :06:

edit: not sure what you want me to say Tak, i never put any politics into my comment.

i dont agree with the guy.

just saying i have rights... try to dismantle them i will fight to keep it them.

thats all i said

Oh come on already. You've got an off-his-rocker conspiracy theorist screaming for 15 minutes on national television and the most you can say about him is that he is 'passionate'. If he were espousing left-wing views you would have no shortage of vitriol for him. But, he's on the side of firearms, so he gets the kid gloves.

Ok...

I want to eat his babies alive and i wish his wife had breast cancer

does that ummmm.... make you feel any better?

i really dont have much of an opinion about what the guy has to say, he doesnt speak for me... he got on the show and did his own thing. whatever.

we're apparently talking about two different issues and the issue im talking about doesnt involve the guy

I was on TV?! :o

no no its ok calm down

drink your juice, just relax and go play your computer games :woot:

OK.

LMAO :haha:

Great video on why I have no respect for Piers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRJ0ls_W9XM

He openly misinforms to fit his agenda.

But don't forget the follow up to the circus freak show, he said that he is now expecting to be assasinated by the NYPD and the mafia which is run by Bloomberg.

Whatever the cost may be is not a fair opinion it is a rather silly opinion if you look at the costs.
Allowing crazy loons unfettered access to firearms is one of the major costs you are happy to be paying

What do you mean by anti-gun and what do you mean by banning?


Reality check fails on a scale that is equal to Morgan.
And you cite Faux news which is openly misinforming to tell you another network is misinforming?

I mean that I think that guns should be banned outright. But I'm also aware that, while the sensible gun owners will hand over their guns if guns are banned, some would shoot at any and all people who went over to them to confiscate their guns.

Cool, more fallacies. You argued nothing in the video, and attacked me.

Please, tell me how and what in that video was wrong, I'd be more than happy to hear it.

Why?

You are the one presenting fallacies, linking to a media piece doesn't show how bad morgan is it shows how bad the media can be.
Jones did a better job of demolishing Morgans credibility, but that job also includes Murdochs empire on a far greater scale.

Check the statistics and more importantly check their nature in relation to each other.
Even the main source cited on Fox puts a bloody big disclaimer on it.

They cited a British source. Is it accurate or not?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2HQDkC3re

No, make that two.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...orld-list#data

You dismiss Ben Swann and Fox News out of hand, using the usual demeaning joke name, but it would seem he has his facts straight on this.

Incorrect:
http://www.aquaexplorers.com/fossil%...ekin%20(7).jpg:know:

Daily Mail:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::hah a:
hmmmm...2009?
Even better they go back to 1997 as a measure even though that country completely changed their methods in a manner which means Britians figures cannot be compared with Britains figures.

Where is Britain on that table and why is data it from 2005?
Fox claimed 2011 and morgan claimed last year...does that make it irrelevant to the claims?

No I dismiss them after listening to what they are saying.
They are talking crap just like Morgan was talking crap.
Therefore they do not show how morgan was misinforming they are just misinforming.

Despite the obvious problems with different years different methodology and different categorisation which puts them all back to the academic level of back of the envolope calculations there are some glaringly obvious reasons why the misrepresentation is an epic fail.
Two further examples
Yemen:haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha:eve n a person bathed in ignorance should be able to see why you cannot use statistics from that country.
3 Carribean nations? don't they manage to destroy the whole supposed basis of the 2nd amendment?:hmmm:


Seriously Steve, you think would I dismiss Fox out of hand just because it is Murdoch any more than I would dismiss Morgan simply because he is a prat.
Hey I even read your Daily Fail before dismissing it just to double check that it was talking rubbish as usual.

Hey Steve, as a bonus question how does the politicians made up figures from the second article link directly back to Ben Swanns boss?

Yeah, and HITLER! :haha:

Alex Jones, doing more to hurt the pro gun cause than 50 Sandy Hooks.

To be fair, here's some crazy from the anti-gun side

Thanks, that leads to another line of bull Jones trotted out.

Poor old uncle adolf abolished the very tight gun controls that existed during the Weimar republic.
Hitler wasn't someone that took away peoples guns, he took away the governments restrictions on firearms.
Hitler was a gun nut:rotfl2:

Taking guns from the mentally unstable, stopping gun sales that do not do background checks for criminals and issueing licenses that have to be renewed so ongoing things which people agree should curtail your rights to a gun like felony convictions and mental problem can be checked.
Sorry I don't see the equation with the new world order global conspiracy nut who thinks the chinese civil war was won because only one side had guns

Wow I just saw the AJ rant on Peirs Morgan, painful to watch (probably because I can't stand either of them) :D
My opinion, Im in two minds about gun ownership, it has both advantages and disadvantages. But I reckon that in the current climate Americans should probably hang on their guns, since by handing them in now you'd putting complete faith in the frederal goverment, to: a) protect you, b) not screw you over.
I wouldnt bet on either.