![]() |
Over the past days, I repeatedly read about biologists voicing increasing criticism of the NASA study, accusing the authors of methodological flaws, sometimes even dilletantism. The criticsim first came from British, Canadian and German scientists, but then from Russia, other European countries and finally all the world, it seems. It seems the autzhors, and NASA, are under fire.
If I understood it correctly, this Blog entry by micro-biologist Rosie Redfield from the university of British Columbia in Vancouver was the first salvo against the NASA study. http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2010/...ria-nasas.html I'm surprised that it gets relatively little coverage. But maybe I just miss the show. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.