SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Good bye Europe (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=91296)

Sixpack 03-30-06 09:45 AM

Overall a great post, Abraham :up:

Those ME customs dont belong here, unless it's in a restaurant where it's part of the act, and I play along :)

TteFAboB 03-30-06 11:08 AM

I'm with you Abraham.

A Jewish friend of mine blesses pork before chewing it. :D

I have travelled to many regions of Africa, most of which today are in different hands with different borders, I was forbidden to enter Kenya with the lame excuse of being from the PLO, fine, Mr. Kenyan revolutionary, I won't spread my western influence, wisdom and knowledge to your local population and subvert them in the most basic revolutionary way. Really, I won't! That's the whole point!

In my trips to Africa and Indochina I've ALWAYS made an effort to keep a low-profile. I don't like being a tourist, it's not fun, unless you're looking to relax at a resort or enjoy common attractions or sites, but to me it is much more fun to reach out and touch the local population. In most of the globe I've visited I can go easily unnoticed, but on more sinister regions as Soweto, if you go as a tourist (good luck) you'll be looked down by the locals, if not with hate, but if you can bypass the book-cover judgement, then you can discover what Soweto is really like, the people, the land, the culture.

As a tourist, I could run to the airport or an embassy and escape at any time, I could insult and hurt the locals all I wanted and simply run away, I had my home to go back to, my safe heaven, I had no fundamental need to respect the local culture.

But I wouldn't do that if I understand I'm stepping on a land that is not my own, talking with people whom I share no bonds with at all, other than the spiritual one, as we're both Human, in a country which I have nothing to do with, the least I can do is respect the local population, learn and understand the culture and do my best to integrate.

The reward is unmeasurable. The smile on their faces, the long chatting afternoons that went deep into the night, being invited to their homes, to dinner with them, being welcomed into their lives, having the doors and windows wide open, it is a very special feeling to share with a distant "stranger" from a distant land, suddenly, it all seems so much closer, to home, to your inner self. It's a pleasure every person should be allowed to experience once in their life times. I mean, how many people can say they have a North Vietnamese General as a pen-pal?

Now, imagine an immigrant! Shouldn't the demands be even higher? A tourist can behave like me voluntarily, but an immigrant, he needs to make the foreign land his own, he needs to understand the foreign culture to be able to feel part of it, knowing or learning the language should be mandatory.

I believe so, using as an exemple the Japanese immigrants from the past decades. People from a different land, rich with culture and religion, no less than any Muslim, and they managed to immigrate without causing any cultural conflicts, their values matched perfectly with those of their hosts. During WW2 they were locked in concentration camps by many nations, yet, the past is left to the past, because revolving these corpses would bring nothing but problems, it doesn't matter, life goes on, there's a life to live and it's not in the graveyard. I'll end the comparison here, because it would be unfair to go further and remember Japanese immigrants brought with them technology techniques and agricultural know-how as Muslims can't be expected to develop such things under Islam and in the desert, so I won't touch that point.

But speaking of which, the only region I never visited was the Muslim world. Never felt the desire, my first contact with an Egyptian Muslim was at the Seine, he was pissing in the river. Now, that's not the problem, I would piss at the Seine anytime too, everybody should piss at the Seine even. Jokes aside, the only thing actually stopping me from pissing at the Seine is that it was not my home, it was not my river. Now, pissing on the streets is awfull, people must be remembered all the time we ditched the dark ages, we have better sewage than ever and we should confine our corporeal excretions to that system. No blame on the Egyptian, if the French pee in their own streets, how do you expect him to understand his custom is not actually acceptable and the French who do that are actually violating the law? When there's no one to set the example... If you actually forced Muslim immigrants to understand what they're getting themselves into, chances are they'd become better and more French than the traditional Seine-pissing Frenchmen.

The Avon Lady 03-30-06 11:19 AM

Re: Good bye Europe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abraham
@ The Avon Lady:
If somebody greets you in a Western country like Holland by streching out his/her hand and you refuse to take that hand for reasons of modesty, you are making a mistake. Whether it concerns a Muslim man or woman is not the determaning factor for my claim.

I fully agree with you. In fact, I would shake that person's hand if it will avoid embarrassing or insulting him, as that is much much greater prohibition in this case.

My point, however, was that you should not attribute this case to Islam's viewing women as inferior. You have other proofs for that but not here.
Quote:

The mistake is that, while the rule that has been given in your religion, may be very valid within the timeframe and/or within the society in which it is generally accepted, you - as a new immigrant - have moved to a new society, with another culture and you have to think hard whether that is acceptable for you and - if not - how far you will compromise without shutting yourself up in your own subculture.
Even assuming I would not shake someone's hand under the circumstances, it is farfetched to state that such an act alone indicates I am intraverted within my own subculture. That is a totally unproportional description.
Quote:

I know this kind of problems can pop up within Judaïsm as well as in Islam. However, there it is - if I am well informed - not only a matter of modesty but also of cleanness and hygiene. That had its merits, 2.500+ years ago in the desert, but those rules are archaïc an sometimes offensive.
I have never heard this one. Logically, that would mean that same-gender handshakes should be forbidden, too. This is certainly not the case in Judaism. Please enlighten me if you find a source for this explanation in Islam.
Quote:

I once knew a stewardess with KLM who was asked by a fundamental (male) Jewish passenger if she had her period, otherwise he did not want to be served by her.
The gentlemen is either a super holyman or he's cracked out of his wits. This never happens in all of the circles I am involved in, including what you call "fundamental" ones.
Quote:

My reaction: go hich hiking or fly El Al.
On El Al, they'd let him starve. And other strictly Orthodox Jewish passenger's, knowing how out of line this is, would be disgusted and pipe up and tell him so.
Quote:

Nobody ordered you to fly KLM, but if you do, you accept the local norms.
I think I've responded to this point of norms and your case of abnorms.
Quote:

(Although religious Jews sometimes prefer to fly KLM to enjoy non-kosher food, not having ordered a kosher meal beforehand but blaming KLM for a mess up in order to justify themselves with their friends. KLM countered those tactics by keeping scores of extra kosher meals on Tel-Aviv-Amsterdam-New York flights.) :D
An observant Jew who wants to eat non-kosher food is really wasting the opportunity by jumping with excitement over an airline meal. Poor fella!
Quote:

This kind of behaviour, whether based on religion or archaic customs, is often considered very offending if not discriminatory by the autochtones, who are reaching out to help newcomers integrate in our society.
As far as I know, especially the Jews are masters in strechting the interpretation of those rules in such ways that they are not to much hindered in their daily live by these rules themselves, in the proces circumvening their original intention. To give an exemple: observant Jews are not allowed to make fire or light during the Sabbath. When my father was young (in the early thirties of last century) he and his friends went to Jewish families on Friday nights and earned a few dimes by switching on the light in their houses.
In this case, the rules might and might not have been stretched. Furthermore, this ruling is based on other existing rules.
Quote:

Nowadays modern wigs have replaced old time veils
There is a strong opinion whether wigs are permissable or not but either way, it is not a question of stretching rules and laws but rather whether permissable or not.
Quote:

and electronics has come to the help of the observant Jews. Hotels in major Israeli cities have a "Sabbath-elevator" which is set to stop at each floor so you can get in and out without pressing - and lighting - a button (or having to resort to the stairs).
Once again, no stretching of laws here - rather their application.
Quote:

While this may sound funny, opportunistic or even hypocritical to some, observant Jews are fully justified to set their own religious parameters and shouldn't care about world opinion.
However, a problem arises when one decides to settle in a different country and culture and especially when one interacts with the autochtone population. Because not observing the dominant rules of normal behaviour is a statement: I moved to and am now living in your culture, but my own culture forbids me to follow your cultural rules. In other words, my culture is superior and I don't accept your culture as dominant.
Well, Jewish history in Europe speaks for itself. In some places, especially in but not limited to Eastern Europe, strictly Orthodox Jews were often limited to living in Ghettos.

But for the most part, even such Jews were farmers and tradesmen once they were permited to be. And they never worked en-masse on a basis of any religious commandments to overthrow or usurp a government.
Quote:

Well, you really have a problem then, because you are offending another ethnic group or culture. Integrate or move back, too bad.
All this for a handshake. Tsk. Tsk.
Quote:

By the way, the link you gave clearly states the archaïc, sexually induced, male dominant view on the "problem" of normal physical contact between men and women (weird that neither the fundamental Judaïsme nor the Islam takes the possible sexual tangent of physical contact between men and men into account! In those cultures men to men contacts can be quite intense, embracing and often kissing is considered acceptable. This is in my view proof of the male-dominant background of those rules).
Once again, your claim is faulty. We women also greet with hugs and kisses. Furthermore, once upon a time the world wasn't full of homosexuals, as it is today - certainly not the Jewish world. Laws were not enacted when there was no concern for them.
Quote:

Quote:

Every time an Orthodox man or woman distances him or herself from even the most non-erotic forms of physical contact, he or she is reminded that what is forbidden in this instance is promoted elsewhere - i.e., within the exclusive context of marriage.

Every act of distancing is also an act of drawing close to one's spouse.

A ban on touching acknowledges the natural physical attraction between men and women, and serves as a warning.

True, shaking hands is a pretty innocuous form of contact, and for that reason some Orthodox religious authorities permit it in the business context. But the same claim of innocuousness is made for kissing and hugging in many circles. Rather than stepping onto a slippery slope and leaving the matter to subjective determinations about the erotic content of any particular act, many Orthodox Jews choose to simply avoid any physical contact.

A ban on touching acknowledges the natural physical attraction between men and women, and serves as a warning. Those who observe the ban convey the message that "the erotic element is excluded from our relationship." Far from showing a lack of "dignity and respect" for those of the opposite gender, observance of the ban reflects a determination to treat members of the opposite sex with the utmost respect - as everything but objects of sexual desire. Judging from the proliferation of sexual-harassment charges in work settings and elsewhere, many women would prefer precisely such relationships
... but are not asked", I would like to add.
Demanding women not to do certain things and cover themselves up to a certain degree is a typical male-dominant easy way out-rule. The problem clearly lies with men who are obviously susceptable to hit the "slippery slope" of "disrespect" and even possible "sexual harrisment" when seeing an unveiled woman or touching het in "even the most non-erotic form".
Poor Jewish and Muslim men, what should we do about them. I guess those religions should come up with some drastic rules for men to behave, for instance a ban on looking at attractive women. The problem is that unless you resort to Burka's and Niqfa's or whatever garbage bag-style of clothing, women still can be attractive to men, and often want to be so. Sexual attractiveness is created by G-d, God, Allah and any denial of this sexual tension only serves to magnify sexual frustration.
I mean I can honestly say that - ostentably contrary to the men the quote reflected upon - I can shake a man's or a woman's hand with the most non-erotic thoughts...
:D
Yet G-d put limitations on many things. This is a decree to enforce such limitations, plain and simple.

You don't believe in modesty? Fine? But your intollerant view of those that do is just that - intollerant.

JamesT73J 03-30-06 11:34 AM

Does this mean that this guy and some Israelis don't like Europe, or may not visit us?

Sounds like a good deal to me.

TLAM Strike 03-30-06 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TteFAboB
Now, pissing on the streets is awfull...

Tell that to Japanese men. :rotfl:

The Avon Lady 03-30-06 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesT73J
Does this mean that this guy and some Israelis don't like Europe, or may not visit us?

Sounds like a good deal to me.

No problem. You're born there and you'll die there.

Live long and prosper.

Skybird 03-30-06 12:12 PM

Nice post, Abraham.

Kapitan 03-30-06 12:39 PM

Just off here a bit.


I for one will be glad if the European union broke up, not only does it make less money than seperate countrys but also such stupid rules and laws that have to be impliments by all countrys, and most are contradictory.

I hate the E.U ive never supported it, i will never support it, the sooner it goes the better.

STEED 03-30-06 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kapitain
I hate the E.U ive never supported it, i will never support it, the sooner it goes the better.

That makes two of us.
:up: :yep: :up: :yep: :up: :yep: :up: :yep: :up: :yep:

Kapitan 03-30-06 03:29 PM

A sobering though steed for you.

We might have to one day pay Euro tax :o

JamesT73J 03-30-06 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesT73J
Does this mean that this guy and some Israelis don't like Europe, or may not visit us?

Sounds like a good deal to me.

No problem. You're born there and you'll die there.

Live long and prosper.

You know, call me a cynic, but I wouldn't consider a site titled 'jihadwatch' to be the definitive, objective authority on the state of Muslim communities in Europe, anymore than I consider the suggestion that we're going to hell in a camelhair-weave handbasket as anything more than hysterical rhetoric by rather dull people with nothing better to do.

The Avon Lady 03-31-06 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesT73J
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesT73J
Does this mean that this guy and some Israelis don't like Europe, or may not visit us?

Sounds like a good deal to me.

No problem. You're born there and you'll die there.

Live long and prosper.

You know, call me a cynic, but I wouldn't consider a site titled 'jihadwatch' to be the definitive, objective authority on the state of Muslim communities in Europe, anymore than I consider the suggestion that we're going to hell in a camelhair-weave handbasket as anything more than hysterical rhetoric by rather dull people with nothing better to do.

As I like to say:

Good luck Europe!

You're not a cynic. :nope: You're an ostrich. :yep:

I don't care if you want to close your eyes to the editorial and commentary content on JW's site but for heaven's sakes read the news items they link to, usually from established and accredited news agencies, with all of their faults.

If you've got something to refute against them, go ahead and spill it out.

I have a better idea. Study Islam. Read the Quran, Sunnas and Hadiths. Ignore me. Ignore JW. Ignore Skybird and other posters here. But do yourself a favor and get wise. Here's your starting point:

USC MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts. This site at the University of Southern California is sponsored by the Muslim Students Association in the US.

You have no more excuses. What you don't know will hurt you.

Skybird 03-31-06 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady
I have a better idea. Study Islam. Read the Quran, Sunnas and Hadiths. Ignore me. Ignore JW. Ignore Skybird and other posters here. But do yourself a favor and get wise.

I agree with AL here, James. what AL or me is saying is not that important. Form your own opinion, don't just copy the opinion of others. That also means: do not simply copy opinions of mainstream medias which are far from being unbiased in this question but mimic a sociological motivation to make a stand "pro" Islam. Don't pick for small pieces of info about Quran or Hadith or whatever, that are ripped out of context, but do a substantial study of it. There also is a lot of academical analysis on Islam, which maybe is even more needed for a beginning, since the material is so diverse and self-contradictory. I was confused and was led to false conclusions in the bginning, 13, 15 years ago, I admit. Those academical works that are able to proove their conclusions by refering to evidence and historical facts you can re-check yourself are the ones you can trust, to some degree.

Do you think I travelled and worked in the Middle East that much because I am fascinated by the Orient? Far from that! I hate the area, really. But since I first learned about Islam, I felt threatened by it, almost by instinct, so I sat down and learned about it, and then wanted to see for myself, at location. Later it was also a lot of money involved, admitted, but that is something different. First, it seemed that my initial sentiments were not justified and that it all is better than what I feared. But later, now, that I have more distance to all that diverse input, and do not concentrate anymore on the actual single experience and prioritize it no more over the background of information already accumulated, but see it all in one big context, I had to massively correct my first (before travelling) and my second (during travelling, and some years after) conclusions. My motivation to find out about Islam simply is no fascination for the Orient, but an attitude like "know your enemy". As I see it you probably do not know enough about it to form an opinion on whether you would want to see it as friendly or hostile to your society. So indeed, AL is right, do yourself a favour: start to learn, and trust nobody. you will not hear much positive about Islam from me, that is true. but keep in mind: you also will not hear much negative about Islam from Muslims and their representatives. Islam is extremely weak in terms of critical self-evaluation and self-honesty.

It was a stoney road for me to come to my final complete rejection of Islam. I had been positive baout it, I had been neutral about, I have been (and still are) negative aboput it. Do you think you can come to a comparable substantial evaluation with lesser effort?

I makde some assumptions about how much you have studied Islam. If these are incorrect, please tell me and accept my apology then.

STEED 03-31-06 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kapitain
A sobering though steed for you.

We might have to one day pay Euro tax :o

There's more to it than meets the eye :shifty: check your PM box :yep:

Kapitan 03-31-06 09:41 AM

red and understood finding now.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.