If all do it we have to be better, or worse. Depends on p.o.v.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/06/w...-pen.html?_r=0

"One document had last been modified by a Russian user named Roshka Georgiy Petrovich. Mr. Petrovich, 32, an employee of the Moscow-based Eureka CJSC, a Russian technology company, did not immediately return emails requesting comment. Eureka CJSC’s clients include several Russian government agencies."

Of course this has nothing to do with the government, or Putin :03:
But they have really embraced the idea of capitalism, if the russian government orders civilian companies to act in their favour, for money.

But the US "alt-right" also did it:
“They tried to bombard French Twitter with memes favorable to Le Pen,” said Padraic Ryan, a project coordinator at Storyful, an online marketing company that tracks social media activity around news events. “The campaigns are showing an increasing level of sophistication and coordination.”

So i guess future elections of democratic countries depend on whether Russia or the USA hack the elections better? :hmmm:

As our IT specialists joke, atleast they didn't imput Putin into that provocation.

Been thinking for a while

I can't of course say what Russia have done or not regarding the American election.

There is though a question I need an answer to.

Did Russia something to all the American voters who was tired of the Dem and Obama and their politics ?

Markus

The only flaw in the last sentence is the fact the DEM candidate actually defeated the GOP candidate in the popular vote, which is, by virtue of the vote being a direct measure, the will of the voters, without any 'handicapping' by other processes. The popular vote would suggest voters of parties other than the GOP and Independents, by a definitive majority, chose anything other than the GOP and their candidate. This is bolstered by the fact the GOP candidate not only could not win a majority, he could not even win a plurality; that is a fact, not an opinion...




<O>