![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't consider either of them major. Unless there is something recent of which I am unaware. I'll have another look. |
No doubt, but I'd think there would be an obvious connection or motive behind these potential attacks. Everything reported about the terror plot I've read or watched seems kind of vague.
But 7 mint condition Topps baseball cards might add up to a dollar on a good day. So no great loss if I'm wrong :D |
[QUOTE=TLAM Strike;1765945]Ike's plan was to run a shadow CIA army to fight the Soviets and any leftest leaning leaders (democratically elected or not), rather than fund a large military to actually defend against the Soviets/Chinese. When Ike was faced with an actually military crisis in the Taiwan straits he basicly stated that nuclear weapons were to be used like any other shell or bomb. He then had to backpedal. Ike helped place the US Military in a position where nuclear weapons were the first resort against an enemy without them.
[QUOTE] Alot of great points, in your post but I isolated this particular passage. Not trying to diminish or invalidate your other facts and counterpoints just want to discuss this particular one. First this: http://hnn.us/articles/9245.html After we saw how fast the nuclear bomb stopped a fanatical, die to the last man warrior (bushido) culture. It was the best new thing since TVs and Studebakers. The link above relates to Korea (only a few short years after WW2), and at the time we (USA) had such an overwhelming advantage over the world, Ike saw the dangers. Our nuclear culture predates Ike and goes back to Truman. We see it today, admit it...10 year wars with no enemy? I won't call him a saint, I won't call him Lincoln and Kennedy cloned together, no I won't. But he had foresight. Which was most likely why he was an excellent supreme commander. |
An addendum to my last post:
Lets not forget Ike leaving the Hungarians high and dry against the Soviets while at the same time not supporting the UK, France and Israel in reopening one of the most vital waterways in the world. Instead he made it US policy to back Arab dictatorships in the region to counter Soviet aggression instead of backing Western intervention in the region to maintain the status quo. Instead of helping to kick Nasser out of Egypt when he violated an international treaty he left a guy in power who would help bring the entire Arab world down on Israel. |
Quote:
Maybe if the CIA was doing things like finding out how many bombers and rockets the Soviets had instead of staging coups we might have realized just how big of an arsenal we really would have needed to deter the Soviets. |
:timeout:
Quote:
And we thought the arms race was bad before.:haha: |
Let us for a moment, play with the scene, that it's true. The iranian government wanted to kill the Saudia-Arabian embassie to US.
1. Is it enough to send the american into an another war? 2. Will USA start a war, if the saudies ask you to do so, under those circumstances? I say NEY! Expel the iranian ambassador to US and freeze the diplomatical relation would be enough. There government in US, know this, so be aware, there's more to come My danish and swedish friends do believe this is true. They say that it's muslim behavior and there's no needs for further proof. Markus |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Markus |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.