The only reason I brought up that article was to counter yubba's rambling about gays shouldn't be allowed to marry because he thinks it would cost the country money to allow that. You act as if refuting that article is the be all and end all of the marriage equality argument. It's not. I don't buy it, but even if allowing everyone to marry costs money, it's still the right thing to do. There is no price on civil rights.

Nope. That's something you have projected on me which you seem to do fairly often. Personally unless it costs me money I don't really care but if you're going to resort to making fallacies to support your argument on a public forum then expect someone to call you on it.