SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Way to go republicans, way to go. (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=177605)

Jimbuna 12-01-10 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 1545099)
Now that would be a candidate for a quote of the year if you weren't on the committee.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 1545101)
Yes, it is quite taxing....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 1545102)
Oh, it's a punny, punny world. :D

You are both bastids...arguably :DL

Sailor Steve 12-01-10 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 1545085)
...give me Bill Clinton anytime, first balanced budget with surplus.

But he and his congress only achieved that by raising taxes. As I said at the time, if you truly believe they accomplished a good thing then you should root for congress to tax all of us 100%, and give us back what they think we deserve.

Sailor Steve 12-01-10 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1545094)
You know something....your tax system is arguably as arguable as ours in the UK :doh:

I would argue that you are wrong. Our taxes cause no arguments, just vitriol.

Or is that what you were arguing for?

gimpy117 12-01-10 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 1545005)
Ok, let's argue a different standpoint. Were is the evidence that it does not stimulate growth?

the fact that wages of the upper 1% have increased greatly since the 80'S but the middle class have not seen much growth at all


Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1545124)
But he and his congress only achieved that by raising taxes. As I said at the time, if you truly believe they accomplished a good thing then you should root for congress to tax all of us 100%, and give us back what they think we deserve.

Also, too me it seems a little bit backwards to be complaining because the government had to raise taxes too keep it's budget balanced. I mean haven forbid we don't go into debt

Jimbuna 12-01-10 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 1545125)
I would argue that you are wrong. Our taxes cause no arguments, just vitriol.

Or is that what you were arguing for?

Something like that :DL

Growler 12-01-10 11:22 PM

I got an idea:

Let's just pay Congress what we think they're worth.

razark 12-01-10 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Growler (Post 1545284)
I got an idea:

Let's just pay Congress what we think they're worth.

Wouldn't that be called "tax evasion"?

Growler 12-01-10 11:47 PM

Heh.

"A second flood, a simple famine, plagues of locusts everywhere, or a cataclysmic earthquake, I'd accept with some despair. But no, You sent us Congress! Good God, Sir, was that fair?"

August 12-02-10 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 1545085)
Overall, I'm a moderate republican, but Bush lost me. Looking back give me Bill Clinton anytime, first balanced budget with surplus.

Thanks to a Republican dominated Congress. The president does not set the budget balanced or not. That is the purview of the Congress.

Quote:

Tax cuts for the rich was a budget disaster, the rich got even richer and the deficit exploded under Bush . We had a great economy for a few years, but it was standing on toothpicks. Bush was the biggest spender in history as far as waste. Obama, big spender, but even though the GOP cried all non biased groups say if we didn't bail out banks the entire economy would've failed leading to disaster. The problem is not so much the bail out, but still no real regulation to make them pay it all back with interest as wall street makes some of the largest profit gains in history.
Again it's the Congress who appropriates the money, not the President. Big spender Obama doesn't spend dime one unless the US Congress gives it to him to spend.

SteamWake 12-02-10 08:41 AM

Here is a crazy idea...Instead of rasing taxes (which is basically what eliminating the tax cuts is) lets address spending??

Blood_splat 12-02-10 08:56 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcL6Xc_eMM

mookiemookie 12-02-10 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteamWake (Post 1545453)
Here is a crazy idea...Instead of rasing taxes (which is basically what eliminating the tax cuts is) lets address spending??

Because a combination of both is needed to address the deficit.

SteamWake 12-02-10 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mookiemookie (Post 1545462)
Because a combination of both is needed to address the deficit.

Strange I dont remember much discussion on the spending aspect.

All I hear is "You republicans" and "You democrats" and "we need more income".

GoldenRivet 12-02-10 10:56 AM

And if you read enough articles on this subject

this all started when house republicans sent a letter to Harry Reid stating that they would not work with him on bills until Tax Cuts were extended to ALL Americans... not just those "filthy good for nothing billionaires".

Seek and ye shall find.

Takeda Shingen 12-02-10 11:13 AM

Why is the Right so upset? In a few weeks, Tears of Joy Boehner and his crew will take over the house and achieve parity in the Senate. By this time next year Healthcare Reform will be gone, the tax code will be perfect, the economic crisis will be a thing of the past, the poor will be ejected to Mexico, Afghanistan will be a US territory, the border will be perfectly secured and every airport in the nation will be named after Ronald Reagan. Utopia.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.