SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   SH4 Mods Workshop (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=219)
-   -   [WIP] Playable South Dakota & Montana (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=168232)

Soviet Creeper 08-12-11 10:19 AM

Its amazing how stealthy the montana seems to be in one of those storms that dont allow you to see anything. I snuck up on a task force and sunk all of the ships without really being "found" :P

Karle94 08-12-11 10:32 AM

I would reccomend that you use my new Montana. I made a new 3D model and overall improved the ship.

Marka Ragnos 08-12-11 11:20 AM

I have used the new model and found a few bugs which are not on the first version.

The bridge is somewhere inside the ship and front cannons are too close to each other.

Also i have changed some values and that would mean i have to start all over again :p

Still you provide great mods karle and i hope you continue.
I hope one day i get the change to play with the iowa refit the one with the helicoper deck.

Karle94 08-12-11 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marka Ragnos (Post 1726633)
I have used the new model and found a few bugs which are not on the first version.

The bridge is somewhere inside the ship and front cannons are too close to each other.

Also i have changed some values and that would mean i have to start all over again :p

Still you provide great mods karle and i hope you continue.
I hope one day i get the change to play with the iowa refit the one with the helicoper deck.

The new 3D model is in version 1.2 and it doesn`t look like the model you have in the pictures.

The bridge thingy must have been something I missed.

Iowa 1980`s refit will be included in my Cold War-Modern Warfare mod.

Marka Ragnos 08-12-11 12:16 PM

I decided to take a second look at the new model and the crew compartments is in fact alot better.

Time to use the new model :p

Marka Ragnos 08-12-11 12:41 PM

Hi Karle started playing around with the 1.2 version and i have changed a few minor settings.

I first lowered the ship (gc_height is now set at 2)
I also increased the drag so the ship is not moving around so much it should be heavy (up/down drag set to 1,0)

There is one thing that puzzles me the aft cannon is not centered like the others. Any idea which file needs to be edited?

http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/...Hunter/aft.jpg

Karle94 08-12-11 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marka Ragnos (Post 1726690)
Hi Karle started playing around with the 1.2 version and i have changed a few minor settings.

I first lowered the ship (gc_height is now set at 2)
I also increased the drag so the ship is not moving around so much it should be heavy (up/down drag set to 1,0)

There is one thing that puzzles me the aft cannon is not centered like the others. Any idea which file needs to be edited?

http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/...Hunter/aft.jpg

USA_Montana.sim. Open the last obj_turret, open the traverse node and edit min and max traverse. It didn`t work beacuse I didn`t know, and still don`t know witch number to put in those two sections.

Marka Ragnos 08-12-11 01:12 PM

thanks Karle i fixed it

I changed the 150 value to 360 and now it's correct

Karle94 08-12-11 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marka Ragnos (Post 1726699)
thanks Karle i fixed it

I changed the 150 value to 360 and now it's correct

Nw the turret will fire at any ships within 360 degrees, meaning the aftermost turret shoot through the ship.

JapLance 08-12-11 03:14 PM

You could copy the values from number 3 turret, but min=50 max=310 I think should be OK. They're degrees.

Karle94 08-12-11 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JapLance (Post 1726784)
You could copy the values from number 3 turret, but min=50 max=310 I think should be OK. They're degrees.

Thanks. It`s impossible tp find the turret you want among all those guns. I really need those numbers. I will apply them to the Montana and Vanguard.

Karle94 10-03-11 10:30 AM

I`ve been working on a 1.3 version of the SoDak. Did some minor 3D adjustments and added an extra dusin AA guns. I tested her in the Battle
of Midway. Here`s some pics:

I took some damage. It ain`t no big thing.
http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...1-43-25-08.jpg

But then, it grew. Still ain`t no big thing, right? Wrong!
http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...5-19-40-24.jpg

She looks fine on the inside doesn`t she?

Look on the outside!
http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...5-20-54-84.jpg
The most creepiest thing I`ve ever seen.

http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...5-02-35-11.jpg

http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...4-52-15-42.jpg

http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...4-51-13-25.jpg

http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...2-00-27-17.jpg

http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/y...2-00-16-63.jpg

Guess now is a perfect time to say: "Boy, what I wouldn`t would give to sail on the Montana!"

comotoasty 10-03-11 11:44 AM

Karle, you should be court martialed for allowing the USS Alabama to be damaged to such an extent.

As usual, great work!!:rock:

Karle94 10-03-11 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comotoasty (Post 1760068)
Karle, you should be court martialed for allowing the USS Alabama to be damaged to such an extent.

As usual, great work!!:rock:

Guilty as charged. how can they court martial me if I`m dead? One battleship for three battleships, three carriers, five dstroyers. I`d say that`s a good ratio, it could even clear my name.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.