Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDef
(Post 2460992)
Related but not the same, A national ID requirement is different than just a voter id requirement. As far as I'm aware there are no laws requiring a citizen to carry ID papers. The voter ID laws are more akin to a drivers license (you don't need one unless you are operating a motor vehicle). So you won't need to show ID except at the polls to show you are in fact eligible to vote.
|
The point I was trying to make was the opposition to voter IDs is not just only from one political viewpoint or another. When the issue was being thrashed out on those radio talk shows way back then, the voter ID was seen by some on the Far-Right as a sort of "gateway" to the establishment of a universal, national ID system and, to then, that was anathema. I, myself, have no problem with reasonably enacted voter ID laws...
This little gem popped up yesterday; it seems it isn't just those evil illegals who are filling out the ranks of dubious voters:
Tiffany Trump, Steve Bannon, Steven Mnuchin Registered to Vote in Multiple States
http://www.usnews.com/news/national-...ultiple-states
This story points out that it is not illegal to be registered in multiple states, but voting in more than one state in the same election is illegal. There are, in all the argumenst about possible extensive voter fraud in the last Presidential election, a few salient points:
- virtually all of the stats and cites on both sides of the argument deal with
past elections and not the current one in question
- using past as present is akin to using the season before last season's stats to prove why your team should have won the championship; it's not what was done in the season before last season that is important, it is what was done in the most current season
- what is important is not the raw number of dead, or no longer residents, or any other aberrations found on the voting rolls, it is the actual number of those aberrations that resulted in the casting of an actual vote; you could have a million dead people on a state voter roll, but, unless an actual vote is cast in one of those names, there is no voter fraud
- voter fraud only exists if an actual illegal vote is cast and, as of now there is no way of knowing the actual extent of the problem without an actual, independent, investigation, so let's have one; I somehow think neither side is going to be fully pleased with the results
Is there voter fraud? Of course there is voter fraud, just like there is jaywalking or cheating on taxes! The real issue is not question of the existence of voter fraud, it is how much and how can it be mitigated, since I don't think it will ever be fully eradicated. If you really wanted to sway an election, the best, cheapest, and easiest way is tinkering with the votes
after they are cast, not before. If you have control over the count, it really doesn't matter how many illegal votes are cast...
<O>