![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also, read my conclusion at the end of my second document. http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...&postcount=641 |
Quote:
I know one thing, F.'s fantasies are entertaining. I'd love to hear your point of view about, for example, Treblinka, but I guess that would fall under "discussing the holocaust", and in your case, denying it, which is unfortunately a red flag even on Subsim. |
Quote:
Oh, I guess you never wondered about your own political system ... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We could for example make a comparison on how black people was treated in USA and in Germany ... From the Official German Book published after the Olympic games (1936) : http://nsm08.casimages.com/img/2016/...9013925317.jpg http://nsm08.casimages.com/img/2016/...9013925318.png Germans were really some horrible hateful racists ! ... |
Quote:
|
Duplicate
|
Quote:
|
Careful what you say to trap yourself there Fahrendude.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Find some proof that Hitler tolerated all ethncities, and you might make a point. |
Near the beginning of all this, you said:
Quote:
If England and France had not declared war, do you really think Hitler would have set Poland free? Things he himself said indicate the opposite. They've been quoted, and you dismissed them. I also notice you tend to not answer others except to criticize their sources. I pointed out that the Mussolini peace plan was presented after Germany invaded Poland. This makes the claim that Britain and France ignored the offer to be dishonest at best. They had a treaty with Poland, and they honored it. Invading another country and then offering peace is backwards. All your sources try to hide the bottom line I pointed out long ago. Nobody twisted Hitler's arm and forced him to invade Poland. Documented talks between him and his generals has shown that the invasion was planned weeks before the actual event. It's probable that he expected no resistance from the Allies, just as he got none when he forced Czechoslovakia into submission. Trying to make it look like the other side's fault is diverting attention from the truth. Hitler invaded Poland. That's the long and the short of it. |
For what it's worth, if he wants to present evidence or unpublished material, why not, go on. Why a time limit? Translating those texts sure takes time. And, does anyone have to be afraid of its contents?
The documents are interesting enough, however all boils down to when those "offers of peace" from Italy or whoever came, and it was pretty useless to propose that after there were troops already in Poland. And, like the reeducation, you also should not believe all what Hitler said, to make the german people believe in his righteousness to attack Poland, errm defend Germany i meant :03: "Seit 5:45 wird jetzt zurueck [sic!] geschossen" Hitler wanted to go for Russia right from the beginning, and just because of that he wanted no peace with Russia. Unless Stalin would have given him some big chunks of land voluntarily, which i somehow .. doubt. A peacefully united Europe? I assume Hitler did not really want to go to war in the west, but he had strategically only one chance to prevent a two-front war like in WW1, after England declaring war. And there were of course already plans for that, just in case. Like the US having plans for Canada, as we now know. So it may have been England that made it a worldwide war, out of a locally restricted one like Hitler had tried, alright. But assuming Hitler wanted peace with Russia, Poland or the jews is "a bit" ridiculous though. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.