Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
(Post 2314322)
yesterday I saw an American person on Danish news saying that they preferred that he got life instead of death penalty.
Life-then we will not hear about him anymore. He will be locked away, the press will write about it for some days and then he is forgotten.
Death penalty-every time he..(forgot the word) we will hear or read his name.
When I heard and read(subtitle) I thought.
I have never been thinking like that.
Markus
|
That's what I reckoned earlier in the thread. The whole process prior to execution is going to take years probably, and cost a fair amount of money in legal procedings. It will continue to generate headlines whenever an important landmark is reached, and his reactions will be broadcast to the world. By the time he actually gets to the injection room he'll be lauded as a martyr for his cause by the likes of Daesh and Al'Qaeda, and perhaps encourage more people to do their 'religious duty', because what they won't show is him twitching and spasming as the injection takes hold, nor him urinating himself or crying and begging before hand. It will just be reported that he was executed via lethal injection and that will be that. To be honest, even if half of the aforementioned stuff was broadcasted, it would be just denounced as the work of the 'Great Satan' and that he would be better off 'in the arms of Allah', etc.
There's a French word, Oubliette, it's used to describe a particular form of captivity in medieval times. That's the sort of treatment he should have received, in my opinion, bolted away in one of those Supermax prisons and the media discouraged from mentioning his name ever again.
|