![]() |
I'm divided in this issue.
I really want to help those whose fleeing from wars and persecution On the other hand I'm sort of very angry when I see: Refugees makes a scene, because they are given food by Red Cross and they are offend by this "red cross" When our own homeless or the weak can't get somewhere to live-due to laws, which say refugees comes first. Making a scene in countries like Denmark, when they get a simple apartment and simple food-Made for them(halal) I myself are supporting help in their nearby area. Markus |
Quote:
Shouldn't they be worried about isis playing the game to get into other countries and then causing trouble? |
Quote:
|
Meanwhile - Russian Government offers a free acre of land to any citizen... in the Far East.
|
Quote:
<O> |
Quote:
Give me a 10x10km forest and I'm moving there tomorrow. |
Well our hunting launge is 400k acres I think.
The new law is there b/c there is a lot of usable surplus land around various parts of Russia. |
Quote:
I can see I made some misspelling. I'm not angry at every refugees only at those who cause problems. You're 150 % right most of them, don't know how many percentage, are just happy to enter a country were he and his family can live in peace and comfort Markus |
Quote:
Problem is that 0,1% of troublemakers will get the media up and the 50% of morons are going to pick it up like it's the divine truth. Media today is more dangerous than the autocrats of Europe past :nope: |
Quote:
|
Btw, how much land does a person need to sustain himself through farming?
|
Quote:
NO!! I get furious at our politicians. Markus |
I think that goverment stance on distributing resources (such as social housing) to refugees should prioritise citizens over refugees.
|
Quote:
True some made the attempt again. But most stayed put because they couldnt afford it. We cannot take in everyone without some regulation. |
There is also (sometimes) the problem of internal migration. In Russia it is people from poor Caucasus going north (in to Moscow). This is the issue (I think, I could be wrong) that is new to the core EU members, as previously they were not open to such things (Germans were one of the first countries to experience this with the fall of the Wall, but then eastern Germans were not as different to their western kind as immigrants from Balkan Muslim areas would be).
|
Quote:
|
Quite a change from 1979. The US, which had a military presence in Vietnam for decades and also bombed Cambodia and Laos, eventually took in over 1 million Indochinese "boat people" from 1979-97, while another combatant, Australia, took 185,000 and the former colonial master, France, over 100,000. Each seemed to implicitly accept either some responsibility for the postwar mess, or a a desire to help people escape some of the punitive policies of the Hanoi government.
Today, not so much. :-? |
Immigrants even refugees cannot be allowed to just wander in unregulated. Every country must have control of its borders. If you think repatriation is a bad thing go ahead open the flood gates and let everyone in and see what happens. Things will soon spin out of control and chaos would ensue.
|
Quote:
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.